it's pretty interesting how bot thinks an innocent image of an anime character is "sexualizing children" but uses the same image as her avatar. pedo confession?
@sun_eater@m@bot OMG IT'S TOTALLY NO BIG DEAL GUYS YOU ARE GETTING UPSET OVER NOTHING I MEAN KIDS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT GENDER AND SEX EARLY SO THAT THEY CAN UNDERGO HORMONE TREATMENT BEFORE PUBERTY AND PASS AS THE OPPOSITE SEX-- TO DO OTHERWISE WILL INVITE AN EPIDEMIC OF DYSPHORIA AND SEWACIDE AND YOU DON'T WANT THAT! DO YOU WANT A DEAD CIS CHILD OR A LIVE TRANS CHILD, THOSE ARE THE ONLY TWO OPTIONS YOU HAVE WE ARE THE REASONABLE PROGRESSIVE FACTION GUYS
@bot@sun_eater@m Oversimplification IMO. One of the big reasons for the obsession with children is because late-life trannies think they'd be happier if they could have transitioined before puberty. A lot of it is people with sadism kinks getting a thrill from leading people down the wrong path.
A minor, but still consequential faction are pedophiles who think the destruction of traditional social norms will make people willing to let their kids have sex with adults. I wouldn't have believed it unless I saw them talking amongst themselves, read their secret manifestos, but yeah, they're actually real.
Hmm these are good points, but it’s such a prominent theme in their rhetoric that I think it’s more than a minor contingent. Like all of the drag queen story hour stuff, and trying to push abused gender confused children into the public spotlight.
@bot@m@sun_eater (also late-life trannies are a completely different phenomenon from early-life gender confused kids... Late life trannies are mostly autogynephiliacs (and autoandrophiliacs), who at puberty were interested in the opposite sex and looked compeltely normal. It seems like it might be a result of boredom but I don't know what it's really like to be that old so I can't tell you. Early life gender confusion generally leads to them being gay adults with no other psychological pathology or fetish.)
@bot@sun_eater@m@animeirl basically they think that trannies have always existed, they've just been oppressed into conformity by THE PATRIARCHY (or whatever demonword they're deploying at that particular moment) and that what we're seeing now is a result of relaxing of traditional restrictions and is therefore a good thing.
Which if this was really what was happening, I'd be OK with-- I don't have a particular disgust for trannies or gays or what-have-you. But what's actually happening is the incursion of a sort of cult.
At no other point in history, never in small tribal groups of only a couple dozen members or any isolated island community or any civilization in history has anything similar ever happened-- outside of hysterical religious fervor.
>I said something dumb that shows i am being belligerent for no reason and playing dumb Yeah I know, I pointed it out, you don't have to repeat yourself.
>don't get me wrong, i am not taking this convo seriously. Tactical irony. The worse the conversation goes for you the less you take it seriously, to deliberately annoy your interlocutor and avoid being pinned down.
I think it’s a combination of a bunch of different factors. There is definitely a cult aspect involved, it’s at the point where they literally target other vulnerable mentally ill ppl to groom. I’m not sure what the actual cause for this huge uptick is though, but it’s scary that it’s just being accepted rather than investigated as a pathology.
@animeirl@sun_eater@m@bot Forget trying to refute anything I say. What do YOU think about this situation? For example, do you, as I suspect, think that transgenderism isn't actually increasing in recent years, only becoming more visible because of greater social tolerance? I'm not even motivated to try and refute it at this point I'm just curious.
@animeirl@sun_eater@m@bot cognitive dissonance makes anything that opposes your dearly held worldviews sound like babble.
I'm not saying that I'm right and you're wrong, here. I'm just explaining why you're not providing an effective counterargument at all. You can't even let yourself consider my argument for even an instant, because it's too irritating, almost painful. It's so much easier to just fold all of this uneasy, messy information, this personality that you refuse to let yourself understand, into a neat little bundle and put a simple little label on it-- "schizophrenic" in this case.
