@grey >People might, big "might", finally leave Reddit wholesale and start making forums again Who am I kidding? Normalfags and the sophomoric techbros will keep using shitty programs and sites like Dicksore. The internet is dead.
By the way, this is why Reddit devs have been doing their damnedest to preventing FOSS third-party frontends from working.
One of my mutuals ran a based instance called wolfballs. The instance was one of 2 on Lemmy worth talking to, and to this day despite having been down for years most Lemmy instances block both by default.
> [Richard] Wallace's theory of A.I. is no theory at all. It's not that he doesn't believe in artificial intelligence, per se; rather, he doesn't much believe in intelligence, period. In a way that oddly befits a contest sponsored by a bunch of Skinnerians, Wallace's ALICE program is based strictly on a stimulus-response model. You type something in, if the program recognizes what you typed, it picks a clever, appropriate, "canned" answer. > There is no representation of knowledge, no common-sense reasoning, no inference engine to mimic human thought. Just a very long list of canned answers, from which it picks the best option. Basically, it's Eliza on steroids. > Conversations with ALICE are "stateless"; that is, the program doesn't remember what you say from one conversational exchange to the next. Basically it's not listening to a word you say, it's not learning a thing about you, and it has no idea what any of its own utterances mean. It's merely a machine designed to formulate answers that will keep you talking. And this strategy works, Wallace says, because that's what people are: mindless robots who don't listen to each other but merely regurgitate canned answers.
I think talking to them isn't just missing out on some boredom; I think it actually hurts your ability to think. You ever have a discussion with someone and it was clear they were not listening and were picking their responses out of a list of canned rebuttals? I mean, learned helplessness results from a feature of the brain: information that is not relevant is discarded, and information that is not actionable is not relevant. So you talk to those people long enough and all the thoughts that might occur to you during a normal conversation get quieter, the information that is relevant during a stupid internet argument gets louder: I think "stupid internet argument" is a symptom of a (contagious) cognitive disease.
@grey That is hilarious *but* consider that they're comparing it to Facebook; it might be technically correct to say that the average intelligence of any place that people post is higher than on Facebook.