Untitled attachment

Notices where this attachment appears

1. Embed this notice
   fluffy@baraag.net's status on Monday, 27-May-2024 03:49:27 JST fluffy

   in reply to

   @jeffcliff @sun
   https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2405495

   Let's take a look at this very early research.

   Well, as I see it these methods are very flawed.

   Allow me to explain my concerns.

   https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12250-020-00230-5

   The measurement of 7.33 log10 TCID50/ml is incredibly odd, it's basically at the limits of detection, I have no idea why they'd use the log10 range unless it was to skew results.

   It's clear that they isolated the virus from the samples before the mice experiment.

   Also, it proves intentional spread.