Embed Notice
HTML Code
Corresponding Notice
- Embed this notice@Crux_Invictus @ArdainianRight @hachi @djsumdog @meowski @BowsacNoodle @SuperLutheran @mrsaturday
I don't care about the Nicene creed, a third century creed doesn't define a first century movement with second century Gnostic leaders.
There is a "god of this world", and I'm considering whether Yahweh was originally meant to be omniscient, because Moses' intercession makes no sense otherwise.
Free will does not separate God from his role in creating man and permitting him to sin, and forming billions to sin continually. Paul does not get to absolve God and neither do you. That is, if you want God to be omniscient. I've no problem with finite gods or a God that is not all-loving, but an omnibenevolent and omnipotent God creates obvious problems.
Leviticus 20:10 And the man that committeth adultery with [another] man's wife, [even he] that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.
How hard is "shall surely be put to death" to understand? The reason the Jews reject Christian interpretations is because they are wrong. Take Deuteronomy 24:1-4 for instance. That's not "Moses suffered it to be so" that's God setting up laws for divorce.
>The fruit of Mormonism is death because it rejects Christ.
Circular reasoning