I have complicated feelings that are not entirely dissimilar to Popehat’s thread here, but are…well…more complicated.
1/ https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:s6j27rxb3ic2rxw73ixgqv2p/post/3lyiwvin3g22n
I have complicated feelings that are not entirely dissimilar to Popehat’s thread here, but are…well…more complicated.
1/ https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:s6j27rxb3ic2rxw73ixgqv2p/post/3lyiwvin3g22n
Charlie Kirk is/was a vile person whose presence in this world made it worse. A world without him is a better world. If he dies, just as with, say, Osama Bin Laden, my feeling will be “good riddance.” I’d celebrate his death, but…not so much his assassination.
2/
@inthehands Assassin? Murder? But I thought Kirk was just “struck by a bullet”
Or do we only phrase it that way when it’s a brown person?
The assassination of a vile person indicates a failure of all the more just, more humane sorts of systems that should have stopped such a person from ever being in a position of power in the first place. Popehat compares celebrating political violence to celebrating war, and I think he has a point: both war and political violence are an indication of failure.
3/
@inthehands I think this is also a very good point: https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:jtadzjgpup2tforvzliq74tp/post/3lyiz5vf4wk2r
The first tragedy here is that we’ve all even heard of Charlie Kirk in the first place.
That dude should have spent his long useless life holed up in his basement ostracized by his neighbors, shunned, shamed, legally constrained, and anonymous to almost everyone.
4/
@fabriek Oh, yes, that is clearly so.
@inthehands Ah, sorry
The pearl-clutching centrist crowd likes to imagine that shaming and shunning are the slippery slope that leads to political violence.
They have it backwards.
Shaming and shunning are the •alternative• to political violence. So is meaningful democracy. So is a judiciary that applies the law, however flawed, with actual judgement and justice.
5/
@cmdrmoto
Was a brown person involved here? I have not heard anything about the shooter yet.
@inthehands The war analogy is really good, in that you don't celebrate the war, but you do celebrate winning battles, even though you'd rather not have to be.
@inthehands Oh, not in this case, no brown people involved AFAIK.
Recently reading about wholesale slaughter in other parts of the world, and the phrasing is decidedly different between [CEOs / Charlie Kirk] vs [family in automobile]
@jstatepost “Critical condition” was the last update I heard.
@inthehands
Shit, Paul, you're saying he's still alive?
@lina
@dalias @inthehands
Yeah, I don't think you need to mourn the death of someone who wants you dead and makes their living taking society-scale actions to enable others to do so.
yeah, that's how i see it. also, i think it's possible to celebrate his death while still generally condemning gun violence and systems that enable and perpetuate political violence.
@jonny @lina @dalias
Definitely not arguing that anyone should mourn his death.
When social opprobrium fails to stuff a turd like Charlie Kirk into some powerless far corner of society where he can’t hurt people, that’s when a turd like Kirk gets shot.
When democracy and the law fail to reign in corporate greed and harm and cruelty, that’s when you get a Luigi.
When the press and civil society fail to stop a rising authoritarian, that’s when you get WWII.
6/
@datarama I really wish I could say the same.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.