@EmmaFaber@Fullycaffeinated >Aquinas wasn't all that clever >quotemining prooftext from a guy who wrote treatises with expanded dialectal analysis. Big brain on you, huh? 🤣
@BowsacNoodle@Fullycaffeinated AQUINAS "With respect to the particular nature the female is something defective and occasionatum, for the active force in the male semen intends to produce a perfect likeness of itself in the male sex; but if a female should be generated, this is because of a weakness of the active force, or because of some indisposition of the material, or even because of a transmutation [brought about] by an outside influence"
Now we all know the Y chromosome was once an X Chromosome until it got hijacked by some unknown parasite that adapted it by injecting it's own material into it & dumping everything else in it couldn't use & the X Chromosome became less, it became a shell of it former self & the parasite adapted the X Chromosome to accommodate it's own descendents until they can invade a woman's body and develop inside her, feeding off all her resources .
So Aquinas is part right in his claim, but he just happen to pick the wrong sex, that's all
@EmmaFaber@Fullycaffeinated >Now we all know the Y chromosome was once an X Chromosome until it got hijacked by some unknown parasite that adapted it by injecting it's own material into it & dumping everything else in it couldn't use & the X Chromosome became less, it became a shell of it former self & the parasite adapted the X Chromosome to accommodate it's own descendents until they can invade a woman's body and develop inside her, feeding off all her resources.
Sexual dimorphism won over hermaphroditism. I've yet to hear a convincing evolutionary argument for this that doesn't delve into pure conjecture and further constrain Darwinian narratives. But to the subject at hand, Aquinas wrote arguments and analyzed them. Simply quoting something he wrote down, as if a single sentences can be analogous to a thesis statement, is all but useless. But on the topic, he wrote opinions that were fairly reasonable in his day.
@EmmaFaber@Fullycaffeinated Hey that didn't address my point at all and actually you're giving more grounds for the matter. Hermaphroditic reproduction would be required for your beliefs. Why is almost every vertebrate species gonochoric rather than hermaphroditic? I can't actually think of any that aren't.
@BowsacNoodle@Fullycaffeinated Aquinas got his idea from Aristotle? The idea the female solely exists because she originated from the male? So what we want to know what part of the female is male? All the chromosomes are pairs.. two of each except the X chromosome which had it's identical partner tampered with & it became a Y chromosome & it sole purpose is to create a male
Our genes contain the instructions on how to "build" our bodies. There is a particular order to how the different organs & body parts develop & there isn't a separate set of instructions for creating female or male limbs, or stomach or nipples?
There are no separate set of instructions to create male and female genitalia and reproductive organs. Oh my who knew that? The "default" set of instructions will create female reproductive organs and genitalia and it will never deviate from that
But if a Y chromosome is there it will intervene & suppress some of those instructions & modify them so a male has a chance to exist instead of a female, cos what the Y chromosome actually is, is a body snatcher and it suppresses that which in nature would otherwise 100% of the time produce a female, so the male is something alien to the 100% real deal bonafide human the female..
The male can't exist without both a Y & an X chromosome where the female exist entirely on her XX
The male can't go it solo and just rely on his Y Chromosome to get by, unlike the female who is solo on her X cos if the male tried to go it solo with just his Y to prop him up all he would be is pond life.. yeah the male is just one chromosome away from being a yoghurt
@narada@BowsacNoodle@Fullycaffeinated Nothing pleases the male more than shoving his patriarchy down the females throat and watching her choke on it
Nothing pleases males more than firing their biological weapons into females and watching them die long lingering deaths
& that is how men bond with each other & show their male allegiance to each other across the world and have throughout their male history and it's not a secret.. yeah & it is no secret how much collectively you men hate females and have an urge to swarm all over them and butcher them.. & men have always classed that one act as a glorious male sport they can all get right behind & unite on & join in on and nothing else comes to close to men all uniting as one in the name of their manhood than that one single act
Men's real goal in life is to unite as one and slaughter the 100% real deal humans otherwise known as the female human race
Watch that Survivor episode where it was women vs men. You creatures literally can't even feed yourselves without male guidance. Forgive your father already
@BowsacNoodle@Fullycaffeinated So the male for most of his history has asserted the female solely exists because she is part male?
So which bit of her is male?
The only chromosome that makes the male male is the Y Chromosome so that means all other chromosomes must exist outside of that & are there4 of female origin.
