I mean yeah, if you’re friendly with someone that looks the other way for a literal convicted and registered child sex offender, I’m going to criticise you.
I'm not on Poast. You are constantly accusing people of being pedophiles and pedophile supporters if you decided you think they "associate" with "people who associate with pedophiles."
You’re misrepresenting the facts and situation, and you admit you don’t even know what you’re talking about. Rather than trying to determine that, you’re trying to discredit me with false allegations. I find that very suspicious.
That's not what you did. I still have no clue what you're talking about. I know you have some beef w poast, a platform I don't use and have little knowledge of. I have some people there who follow my work. You accuse random people of being pedophile supporters and enablers, some who have probably done more work to combat and expose pedophiles than yourself. How many exposes and articles have you written about child sex trafficking? Did you provide daily coverage of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial? I did that here on NCD. You trashed the admin of this platform because you think he associated with someone who associated with someone you claim covered for a convicted pedophile. It's retarded and stupid. Tell me what you've done to help victims of pedophiles.
The drunk thing is called banter, because you were being dumb and dramatic.
Let me put it this way tho. Let’s say you ran an instance, and you were friendly with another instance admin that hosted and looked the other way for a convicted and registered child sex offender, and that also had a loli posting pedo co-admin.
Would I be justified in saying, “Hey Radix, it’s p sus you’re friendly with that guy, you shouldn’t do that”? Is that a reasonable concern in your opinion? How would you respond?
I find you to be a dumb stupid cunt. You misrepresent things all the time. You accused me of being drunk earlier. I'm a mother and I do not drink alcohol. That didn't stop you from running your mouth, rather than trying to determine that, you tried to discredit me with false accusations. I find that suspicious.
@RadixVerum@Darbzilla@NonPlayableClown@bot@kroner I can't see who you're arguing with but I have a good idea. These people don't actually care about exposing pedophiles. They just want to throw the accusation around and stir shit among other users.
Well, I’m afraid that’s a retarded opinion. You’re also being dramatic again, I didn’t say Matty is guilty of anything, it’s just sus that he’s friendly with someone like that. I’m also not “claiming” the chomo in question is a convicted pedophile, he was doxed, including his sex offender registry entry.
No I do not think your retarded idea of guilt by association is reasonable. I think you try to shame people into doing what you want, like a lot of women. Matty can talk to anyone he wants. Graf can also. That doesn't make them pedophiles or pedophile supporters. If you have a problem with graf associating with someone you claim is a convicted pedophile then take it up with him and him alone. That is what makes sense to me and sounds reasonable. I don't vet every person I meet online's entire friend group, to expect that is retarded.
Anyway, if someone told me “hey I host a website, and I allow and encourage ppl to post pedophile porn of little girls and look the other way for chomos”, I would not be friends with that person, or anyone who is.
But that’s just me, you do you love… :acat_really:
You did accuse him of condoning pedophilia, I remember it well. I have talked to 2 of Epstein's victims. I have covered child sex trafficking for years. I have written articles and made videos to educate people about this. I don't think you actually care about this topic. You seem to only talk about it when complaining about a random niche obscure internet platform. There are people on here who are not terminally online and are normal.
To condone something means to approve of and sanction something. You know what the word means. You're not familiar with my journalistic work yet you run your mouth about me not "caring about truth" when I have done more to help victimized people than you. My work is highly relevant, seeing as though I am actually helping people. Real victims. I do care about truth and my years of work reflects that.
According to Cambridge, to "condone" means to accept and allow wrong behavior, or to approve and sanction it, as I said. Further, looking into the Latin etymology of the word, it comes from condonare, to "absolve." Matty does not accept or allow lolicon on his platform. He does not allow pedophiles to use his platform (as much as his limited knowledge of his users allows). He certainly isn't out here absolving pedophiles of their sins. So show me where your use of that word was correct.
Ok professor, so given those definitions, if you have a friend that is engaging in wrong or immoral behaviour and you overlook it and continue to be friends with them despite it, is it correct to say you are condoning that behaviour?
Ok professor, what constitutes "wrong" or "immoral" behavior? Do you know someone that isn't a sinner that you can point me to? Are you saying no one should associate with anyone else who someone claims is "engaged" in "immoral" behavior. You lied about me earlier and accused me of being drunk. That's immoral. Now anyone who associates with you or has even talked to you on friendly terms is now complicit in your immorality. Is that how this works?
Matty isn’t, but he’s condoning that behaviour. The proof is out there, the confirmed convicted and registered child sex offender in question is @g117ch (there has been more than one on the PPN).
Again, you don’t know all the facts, you’re just sperging rn because you’re retarded, you’re not actually interested in the truth because you’re biased. Graf was informed about the chomo and did nothing about it, and Matty is friendly with graf.
Those are the facts, and yes, overlooking that is condoning. That’s what that word means, we covered this already.
No he's not "condoning" or sanctioning child sex offenders. That user was never on NCD. Lolicon isn't allowed on NCD. Porn isn't allowed on NCD thus that behavior isn't condoned on NCD or by Matty.
If your claim is that graf "condoned" this, where is your proof for that claim?
Are all instances that federate w poast also now "condoning pedophilia" because you claim a pedo used poast?
Your claim is that Graf "condones" pedophilia because there was a pedo that used poast and so Matty has talked to Graf so that means he somehow "condones" Graf "condoning" pedophilia?
Poast's rules have a loop hole allowing for loli and toddlercon.
Matter of fact I defederated a user a couple days ago (who iirc has been on there a while named "ehhh") that someone flagged to me who had posted anime drawings of what looked like 5 yo sucking a penis. This isn't the first time I have had to do something like that.
So graf -does but does not- allow it wink wink nod nod.
However, her extrapolating that to matty being ok with it is nonsense. By that standard every single one of us on the fedi condones it just by being present and not saying something to every single loli poster.
I often ponder @bot's ultimate motives here. To me it seems just to generate contention and drama. I've also asked for evidence the response will be vague "See for yourself" - "You liked the anime pictures too!!!"
🤨 That's not how evidence works.
If bot actually wants to convince us of wrong doing - compile the proofs.
It will never have proof of anything or make any sense. If Matty "condoned" lolicon he would allow it on NCD - he does not. This isn't difficult to understand.
matty doesn't condone it and never has. He has no control over what graf does and does not allow. there are good users on poast which is why we have taken the approach of "deal with individuals"
I think the proof is in the pudding when matty has nuked entire instances which are dedicated to nothing but loli.
I linked you the username of the chomo, you can easily find everything from that. Aren’t you a journo? I thought you knew how to conduct investigations.
Radix doesn’t actually care about the truth in this situation, he’s sooooo buttmad and seething to protect his friends that he won’t even allow one ounce of criticism to filter through. He’s literally coping and seething about the definitions of words ffs.
graf was definitely made aware of the registered sex offender and convicted child molester using Poast and refused to ban them. Graf blindly believed the chomo's lies that it was a "small age difference." If they truly want proof I can show them, but they must ask and apologize to you if they find the proof to be convincing.
Ohhh here we go LMAO, now everything’s photoshopped and you won’t do your own digging because it’s not “worth your time”. What a bunch of disingenuous bs, wtf.
Matty doesn’t just talk to graf btw, stop your gaslighting and lies. Ask Matty publicly if he is friends with graf.
No I'm not apologizing to her for saying my friend condones pedophilia because he has talked to Graf. If this is true, and you can provide actual evidence for your allegations and not simply screen shots that can be photoshopped but actual archived links to show this actually happened. If you do that and I am satisfied it is legitimate, I will denounce Graf as a retard but I will still maintain that does NOT mean every single person Graf has talked to "condones" pedophilia. That's a retarded position.
I wouldn't go that far to say graf condones pedophilia. I will dm you shortly. Graf is definitely a retard though and this truth grows more widespread every day.
I really don’t feel like giving you classes in English rn. I said “I just want them to stop being disingenuous and associating with evil ppl”, at least one of those applies to you, and two apply to Matty. I’ll try to think of a simpler and more elementary example for you.
I already provided where you can find it with a two second search. His @ is g117ch and his name is Nathaniel Davies. I’m on my phone so I don’t have all of that rn but it’s super easy to find, you’re just dishonest.
Which part? That two of poa.st's admins were into lolicon cp? That one of them posted lolicon pornography on poa.st multiple times? That g177ch, a former poa.st member was a convicted pedophile who raped a 13-14 year old girl and that graf and the poast inner circle knew he was a convicted pedo and simply took him at his word that he dindu? That matty is aware of this stuff yet still on good terms with graf? Is it just the last part that you object to or do you not believe the rest?
I haven't seen any evidence for any of this. I don't know Graf. I'm not on poast. I asked this retard to substantiate it's allegations and it refuses to do that and it just keeps sperging. Go ahead and provide archived links for this paragraph of text and I'll go through it all and I will weigh the evidence.
Unlike bot, who isn't real, I have reported on pedophiles for years. I love exposing pedophiles. This retard made claims and I asked it to substantiate them with verifiable evidence. It sperged and continues to sperg so I refuse to engage with it. I have said I welcome evidence if anyone else feels inclined to provide it. I have to be able to verify what it's claiming. It demands non terminally online people understand it's "lore" that it insists I am fully aware of but am just pretending to not know what the fuck it's going on about.
I can’t remember his name but bot was the one who I remember seeing post about it first. He was a registered sex offender and the victim was a 13 year old girl. I remember a lot of people on poast caping for him as well as other fedi admins going “well, actually this ain’t so bad”. There was even a piece on an antifa blog at the time.
Yeah, report him to local authorities for violating his terms of registry by being on social media and then ban him. Instead him and a bunch of other people caped for him saying shit like “it’s not that bad” or “he’s changed as a person”. the fact that antifa fags were able to pick it up like that is also embarrassing.
The proof of graf knowing about this and refusing to act comes from the dm leaks of poast. I do not know of a link to download them right now. There's a lot of stuff in them and I made a thread a while back about it (this is graf's dms to g117ch, after evidence came out that he was a pedo: https://seal.cafe/@KitlerIs6/posts/AW4GuXjlptngHnNA6i), as did colonelj (screenshot is graf's dms to terry).
If you want harder proof that these dms took place, ask me in the morning.
It should be noted that it takes literally 5 minutes to figure out his victim was 13 or 14 from his sex offender registry (second screen shot linked in the original dox): https://sor.tbi.tn.gov/details/00516008
I'm going to bed now, if you have any questions I'll probably check the fedi again some time tomorrow or the weekend.