Embed Notice

@jeffcliff @sun
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2405495

Let's take a look at this very early research.

Well, as I see it these methods are very flawed.

Allow me to explain my concerns.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12250-020-00230-5

The measurement of 7.33 log10 TCID50/ml is incredibly odd, it's basically at the limits of detection, I have no idea why they'd use the log10 range unless it was to skew results.

It's clear that they isolated the virus from the samples before the mice experiment.

Also, it proves intentional spread.