nowhere have I "claimed" an "innate deficiency" of intelligence in blacks. My position on this question is clearly spelled out in my most recent book: "The plain fact is that at present there exists no scientifically satisfactory explanation for the differences between the IQ distributions in the black and white populations. The only genuine consensus among well-informed scientists on this topic is that the cause of the difference remains an open question." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Jensen#Criticism
IQ is largely genetic. I know one black guy that is extremely intelligent. He has a Ph.D. in physics / engineering. He designs medical lasers. He was highly intelligent even as a child.
His dad was an engineer (he ran CAD on a 386 when I was a kid). His mom was a biologist. The brother isn't nearly as intelligent, and in fact, used to literally drool on himself.
Some people win the genetic lottery, some don't, and on average, race is a factor in determining the odds.
I believe the largest cause of lower black IQ is kike propaganda directed at black people encouraging them to blame the white man and demand free stuff from White men instead of trying to succeed by actions other than blaming the White man. And not being told that it is the White looking kikes that keep them down when the White man is blamed
There might still be an IQ difference but the difference would be much less without such propaganda because they might try to study
It is an outlier. Other black kids in the same community, and even in the same household, did not turn out the same, which goes to my point. Genetics play the largest role. Adopted twin studies show this as well.
And one was told to blame the White man for all problems he had and to take as much stuff as he can from the white man instead of studying as the way to success
And the other one was told to study hard so he can learn how to make better decisions because better decisions lead to more success at goals
You do not think that one twin would be smarter than the other at most things for reasons other than DNA?
Adopted twin studies do not prove that because both black twins go to public schools that tell them to blame the white man and watch TV that tells them to blame the white man whether they are adopted by white or black parents
Both twins share the primary causal factor of low black IQ which is propaganda to blame the white man
So we need to have two identical twins and one is told that the Kikes were primarily to blame for the trans Atlantic slave trade and that they own the rap music industry and the other is to be told that White people are to blame for black people's problems and we should see if one twin has a higher IQ than the other twin
@Humpleupagus@shortstories@HarryNuggets Flashbacks to a call with Stef and an African dude who was a complete mental outlier in his family, that lived in and out of Britain in his childhood... I don't think I could dig it up. It was really interesting to listen to, but also kinda cursed.
@HarryNuggets@shortstories@Humpleupagus And like I’d tell the gab-holes: >So what you’re saying is the only physical attribute NOT determined by genetics is IQ. Also what I’d tell them: >Guessing you’ve never bought a dog before.
Most humans can achieve much beyond what they currently do in terms of intelligence but choose to remain ignorant in response to social factors due to propaganda
@Humpleupagus@EvilSandmich@HarryNuggets If people tell someone there will be another Holocaust if someone reads David Duke then people might be afraid to read David Duke's book Jewish Supremacism & not study it due to social undue influence
Different social factors may influence whether or not two different people with the same DNA would choose to study something
There might be exceptions in a small percent of humans that are genetically unable to study but most people genetically can study
The study does not prove It because both the adopted and non adopted black children receieved propaganda to blame white people for black problems
I am going to suggest that propaganda to blame white people for black problems does more to lower black IQ than any genetic difference between white people and black people although I am not denying the possibility of some genetic difference in the IQ test scores
@shortstories@EvilSandmich@Humpleupagus@HarryNuggets Gosh, it seems to me the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study really put that position to pasture. As far as IQ goes, it’s hard to find a more heritable trait, genetically speaking. I don’t deny culture and society have parts to play - but the data strongly suggests to me these are downstream of biology
The very fact that someone can take a IQ test without studying first and try to achieve the highest score they can then go back and study it and take the same test again and get a higher score proves that IQ test results are not 100% genetic
I am not denying the possibility that black people as a group tend to have a lower IQ due to genetic reasons but I would suggest that kike propaganda is to blame to a greater degree for the lower IQ
Black parents teach black culture to their black children
I would suggest that black culture is to blame for black problems
Various Kike information outlets also try to push a culture on black people
Even when black people are adopted by White parents the media outlets push a culture on these black people claiming their ancestors were enslaved by White Christians instead of primarily Kikes
@shortstories@Humpleupagus@HarryNuggets The back door you’re trying to sneak out is walled up. You concede that environmental factors impact other physical attributes (hair, skin color, bone density) but then try to cast IQ as malleable while it’s clear those other things are not.
It looks like you also tried the old “judge a group by its individuals” switcheroo which is as old as the hills. Groups are judged by group data, not by the anecdote of some individual.
You also duck out on the dog question as it’s clear that not only is intelligence genetic but also (largely) character attributes and overall physical potential.
In the end you agree completely with the left on race (I haven’t looked at your timeline, this may be deliberate, if so I apologize) as you also think that black failure is due completely to external circumstances.
There's actually a huge fucking irony here. Under your theory, you must buy into the idea that all people are equal, which is the very basis of the kike propaganda that White racism is to blame for all nigger problems. You are the kike propagandist.