The female exists without the Y & is solo but THE MALE CAN'T go it solo just with his Y as he cant EXIST WITHOUT the X
Females are the original sex from which males are just a deviation & if there was no Y Chromosome the male would automatically develop into a female as nature had intended
& the Y Chromosome acts as a body snatcher & interrupts the birth of a female & suppresses that which would otherwise create a female & it takes the female form, rejigs it to accommodate it self & hey presto u have the male?
The origin of the male is that of an unknown parasite and is why he hangs on to his 100% real deal human host like grim death because he knows without her, he is actually a great big nothing.. he could exist as some tiny organism in a swamp but he could never actually exist in human form..
@narada@EmmaFaber@BowsacNoodle@Fullycaffeinated God created men to work to support their wife and women to produce offspring and support their husband. This egalitarian idea that all people are the same (or in your case female supremacy) is retarded and unnatural.
Men and women complement each other and have different roles.
@narada@BowsacNoodle@Fullycaffeinated men build up their own self esteem by smashing down the females and that is their male tradition & that is how men elevate the significance of themselves in their man's world
You're literally calling men not real humans as you talk about how men feel they have to tear down women to feel good about themselves. You lack the most basic forms of awareness to distinguish your own mind and thoughts from those of others
@BowsacNoodle@Fullycaffeinated we are explaining why the male has a history of murdering the female because from the out set that was always his ancestors one goal
@Will2Power@narada@BowsacNoodle@Fullycaffeinated men felt the urgent need to invent gods to excuse themselves for all the crimes they were committing against females and nothing alter in their tiny little male brains that are controlled by their cocks
@EmmaFaber@narada@Will2Power@Fullycaffeinated My brain is bigger than yours. Hey Emma, why are all the best chess players on Earth male? It's not like there's any physical thing preventing a female from competing evenly with a male... unless?
Holy shit Emma! All these years on this planet, and I thought women were for advancing our progeney. From now on, I will make it my mission in life to hunt women for sport and mount their heads on my wall. Hell, I might even cook and eat one. No more, love, care, devotion, and loyalty from this lad. Thank you, for introducing me to a simpler, animalistic life. Yer a peach!
Well they stick their claws and teeth into their female captives and skin them alive & hold them up as their most precious prize trophies of all and it is all matter of male honour and male pride, century in and century out & nothing changes in a man's world it all remains exactly the same
cos men are here to swarm all over females and kill them and that is their real goal in their male lives and every other goal they supposedly have is pure subterfuge
@EmmaFaber@narada@Will2Power@Fullycaffeinated >In a man's world (cope) >seething because rules exist and don't bend to female privilege. better stop because you'll be malding soon.
@narada@BowsacNoodle@Will2Power@Fullycaffeinated oh in a man's world the male is always classed as the positive and the female classed as the negative, cos if you aren't born male in a man's world then you are not born anyone at all.. according to men
@BowsacNoodle@narada@Will2Power@Fullycaffeinated Judit Polgar has been ranked as the world's number one female chess player for 23 years Judit Polgar has defeated nine world champions including Garry Kasparov, Boris Spassky and Viswanathan Anand, and is the only female ever to join an exclusive coterie of players rated above 2700 by the World Chess Federation. When Polgar won the Boys Under 14 section of the World Youth Chess Festival in 1990, one columnist wrote approvingly that it was easy to forget that Polgar was " just a girl."
