@sickburnbro this is misleading because electric cars are driven less (according to the study) but they're more expensive. it doesn't have so much to do with the cost of energy or maintenance.
Correct. That aside, I find in interesting that hybrids are cheaper per mile than gas, but that plugin hybrid is more expensive than gas. I'm curious what is driving that extra cost. Larger batteries are my first thought.
@EssentialUtinsil@sickburnbro other studies have shown that gas prices have to be pretty astronomical for lifetime cost of an EV to be less than a gas vehicle, especially if you drive an EV long enough to kill the battery.
@EssentialUtinsil@teknomunk the lower cost of hybrids versus gas makes me feel like the average size of hybrids being more priusy is effecting those numbers.
@sickburnbro@EssentialUtinsil electric moves a lot slower than gas, I know ours are statutorily limited and the government has to approve price hikes. The fuel cost absolutely is almost always cheaper for electrics but unless you’re doing a new lease every 3 years and eating the $800 a month you’re not just paying for fuel
@sickburnbro@sapphire yeah for sure, but that is already highly variable depending on location. in the US, a kWh is between about 10 and 25 cents (hawaii is almost 35 but an outlier). average american drives around 35miles a day, most EVs use somewhere in the neighborhood of .3kWh/mile so you'd have to increase electricity cost quite a bit to make that unaffordable. it's currently only a buck or two a day going on averages.
@sickburnbro@EssentialUtinsil and again, this is assuming a modified eco diesel and you’re still having to claw pennies and percents to try to get in the same ballpark
Your 30mpg standard shitbox has no chance of getting price per mile parity on fuel alone.
@sapphire@EssentialUtinsil remember, when you have plug in, you have kWh at the wall, which goes into your step up, which uses energy, it charges battery, which uses energy, you drive ev, battery uses energy to produce voltage .. then you get motor turning.
@sickburnbro@EssentialUtinsil yes and all of that adds up to about half* the dollar per mile compared to an average gasser, or about 15% less than my aggressively eco tuned street illegal diesel
@sapphire@EssentialUtinsil I have yet to see any numbers I find convincing on ev cost, in terms vehicle energy going in at plug versus miles driven where it isn't a simulated environment.
@sickburnbro@EssentialUtinsil I just provided you the most pessimistic numbers I could crunch against my literal supersipper, you can’t convince me that if I had a maintenance provided free EV that I wouldn’t pay less than any pure ICE car on the planet and honestly I’d only fight over one hybrid they don’t make anymore.
@sickburnbro@sapphire I'm an electrical engineer, I'm aware. If it takes 120kWh to charge a 100kWh battery, ok...at .20 a kWh that's a $4 loss on what, a 300mile charge?
@EssentialUtinsil@sapphire because all batteries have leakage, so we need to define the characteristics of the test scenario in order to start getting to the mileage.
@sickburnbro@EssentialUtinsil back of the napkin math on the least efficient EV according to motortrend vs the most efficient car I have personal experience with
@sapphire@EssentialUtinsil right, I get it but that's what I've said - I don't trust any manufacture or government numbers. All I trust is a magazine or organization or something that runs an actual real world test and has raw data available.
@sickburnbro@EssentialUtinsil these are all real world data I pulled from the most pessimistic sources possible (for the EV) or my own experience (for my shitbox Volkswagen)
You can seethe all you want but this is quite literally the worst possible EV scenario I could find
@sapphire@EssentialUtinsil if asking for varied test cases with raw data is seething, I can do nothing but shrug my shoulders as to where we are as a society.
@sickburnbro@sapphire I have nothing against EV as a technology, it has limitations and still needs improvement and refinement. It can be better than ICE in some cases, worse in other cases. I hate the propaganda and social engineering behind it though.
@sickburnbro@EssentialUtinsil yes it does, people have been doing real world tests of EVs for close to 10 years now. Not my fault if you’re too lazy to look for them, or that they didn’t connect all the dots for you so you, god forbid, actually have to think for yourself
@sapphire@EssentialUtinsil I'm not concerned with ideals, because I know all players in these spaces are fucking liars, even VW with their gaming of EPA numbers on their turbodiesels.
What I want to see is what I have said I want to see - more data, because the amount anecdotal stories which conflict with the official line mean there is a story to find.
@sickburnbro@sapphire ok. I wasn't saying you should. all I said was the study in your OP was misleading, and mass adoption would actually improve the specific thing in the study (purchase price normalized to average usage)
@teknomunk@EssentialUtinsil@sapphire I was once excited about new battery technologies, but the thing to keep in mind is we landed on lithium because guys doing battery work tried a lot of other things before they got there.
That means if a simpler cleaner material isn't being used, there almost certainly is a reason why.
I might believe there are massive battery cost savings at scale once *sodium ion has a density closer to lithium ion, but even then, I don't think there are desired gains and what gains there are won't be fast regardless of how much demand there is or how much money is thrown at the problem.
* sodium ion is one of the few upcoming battery tehcnologies I have my eyes on, because the primary component comes from table salt (sodium being the Na in NaCl), and we have a lot of it everywhere the ocean is, so material availability won't be a limit on scaling for a very long time
@EssentialUtinsil@sapphire@sickburnbro it won't be that simple if everyone has an EV. the US grid needs to be expanded to the tune of 500% to support full adoption, or else it needs to be expanded like 100% or so and then have really aggressive price spikes to control demand
power plant fuel could be free and they would still have to do this because there's only so much peaking capacity in the grid
@sapphire@sickburnbro yeah, the cost of energy isn't the thing to really argue about, EV does win that, even if the price of electricity goes up in the future (which also raises the cost of fossil fuel). Maintenance and durability would seem the more obvious contest.
Nobody will tell you this but they only did this because US environmental regulations on diesels are actually unattainable, were something like 50x more strict than Europe
Agreed. Batteries are one of the last things to get excited about, in large part because development is extremely slow. I've been watching sodium ion technology for years and there are just now starting to be batteries I can order.
I think rechargable batteries are a pretty neat use of physical phenomena, but it's easy to abstract away your doing a ton of chemical reactions all the time, and they can be extremely sensitive to a lot of things.
It probably will, but only after another 10-15 years of R&D, economies of scale, etc. It's just not quick, and government interventionism makes it worse because government interventionism makes EVERYTHING worse.
The thing about substantial engineering effort is that there's a time component that you just can't get around.
For all the talk you hear about breakthroughs, real world technological progress is astonishingly linear. You can generally put a ruler on a chart and declare that in 2035, batteries will be this cheap and this efficient.
There will come a point at which this tech actually makes economic sense and when that point comes, it's going to be a LCD TV moment where suddenly everyone just switches. But it's going to take longer than the EV fanboys want to believe.
@cjd it's worse than that. Assuming a linear relationship between time and lithium ion battery energy density means that given enough time the density goes to infinity.
It just means we are in a region that is easily approximated by a straight line. The actual path is probably something closer to an S-curve with a maximum value that is never reachable.
@teknomunk@cjd yes, and if you realize that batteries are older than internal combustion engines, it should make you careful about extending the line too far.