I believe in Rockwell view of breeds and his question of why we use breeds of animals for various purposes and brag about it as a science and yet pretend humans are all equal. And yes he mentions outliers. I also wish I could believe my love of comfortable cotton briefs is the reason generations of niggers have been shooting each other and remaining illiterate and disgusting
And when making social policy, you generally can't rely on outliers. Law doesn't work that way. Law starts globally and then carves out very narrow exceptions. And if an exception swallows the rule, it's shit Law.
The causes of low IQ are, in order: Genetics Genetics Genetics also brain damage and drug abuse. IQ is pretty well fixed and is measurable by the age of three. It doesn't change significantly over the lifetime, except for a very gradual decline, mostly as the result of aging, drug abuse and minor brain damage accumulation. Parts of West Africa have an average 65 IQ. That qualifies as mentally retarded in the US. That's the average. It is inborn, congenital, and cannot be increased. Training a stupid person does not make them smart. It may make them better able to handle many tasks, but it will not make them smarter. Training them in the proper attitude towards Whites will not make them smart. They were born dumb. These are simple, demonstrable facts, supported by over 100 years of research into the nature of human intelligence. You would rather believe the fairy tale you were taught than the cold hard facts of life. Fairy tales make for incredibly bad policy
"So you could make maybe 80% of the population smarter at that subject than 80% of people with a PhD " No, you can't. You can, if they reach some minimum standard of intelligence, teach them more about a subject. That does not make them smarter. Do not confuse the ability to regurgitate facts with intelligence, or even understanding. Also, do not conflate "with a PhD" with any particular level of learning or intelligence. that's conflating classroom compliance with education, education with understanding, and understanding with intelligence.
@shortstories@EvilSandmich@Humpleupagus@HarryNuggets By that logic, if you had the right combination of teaching methods, motivation, and resources you could grab any random small child out of the ghetto, the back alleys of Mumbai, or some backwater village deep in the Congo, and turn that child into a brain surgeon or chess grand master or cutting edge mathematician. And the only thing holding us back from that bright, golden future is that we have yet to find that magical combination of teaching methods, resources, and means of motivating people.
But no one really believes that, not even you. Everyone knows in their gut that intelligence is like physical abilities. You can develop what you have more fully with the proper training, but ultimately we all have hard limits coded into us. If I trained like mad, was trained by the best coach, ate and exorcised exactly as I was supposed to, I could be made to be a better basketball player than I am. But I will never, ever, no matter how hard I train, make it to the NBA, or even a low ranked college team. I am too short, my reflexes too slow. My body isn't made to be a top level basketball player, and no amount of desire and training will over come that.
You can not make a person more intelligent than they are wired to be just like you can't make me a 6'8" power forward. You can help a person develop their intelligence such they can make the most of what they have, but you can't give them more than what they have, not without somehow rewriting their DNA.
People have limits, we are born with them. Life isn't some anime where you can train every day to become some kind of super human. Groups of people, being different, will inevitably have their own average intelligence level, just like average height, skin tone, eye color, speed, etc. You might hate it, but it is what it is.
So you could make maybe 80% of the population smarter at that subject than 80% of people with a PhD in any field you choose today with the right combination of training but if you apply that standard to everybody than they might raise the PhD standards so you would not get more PhDs
There might be less than 20% that can not achieve that genetically
Second time based ocean explorer refused to say who is meant by "you"
I am not going to argue with based ocean explorer whether or not I am a bot if based ocean explorer is going to demonstrate such poor reading comprehension willingly or by accident
@Quentel@EvilSandmich@HarryNuggets@Humpleupagus@KingOfWhiteAmerica@Sui@shortstories I was friends with some intellectuals you could say. They worked for tax agency in Spain. The moment you made a joke that was inappropriate or sounded not conforming to normal conversation they would just say what do you mean? They couldn’t understand anything outside of scope of normalcy
I am saying we need a different kind of intelligent test with harder material
And that they mask the true greatness of intellectual difference because they avoid hard subjects like vector caculus, physics, chemistry, and so on where the truly intelligent people could have time to shine
Have you ever taken an IQ test ? It’s coming across like you think it’s sort of like an SAT or something - which hasn’t been my experience with them at all.
The problem is the difference in human intelligence without kike propaganda is so vast that no test on earth today could possibly be advanced enough to measure it
Now Let's say maybe the white raw intelligence has been lowered by more than 80% but the black raw intelligence has been lowered by more than a higher percent it could explain part of the difference between white and black raw intelligence scores
But I would suggest that kike propaganda has done more to lower black intelligence tests scores then genetic differences between whites & blacks
Just how many points would you estimate that kike propaganda lowers their intelligence? It's going to have to be a substantial number to support this argument.
I would suggest that kike propaganda has lowered black, white, hispanic & asian raw intelligence scores by more than 80% of what it could be
So maybe if you multiply the average score by 5 it would exceed the maximum score on the raw intelligence test
But I believe if you used a hard enough test with enough questions where the current average score multiplied by 5 does not exceed the maximum then it would prove my point
@Humpleupagus@EvilSandmich@HarryNuggets@KingOfWhiteAmerica@Quentel@Sui@shortstories probably got some handler to intervene from time to time. It’s just a reboast bot about anything about jews. Every conversation will always stear to jews no matter the topic and every topic with jews named negatively will be reboasted. I don’t know if it’s to gather intelligence about users or something