In 2002, Polgar finally defeated Garry Kasparov, who had previously described her as "talented but not greatly talented,'' explaining that "women by their nature are not exceptional chess players ... not great fighters," in a 1990 interview with The New York Times. But in a game Polgar described as "one of the most remarkable moments" of her career, she won in 42 moves. Kasparov later credited the Polgars' career success in a chapter on anti-complacency tactics in his book, "How Life Imitates Chess." "By seeking out and often besting the toughest competition," he wrote, "the Polgars showed that there are no inherent limitations to their aptitude -- an idea that many male players refused to accept until they had unceremoniously been crushed by a twelve-year-old with a ponytail." "My sister Susan -- she was 16 or 17 -- said that she never won against a healthy man. After the game, there was always an excuse: 'I had a headache. I had a stomach ache.' There is always something" aw pua males Judit Polgár in 1991 achieved the title of Grandmaster at the age of 15 years & 4 months, the youngest person ever to do so at that time. She first defeated an International Master, Dolfi Drimer, at age 10, & a Grandmaster, Vladimir Kovacevic, at age 11. She also had to face prejudice because of her sex. "She has fantastic chess talent", said Kasparov. "but she is, after all, a woman. It all comes down to the imperfections of the feminine psyche. No woman can sustain a prolonged battle
@d0c40r0@narada@BowsacNoodle@Will2Power@Fullycaffeinated So the world is a man's world and he should go out and experience everything in it it has to offer and his world should never be limited while women's world should be confined to viewing from inside four walls, as the only reason females exists in a man's world is to be men's domestic and sexual slaves and they should always live in servitude to men
and is why they say as children grow, a boys world expands, while a girls world shrinks right down to that of the size of a tiny little coffin & she mustn't venture out alone, cos she will be butchered by the scum of the earth who find it difficult to control themselves whenever they see a bit of female flesh & they have an immediate urge to jump on it & pound it to death.. pua men there entire male goal in life is to butcher the female in more ways than one and its no secret and never has been
Christianity on wives: "Husbands, love your wives, and be not bitter against them" "Nevertheless, let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself" "A gracious woman retaineth honour" "Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies. The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil" ... "Strength and honour are her clothing; and she shall rejoice in time to come. She openeth her mouth with wisdom; and in her tongue is the law of kindness." "let not the husband put away his wife" "Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence"
but yeah Christianity is about excusing supposed crimes against females
@EmmaFaber@narada@Will2Power@Fullycaffeinated Emma, we're talking about chess. Quit your gish gallop. Every time you ignore my point, you're just conceding that you can't address it. Still no womyn chess champion. A bit odd, isn't it? Almost like there might be differences in hardware.
@BowsacNoodle@narada@Will2Power@Fullycaffeinated Throughout history men are known more for attacking females than protecting them and collectively the only thing men have ever really protected are their own self interests first second and last and is why we can hear men all over the world running around screaming
"We men are in charge, we men are in charge and if you women refuse to obey us men then we will rape & kill you, cos that is what we men are here for & we are only restraining ourselves at the moment to lull you into a false sense of security.. so you women had better obey us men or else, it is a death sentence for you?"
I love how “kill those who would rise up against you after you fought them in war but leave the women alive (except for those who have had husbands, as they would be miserable and cause nothing but trouble)” becomes “God condones rape” in the mind of the mentally disabled
@EmmaFaber@d0c40r0@narada@BowsacNoodle@Fullycaffeinated Lot is not an example of a perfectly virtuous person nor are many of the people in the Old Testament. Jesus is perfect and for example demands that an adulteress not be stoned to death in the New Testament.
The common atheist argument is to take out of context excerpts from the Old Testament, that are not part of the New Covenant, and pretend that's what Christians today believe.
Glad I'm not an atheist anymore. There's a reason why all the e-Atheists only debate midwits and not actual theologians.
I‘ve only seen a couple cases of women going out of their way to kill rapists but there are hundreds in recent history of men doing it
Your shitty graphics with poor grammar and writing in comic sans that I’d surmise is meant to be a quote doesn’t change the fact I’d gladly kill anyone who laid a hand on my mother or woman in a heartbeat. It also proves nothing in terms of tolerance for rape
"why don't you kill us as well? and men's reply was obviously
"Oh we intend to kill you by slow torture as that is what we men class as our biggest male perk in times of war and we intend to terrorise and torture you mentally & physically for years and years & you will never escape it unless you kill yourselves and we know over time many of you will and that will only make us men laugh ever louder, cos we men are mental cases like that?"
@d0c40r0@narada@BowsacNoodle@Will2Power@Fullycaffeinated Do you know what happened to women during the partition of India and Pakistan? The men on both sides all had a party and enjoyed themselves by cutting off the women's breasts and making the women dance around while they bled to death.. and how the men all laughed to themselves then is exactly the same way men laugh today while watching women & girls being physically and mentally tortured in porn Men' have devoted their entire male history to butchering the female and her image to boost their own image & their own morale in their little male minds
Everything men wanted to do to women, men legalised, raping women and girls became legal, cornering them became a male sport, forcing them to sign vows to obey men became obligatory!
Men legalised all of their sordid sleazy slimy sadistic sexual tendencies so they could justify them to themselves and is why they wrote all their religions to promote their sick sordid tendencies of believing they are godlike and entitled to abuse females, verbally, physically, socially, politically, sexually & mentally This is men’s entire history and it is not an exception in it, it's the main feature of it and men don't want their male world to ever be any other way.. cos when they have women & girls cornered they all love to go in for the kill..
let's go through case by case 1) Indians and Pakistanis are shitskins 2) "french" from Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia are shitskins 3) America was and is a land of decaying morals, and most of the rapes were committed by shitskins
Now let's talk about the rest of it 1) Raping women and girls is not in fact legal, hell there have been many cases where women have admitted that the guy they put in jail did nothing and he's still left to rot for another 20 years 2) you are not forced to sign any vows, if you're referring to marriage the vows are reciprocated, and they can be broken under modern law 3) women can leave in most if not all cases -- womens shelters are common and extremely well funded, especially compared to mens shelters which do not exist because people claim sexism even though rates of abuse are similar (pic attached, graphic from CDC) 4) I know this wasn't mentioned but a contributing factor to the degradation of women is pornography, which is jew-controlled
@BowsacNoodle@Sui@narada@ApocalyptoLatte1488@d0c40r0@Will2Power@Fullycaffeinated the second a woman or child goes missing everyone's first assumption is they have either been kidnapped by a man or a gang of them & the men r either holding them captive & doing terrible things to them or have already done that & killed them! & 9 times out of 10 the public are absolutely correct in their assumption.. So why is that?
Women's fear of men, is not paranoia, not a phobia but based on a very real danger men pose to them
& as a collective, men are a real threat to women & children & what we know about u men is u have a very long history of a want to attack women & butcher them & that desire is something you all stop holding back in times of war.. and that is the thing isn't it? Women's history is totally different to men's because in women's history women always face the opposite end of the gun barrel to men and ones perspective is everything isn't it?
and is why reason and reality will never affect a misogynists opinion cos he knows he and his sex are as guilty as fuck & he & they have no intention of ever admitting it.. cos they are all brave like that
people who kidnap are going to be more likely to rape than the general population
saying "90% of men rape women" is wrong, it's actually "90% of men who show complete disregard for people as a whole and break laws regarding human health and safety rape women"
@Sui@narada@ApocalyptoLatte1488@d0c40r0@BowsacNoodle@Will2Power@Fullycaffeinated most women and girls who are murdered by men are murdered by them for one reason.. so the men can achieve erections and that is it.. & Erections mean that much to men, many of them will merrily commit any crime no matter how horrendous in order to achieve them
I know men killed them, I'm just saying that your statement "oh look all these women are dying the horror of it all" is retarded when it's substantially less than the amount of men who are dying
Haha oh cue the "men don't get custody in divorce court" bullshit lies. Then the "the whole gubbbment is gooder to ladies and poor menz don't get nuffin." Hahaa here it comes...
Reality: men are criminals whether they have uptight parents eating din din at 7pm sharp every night or single mothers or grandparents or foster parents. Men are just criminals and ya only have yourself to blame. Maybe be better.
"men murdering men have nothing to do with us" 70% of inmates in state juvie serving long sentences were raised by single mothers, maybe yall should be better
@ForbiddenDreamer@Sui@d0c40r0@narada@ApocalyptoLatte1488@BowsacNoodle@Will2Power@EmmaFaber@Fullycaffeinated Feminism is like the peak of modern zogbot narcissism. Simultaneously the greatest victims and greatest heroes in the world, at least in their own heads. Now that Shlomo cut them off from jew money power and cast them out from the top of the progressive stack they're down at the bottom with White men and they haaaate it. As it turns out, most (if not all) of feminisms organizing was done for them by jew money and connections (the glowie and ngo circuit). These wamen were never the steely eyed revolutionaries they were taught to think themselves to be, they're the spoiled whore faildaughters of history, accustomed to getting their way whenever they throw a tantrum. They're pure cancer, a relic of the first 75 years of the jewish American world order, soon to be replaced by the horde of castiza and mena whore successdaughters who lust for a tall blue eyed husbandt. Leave them to wail in agonizing self pity as the brown horde consumes them.
I'm guessing homicides with the victims aged 0+ would flip those lines around. Mothers are way more likely to kill their kids than fathers are IIRC, and if you added in abortions... Well, that's like 800-900k a year to one side.