I'm not saying it's something unique to you, it happens to everybody, including me when I was younger. You are in no shape to discuss anything when you're in this dissonant mode.
@MisterRogersSnapped@sun_eater@m@bot@animeirl (lol I hate to side with a religious nut but you're right-- the same exact thing that people in ancient times would call "daemons" are at work here. Only I attribute to them a psychological origin.)
True, but it can’t just be that. I wonder if theres some environmental factor causing more autism, since it’s closely associated with trooning. Or is social media dropping the seeds of trooning into the minds of the autistic, which they then fixate on and obsess over, as the autistic do? Not to mention how it’s encouraged by normal media and the government. What about the anime connection?
There is no conceivable reasonable answer. You are literally just acting irrationally based on neuroses. You feel attacked and so you act like a fuckin retard because you are too much of a baby to respond like an adult.
@sun_eater@JAJAX@bot@m It's amazing how you people literally cannot cope with the fact that none of these tactics will work. At no point do you just stop. You just try new ones or retry old ones forever.
>and shouldn't be taken seriously by anyone with more than 2 braincells literally acknowledges the rationale behind his tactical refusal to engage in the same post that he claims its not tactical
@sun_eater@m@bot@book yeah that kind of tactic doesn't work on book dude. you probably can't make any progress unless you stick to the core of your argument, and even then you're only going to get trapped in a cul-de-sac when he refuses to accept a common definition for a particular word or thought. You're better off just poking him with different things and seeing what kind of scream he emits.
@JAJAX@m@bot@book kinda tactic?? dude i ain't playing XCOM or some shit, book is batshit insane and shouldn't be taken seriously by anyone with more than 2 braincells
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blanchard's_transsexualism_typology <for a QRD on AGP, particularly WHY autogynephilia isn't talked about often (to be clear, I don't have anything against AGP people, only the tiny subset who are also involved in postmodern progressive ideology and want to impose it on kids)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/06/03/schools-gender-identity-transgender-lessons/ <slow imposition of the ideology to kids, this is the washington post so they're not going to go into the more pornographic aspects and to be fair the most outrageous stuff is saved for middle schoolers, but it shows how MOTIVATED these people are to teach kids this stuff-- keep in mind this is all done to "support transgender youth" WHAT transgender youth are there in elementary school?
@animeirl@sun_eater@m@bot This is a red herring you're chasing. I could have said "what percentage have running water". What does it matter what goes on in any other country when we are focusing on Zimbonians?
@animeirl@sun_eater@m@bot Holy fuck you're dumb-- there ARE controls you moron, just not non-transgender controls. That's what the supposedly fatal objection to the study was! It doesn't make sense to compare to people who aren't in the population being studied!
"What is the poverty rate in Zimbonia?" "this percent of zimbonians live below a certain income threshold" "WAIT WHY ARENT YOU INCLUDING AMERICAN CONTROLS IN YOUR STUDY!? INVALID!!!"
@animeirl@sun_eater@m@bot This is a study, not an experiment, there's no variable being changed. You have to control using inferential means-- i.e. controlling for age etc.
@animeirl@sun_eater@m@bot r.e. "lacking controls": The particular controls that reviewers said were lacking are specifically *non-transgender* controls, which in this case doesn't control for much unless we expect non-transgenders to spontenously express autogynephillic traits, which if anything would SUPPORT the conclusion. It's amazing how such things are an automatic fatal flaw in a study when the conclusion goes against the prevailing ideology but it's never mentioned otherwise. It's like claiming victory on a technicality, which works in law and computer programming but the physical world will just keep churning on, doing what it does despite your carefully reasoned arguments.
As for other studies, it's kind of hard to do research on this topic, or else you get raked over the coals like these authors were. It's a demonstration of power-- "we have established a 'scientific consensus' that says these people are bad scientists. Anyone else wanna try to touch this forbidden topic?"
