Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://nicecrew.digital/objects/e36e8b35-925e-4afe-9f1e-04a622d6ac11">WilhelmIII (wilhelmiii@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 03-May-2024 05:07:51 JST</a><a href="https://nicecrew.digital/users/WilhelmIII" title="wilhelmiii@nicecrew.digital"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/245629-48-20240228002047.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="WilhelmIII" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">WilhelmIII</a><div><a href="https://poa.st/objects/abe65847-b7ae-4d47-82c3-30f301da0ab5" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/5283" title="freeintx@poa.st">FreeinTX</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/79023" title="kennywhitepowers@nicecrew.digital">KennyWhitePowers :White_powers:</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/87561" title="feralphilosophernc@nicecrew.digital">Your Loud, Obnoxious Skunkle Jesse</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/101434" title="lovelymiss@nicecrew.digital">lovelymiss</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/145012" title="rose@nicecrew.digital">Rose</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/172965" title="dictatordave@poa.st">dictatordave</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/204787" title="spingebill@poa.st">Spingebill</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/247231" title="uncl3@poa.st">UnCL3</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/247992" title="jb@nicecrew.digital">jb</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/248246" title="escoffier@poa.st">Escoffier Gab refugee</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/249202" title="battledwarfgimli@nicecrew.digital">BattleDwarfGimli</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/252178" title="bobbala@nicecrew.digital">Bob</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/256259" title="liquid_boss@poa.st">Liquid_Boss</a></li></ul></div></section><article>&gt; Article 3 section 1 gives the SCOTUS the judicial authority to be the final say in all matters of legal interpretation and constitutional compliance challenges. <br><br>No it doesn't.<br><br>You're quoting from Marbury v. Madison, where the Supremes just gave themselves that power.</article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3030132#notice-6013053">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-05-03T05:07:51+09:00" title="Friday, 03-May-2024 05:07:51 JST">about 7 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://nicecrew.digital/objects/e36e8b35-925e-4afe-9f1e-04a622d6ac11" rel="external" title="Sent from nicecrew.digital via ActivityPub">nicecrew.digital</a></span></span><a href="https://nicecrew.digital/objects/e36e8b35-925e-4afe-9f1e-04a622d6ac11">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
WilhelmIII (wilhelmiii@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 03-May-2024 05:07:51 JSTWilhelmIII
in reply to
> Article 3 section 1 gives the SCOTUS the judicial authority to be the final say in all matters of legal interpretation and constitutional compliance challenges.

No it doesn't.

You're quoting from Marbury v. Madison, where the Supremes just gave themselves that power.
In conversationabout 7 months ago from nicecrew.digitalpermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice