Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 18:28:53 JST SuperDicq

   "they had no other choice mozilla is insanely under paid"
   
   HAHAHAHA

   • Johnny Peligro likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 18:31:24 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Evelyn fra denne andre øya

     @evelyn@misskey.bubbletea.dev Mozilla has more than enough money to maintain a browser.
     
     But they waste their money on a lot of bullshit and they aren't in financial peril at the moment, they are just greedy.

     Doughnut Lollipop 【記録係】:blobfoxgooglymlem: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Evelyn fra denne andre øya (evelyn@misskey.bubbletea.dev)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 18:31:25 JST Evelyn fra denne andre øya

     in reply to

     @SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo i'm sure the rest of the staff aren't being paid competitive salaries, but that'd be pretty easy to fix...

   • Embed this notice
     anime graf mays ?️? (graf@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 18:31:33 JST anime graf mays ?️?

     in reply to
     @SuperDicq what are your suggestions for browsers on android that support extensions, specifically ublock and that weird one that turns every website night mode
   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 18:31:33 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • anime graf mays ?️?

     @graf@poa.st Fennec

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 18:34:01 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Poppy (Back from tha dead) :neofox_flag_trans:

     @radmin@limepeeps.perchinup.top Mozilla is already making more revenue than ever. They don't need to do this. They don't need 500 million dollars to maintain a browser.

   • Embed this notice
     Poppy (Back from tha dead) :neofox_flag_trans: (radmin@limepeeps.perchinup.top)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 18:34:02 JST Poppy (Back from tha dead) :neofox_flag_trans:

     in reply to

     @SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo companies need revenue to surviveSo did slaveowners then and narcotics dealers now :neofox_middlefinger:

     Doughnut Lollipop 【記録係】:blobfoxgooglymlem: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 19:09:09 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Poppy (Back from tha dead) :neofox_flag_trans:
     • eliseo

     @eliseo01@fe.disroot.org @radmin@limepeeps.perchinup.top I honestly trust the The Wikimedia Foundation a lot more than Mozilla.
     
     Sure, the Wikimedia Foundation doesn't have a 100% perfect track record either and they make mistakes too (especially the way they raise funds). But I still believe that most of the things Wikimedia does are good things for the world.
     
     Mozilla however seems to be more interested in all sorts of things that nobody wants to see from Mozilla like web3 projects, "AI" bubble project, "privacy friendly" advertising technology, or literally anything that has nothing to do with maintaining a goddamn browser.

   • Embed this notice
     eliseo (eliseo01@fe.disroot.org)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 19:09:10 JST eliseo

     in reply to

     • Poppy (Back from tha dead) :neofox_flag_trans:
     @SuperDicq @radmin this reminds me of Wikipedia which funnily enough also sits comfortably at 500M bucks.
   • Embed this notice
     mk (mk@mastodon.satoshishop.de)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 19:59:04 JST mk

     in reply to

     @SuperDicq

     you probably didn't correct the salary for inflation.

     fiatmoney is garbage and easily devalues 50% in 20 years. you need to keep that in mind.

     "This table demonstrates the significant decrease in the purchasing power of the US dollar over time[..]97.3% loss in purchasing power[..]value has decreased by 37.57 times since 1900, meaning that today's prices are 37.57 times higher than they were in 19004"

     https://www.perplexity.ai/search/give-me-a-table-with-the-year-v4qzxZdXSpu0Ru5qgBuQ7Q

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 20:53:16 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Emil Jacobs - Collectifission

     @collectifission@greennuclear.online Just the CEOs salary alone should be enough money to pay en entire team of fulltime developers to maintain the entire browser.

   • Embed this notice
     Emil Jacobs - Collectifission (collectifission@greennuclear.online)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 20:53:18 JST Emil Jacobs - Collectifission

     in reply to

     @SuperDicq That's just the CEO though. What about the rest of the team?

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 21:06:24 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • mk

     @mk@mastodon.satoshishop.de With our without inflation it is obviously very clear that Mozilla can spend a little bit more money on browser development and a little bit less on everything else without any issues if they really wanted to.

   • Embed this notice
     mk (mk@mastodon.satoshishop.de)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 21:11:27 JST mk

     in reply to

     @SuperDicq

     how about these cunts start embrassing capitalism and roll out a paid version of mozilla without the spyware and advertising bullshit.

     if you want the free version, you have to deal with their bullshit, but give people the option to pay 5€/year to get a no-bullshit version !