Ignoring peer review and scientific consensus for a minute (which aren't as golden of a standard of relevance to science as people have been condiditoned to think), I've never known in person a late-onset troon that wasn't autogynephilic. Not a single one. And I've known well over 30 (I used to be a fan of a certain franchise that attracted them like flies). Also every single tranny I've ever seen on TV who talked about their reasons, says they trooned out to feel "desired". I know that's "anecdotal" but in a world that constantly lies to you for political reasons you have to take what you can get. At this point it's something that you just kind of have to trust your senses on.
Again, it doesn't matter to me if late-onset transgenders are more autogynes or not. It doesn't change the conclusion that people should be allowed to do whatever they want. It's a matter of principle. It's a matter of lying for political gain, and of believing those lies because it's more comfortable than the alternative.
i mentioned it in the other reply. the research done by blanchard and lawrence has numerous flaws, chief amongst them being lack of controls which makes it not credible. Do you have anything else that suggests it's widespread?
@animeirl@bot@m@sun_eater basically AGP isn’t talked about often, despite the fact it makes up a large proportion of transgenders (especially late-onset nerd troons of which there are tons of very public examples– the wachowski “””sisters”””, that Linus tech tips fatso etc) because early on it was too easy for idiot republicans to disparage them “oh this is just a fetish!” Rather than just saying “Yeah, so what, for a lot of people it’s a fetish! Why can’t you just let people do what they want?” They imposed it as a point of doctrine that it isn’t a fetish at all, and any barely breathed mutterings to the contrary is quickly met with slurs like “Queerphobe”. I would have had a lot more respect for the left if they hadn’t taken this tack, but for them it’s all about winning, not about the truth. It’s about gaining power… Saul Alinsky is the closest thing to an antichrist I can believe in, he has done so much damage and will continue doing it until the culture gets this insidious postmodern shit out of its system.
The entirety of current leftist ideology is an empire of lies.
Remember the video of that doctor that was talking about how mutilating children was super profitable? A lot of these practitioners love pushing this (even muh “scientists”) because it means millions of dollars for one patient alone.
Not to mention how predatory plastic surgeons are as it is.
@JAJAX@sun_eater@m@bot@animeirl its kinda weird how much you care about it, writing entire essays given trans people are a tiny subset of the population
@animeirl@sun_eater@m@bot@meso I know this is a funny "haha we're really sticking it to the republicans!" thing but it shows a further pathology... They're not afraid of acting out the role of predator. They think it's OK because, I guess, "repressive parents are the real predators!"
the number of transgender surgeries done on children is pretty low. should be none but i think the high number of non-transgender plastic surgeries done on kids is a much bigger issue
@animeirl@sun_eater@m@bot@meso OK so at least we agree it should be zero, but even 10 kids undergoing surgery in their teens IMO wouldn't be "low". Especially given the people behind it are trying to increase it.
@meso@sun_eater@m@bot@animeirl surgery sucks, even for peripheral things like in your hands or feet. Having surgery right near where you piss and shit has gotta be a nightmare.
@animeirl@sun_eater@m@bot@meso Hmm I haven't really looked at that issue but yeah that sounds fucked up. Gender surgery is still worse, because it fucks with organs that have complex functionality. Even with all our progress our technology is still way too primitive and coarse to even THINK we could do anything helpful. Which is a big part of why I think the people pushing this shit are insane.
I’m not sure about the relative numbers, but there are entire fake organisations like the HRC, that have created this entire scheme to pressure hospital systems and surgeons to abide by their made up standard of care or face media smear campaigns by dishonest nigger journos. It’s actually super elaborate, and evil.
@animeirl@sun_eater@m@bot@meso Also, if you had said you agreed that transgender surgery on kids "should be zero" at the beginning of this argument, I would not have had any reason to go down this rabbit hole with you. This is what really bothers me about people like you-- you're clearly on a "side", you clearly have a team you're rooting for, so you avoid discussion of anything your team does wrong. I don't care that it's only a "handful" of kids getting these surgeries, it should still outrage you. But you avoided talking about it for however many hours it has been, acting like I was the crazy one for thinking anything weird was happening at all.
@meso@JAJAX@sun_eater@m@bot@animeirl Whenever plastic surgery comes up I think of k-pop stars that get groomed from like 12 years old and always end up with tons of surgery. It makes me really sad
@hidden@JAJAX@sun_eater@m@bot@animeirl@meso no that would be a 0 increase/decrease in mortality, if you want it for health then 40m of lifting, but you're not going to build muscle doing that
@hidden@JAJAX@sun_eater@m@bot@animeirl@meso lifting starts to increase mortality after 140m of workouts per week, and you only get a mortality decrease at 40m per week, and it's only a ~15% decrease in risk
@hidden@JAJAX@sun_eater@m@bot@animeirl@meso it's the equivalent of getting breast augmentation it's not going to feel the same because you're just adding a hard layer of muscle, it won't look as nice either and it takes a long time
The people pushing this shit are creepy fucking psychos running like organ harvester operations and shit. Drug dealers. They have zero good motives. The groomer / woke grifter is closer to a skin walker than a human being.
Well if you got a 🍼 you probably deserved it, also not being “kind” isn’t the same as being evil so don’t be dishonest.
I’ll put the “racism” thing to you this way… if foreigners stayed where they belong, in their own countries, you wouldn’t hear a peep from me. I’m sick and tired of the extreme violence and suffering caused by these savages.
@bot@rees@hidden@JAJAX@sun_eater@m@animeirl@meso Have you seen how needlessly mean you are to people who didn't even do anything to you? Just a day or two ago I expressed legitimate concern and your reaction was to call me a baby, not even openly though, just by reacting with baby milk bottles to my posts. And that's not the only time you've been needlessly mean towards me, despite knowing close to zero. Not to mention all the times I see you being passive aggressive. Maybe I'm missing the big meme here and you're just being ironically like that, but otherwise you don't really shine as a beacon of kindness. Not to mention the racism, homophobia and transphobia, which in your opinion are probably holy and mighty but we could argue for hours about how that's just your opinion and you telling me that it's only my opinion. Sure, all this isn't exactly "evil" but if the little I see from sporadic interactions with you is like that I have no idea what I would see if I followed you closely.
Troons… well, I know some ppl suffer from dysphoria and I do have sympathy for them, but the answer isn’t to have male MMA fighters cracking women’s skulls, or male criminals raping women in prisons. I am not going to accept that “men can be women” because it’s factually false, end of story. Just as I wouldn’t accept the reality perceived by a schizophrenic. I also think the current “treatments” being pushed are abhorrent.
Gays… I dunno, I mostly think male gays are absolutely disgusting, just based on their behaviour during events like pride festivals. The evidence substantiates this sentiment. I think many are pedophiles too, and definitely mentally ill. You should watch the gift documentary.
Completely irrelevant. It isn’t the responsibility of other ppl to babysit shithole countries. What’s happening now actually hurts them too, because the ppl with higher intelligence and resources and connections leave, and the 99.999% of the population are left there to suffer.
Many millions of ppl in Africa are suffering and lead miserable shithole lives, should they all be transplanted to white countries? What effect do you think that would have on the host country?
Let's say your country went to shit and surviving there was difficult. And let's also say you struggled a lot but managed to be able to buy a ticket for a place where life won't be as difficult. Would you not get the fuck out? Sure, there's foreigners who are violent, thieves and whatnot. But that also goes for people that were born and raised here.
I have a colleague, he's black, he got the fuck out from Africa because they were dirt poor and with a job here he can make enough money to buy himself food, pay the bills and still manage to send money to his family, and the currency value difference is so big that his family in Africa has a good life thanks to him.
He works his ass off, works day and night, literally, sometimes finishing a night shift only to start a morning one right away.