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 21:14:08 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • mk

     @mk@mastodon.satoshishop.de It's not about money, it's about data.

   • Embed this notice
     mk (mk@mastodon.satoshishop.de)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 21:15:01 JST mk

     in reply to

     @SuperDicq

     "It's not about money"

     wtf are you talking about?

     YOU were complaining about ceo earning too much money and said "Mozilla can spend a little bit more money on browser development"

     of course is this about money.

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 21:16:08 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • mk

     @mk@mastodon.satoshishop.de I mean they want to collect data to train their bullshit AI projects probably.
     
     It's not about money because on paper Mozilla has enough money to maintain a browser if only they spent it better, they don't need to make more.

   • Embed this notice
     trisweb (trisweb@m.trisweb.com)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 21:23:03 JST trisweb

     in reply to

     • Emil Jacobs - Collectifission

     @SuperDicq @collectifission if they believe in AI so much, it should have no problem doing the job of CEO.

     Blurry Moon likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Blurry Moon (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 21:28:47 JST Blurry Moon

     in reply to

     • Emil Jacobs - Collectifission
     • trisweb
     @trisweb @SuperDicq @collectifission They could write the AI CEO in Rust, then it wouldn't make any mistakes.
   • Embed this notice
     Yomiel (yomiel@new.asbestos.cafe)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 22:40:21 JST Yomiel

     in reply to

     • Poppy (Back from tha dead) :neofox_flag_trans:
     • meso
     • eliseo
     @meso @SuperDicq @eliseo01 @radmin
     Hire the homophobic guy back for $14,888 dollars a year and he'll Make Mozilla Great Again
     Johnny Peligro likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     meso (meso@new.asbestos.cafe)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 22:40:22 JST meso

     in reply to

     • Poppy (Back from tha dead) :neofox_flag_trans:
     • eliseo
     @SuperDicq @radmin @eliseo01 their great new project, paying 8 million to a CEO that runs the company to the ground
   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 23:39:45 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • þernia

     @pernia@cum.salon I'm not of the opinion that everyone should always build everything for free. People need money, to live.
     
     I advocate for more people getting paid a professional salary to maintain a free software project, either commercially, through crowdfunding or government grants. It's always good thing.
     
     Also I'm not actually really an anti-capitalist. I just think our current form of capitalism is very broken because it allows unethical business practices and monopolies.

   • Embed this notice
     þernia (pernia@cum.salon)'s status on Friday, 28-Feb-2025 23:39:46 JST þernia

     in reply to
     @SuperDicq theres literally proyects that are just volunteers. They dont need money
   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Saturday, 01-Mar-2025 00:30:12 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Nicholas Conrad

     @nicholas@aklp.club I don't like judging something like this by its cover and know who or what this rebelliousdata.com is, so I clicked on their link to find out more so I can form a proper opinion about it and LOL LMAO

     narcolepsy and alcoholism :flag: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Nicholas Conrad (nicholas@aklp.club)'s status on Saturday, 01-Mar-2025 00:30:13 JST Nicholas Conrad

     in reply to

     • mk

     they want to collect data to train their bullshit AI projects

     I don't think it's that innocent. They've been removing features and firing devs and instead funding research into how to censor the open web for years now.

     https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/blog/fellow-research-decentralized-web-hate/

     And just recently they announced a whole brand refresh to make clear that they are not 'just a technology company', but rather a "global crew of activists".

     https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/mozilla-brand-next-era-of-tech/

     I think they want your data to identify wrongthinkers.

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Saturday, 01-Mar-2025 01:14:19 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • þernia

     @pernia@cum.salon You have a very misguided opinion about the GNU project.

   • Embed this notice
     þernia (pernia@cum.salon)'s status on Saturday, 01-Mar-2025 01:14:20 JST þernia

     in reply to
     @SuperDicq everyone should build what they want without expecting anything in return. You do it because its useful or cool to you, and you share it if it could be useful to someone else.
     
     I agree with paying open source devs, have an org that provides hardware infra salaries etc. But "funding" shouldnt be the end goal, in fact it leads exactly to the point where many proyects are because they become driven by external influences from parties that dont share the vision of the proyect.
     
     Also what allowd unethical business is the government and the jews.
     
     Tangentially Related:
     Behind every gnu nigger theres a disenfranchised commie with nothing to add, who wants to masturbate about "computer purity" as if the Machine was some sort of virginal maiden, while using it exclusively to watch childporn. They are worthless bags of shit and deserve nothing
   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Saturday, 01-Mar-2025 18:29:00 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Roxanne

     @d4rkness@beige.party If Mozilla isn't selling to advertisers then why does Firefox already contain a bunch of add?

   • Embed this notice
     Roxanne (d4rkness@beige.party)'s status on Saturday, 01-Mar-2025 18:29:08 JST Roxanne

     in reply to

     @SuperDicq isnt the drama severely overblown anyways? im pretty sure they arent even selling to advertisers or even hoarding data.

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 03:44:10 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Roxanne

     @d4rkness@beige.party Default Firefox actually contains ads and has done so for a long time. Most notably with "sponsored" links on the default new tab page. I'm not joking.

   • Embed this notice
     Roxanne (d4rkness@beige.party)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 03:44:12 JST Roxanne

     in reply to

     @SuperDicq it doesnt contain ads lmao

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 05:34:03 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Roxanne

     @d4rkness@beige.party What the hell are you talking about?
     
     You think they put companies like Amazon, Temu and TUI in there because they like them?
     
     It's because they give them money. This is the definition of adware.

     翠星石 likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Roxanne (d4rkness@beige.party)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 05:34:04 JST Roxanne

     in reply to

     @SuperDicq those arent ads lmao and they dont make money off those

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 05:55:03 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Roxanne

     @d4rkness@beige.party Nobody wants this, but it is included in the software. Even though you may consider this a small inconvenience it still tells us that Mozilla does not put the user first.

     翠星石 likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Roxanne (d4rkness@beige.party)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 05:55:04 JST Roxanne

     in reply to

     @SuperDicq thats barely an ad and its really easy to disable it fully, also its only just links to websites and not anything crazy.

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 05:59:16 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Roxanne

     @d4rkness@beige.party Mozilla should not be endorsing monopolistic companies like Amazon or Temu.
     
     This absolutely goes against the original Mozilla Manifesto where they pledged to only support and enable products that the same principles as them.

   • Embed this notice
     Roxanne (d4rkness@beige.party)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 05:59:18 JST Roxanne

     in reply to

     @SuperDicq its like the least invasive form of an ad and its super easy to disable it fully, also its links to their websites which can be very handy to use if you use those websites often.

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 06:03:06 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Roxanne

     @d4rkness@beige.party No, I use GNU IceCat instead because this browser actually follows the principles of the movement that maintains it.

     翠星石 likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Roxanne (d4rkness@beige.party)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 06:03:08 JST Roxanne

     in reply to

     @SuperDicq dude just turn off the sponsors in the fucking new page settings, its not that deep and its fucking ads on what is an otherwise empty ass page anyways, its not a big deal lmao

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 06:04:32 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Roxanne

     @d4rkness@beige.party There's the Mozilla Corporation and the Mozilla Foundation. The original purpose Mozilla Corporation exists to generate funds to maintain the ideals of the Mozilla Foundation which is non-profit.
     
     It was not meant to be profit seeking.

   • Embed this notice
     Roxanne (d4rkness@beige.party)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 06:04:34 JST Roxanne

     in reply to

     @SuperDicq mozilla is a fucking corporation what did you expect lmao

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 06:10:10 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Roxanne

     @d4rkness@beige.party What is wrong with the ideals of the GNU project?
     
     Do you think that proprietary software has a legitimate place in our society? Do you believe users should not be in charge of their own computing? If so, why?

     翠星石 likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Roxanne (d4rkness@beige.party)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 06:10:11 JST Roxanne

     in reply to

     @SuperDicq the GNU project arguably follows worse ideals than Mozilla

   • Embed this notice
      (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 18:19:32 JST 

     in reply to

     • Roxanne
     @d4rkness @SuperDicq One are a bunch of boomers just sticking to their software ideals, the other is https://archive.ph/Vbwqk.
   • Embed this notice
      (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 18:30:02 JST 

     in reply to

     • 
     • Roxanne
     @d4rkness @SuperDicq Actually, why I'm even suggesting that when the agenda is obvious.
     (You).jpg
     ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: likes this.