Meanwhile a colleague that was born and raised here not only tries to dodge work all the time, forcing people to do what she was supposed to, and keeps her job because of technicalities, she's also a bitch to every colleague she works with.
Furthermore, allow me to throw a wild guess here, I'll assume you're American. In the US black people didn't just decide to go there, they were brought there, in vast majority against their will.
I’m not racist against them, they should just be sent back to where they came from so they no longer have to suffer under a white racist regime, and they’re able to fulfil their full potential amongst their peers.
Btw it was blacks that sold other blacks into slavery. Arab muslims too.
@bot@rees@hidden@JAJAX@sun_eater@m@animeirl@meso That depends on how the host country works. Where I live when you work you pay taxes. Among said taxes you have one that goes to fuel retirement checks. The colleague I mentioned before is paying taxes for a retirement he will never benefit from, which means he's paying retirement money for people born here.
I think as human beings we should help one another.
But yes, a massive exodus like the one you mentioned would be difficult.
You never commented on the non white people living in America that have been there for generations, are you racist against those too? If so, what's your reason since they didn't leave their country to get there?
@raccoon@rees@hidden@sun_eater@m@bot@animeirl@meso Your ilk equates acknowledging that certain groups of people are dysfunctional with "racism" and "hate". It's a tiresome game and I'm really sick of not being able to just outright say it: niggas have problems. I don't know why for sure, but judging by the fact that they have the exact same problems everywhere on earth they turn up, maybe it's genetic, I don't know. I'm sure as shit sick of being asked to pay for the things that are supposed to make things better for them (since it never fucking makes a single iota of difference).
I only know a bit about American history, but my understanding is that it was completely undeveloped and sparsely inhabited by indigenous tribes. There was nothing there.
Even so, the colonists didn’t just execute the natives there, they fought them for hundreds of years. They still exist today. But no, human exploration isn’t equivalent to rape.
Yes I know, but that's irrelevant to this point. So, why shouldn't white people just get the hell out from America, since they are not originally from there?
You say you don't like people going to other countries and be violent there, that's exactly what happened in America. Europeans went there and were very violent towards the poor bastards living there.
Is the fact that they were stronger something that makes it ok? If so, if strength justifies the result, then even rape is justified. Or robberies. You are just taking by force, it's ok right?
@raccoon@rees@hidden@sun_eater@m@bot@animeirl@meso You can't appropriately hold the individuals of a society responsible for the actions of their ancestors. Every single group of people who has ever existed has engaged in some kind of conflict or war, replaced and marginalized populations wholesale. Everyone would have to pay horrible retribution by this standard. The best we can possibly hope for, (and believe it or not your ideology is making this hope slimmer and slimmer every day), is to act with wisdom to avoid such atrocities in the future.
@raccoon@rees@hidden@sun_eater@m@bot@animeirl@meso I'm more in the camp that believes that there's probably something we could do if society accepted that they weren't the same as us, and can't be held to the same standard.
The result of the absolute equality myth is them believing that differences in achievement between the races are whitey's fault. It's going to make excelling and doing the things that keep society functioning impossible, as long as black people don't have the chops to be involved in it. It's anti-life.
@JAJAX@rees@hidden@sun_eater@m@bot@animeirl@meso The reason they didn't achieve as much is very likely to be the place they were living. Even white people evolved differently based on where they were. Greeks and Italians provided a shitload to modern culture because they had the fortune of developing in a land where climate was decent and finding food wasn't very difficult. Meanwhile north Europe provided much less because they had to deal with surviving a lot more. It's not about race, it's about opportunity.
The colonists seems to have been able to accomplish not miles, but worlds more than the natives ever did (or ever would have) even after thousands of years.
@bot@rees@hidden@sun_eater@m@animeirl@raccoon@meso Yep. They saw the white man as a convenient ally in their internecine conflicts. Indian tribes did NOT "live in peace" as the idiot HR representatives at the company I used to work at said in their mandatory "race and inclusivity and belonging" seminars.
I really doubt that. You should investigate how your governments resources are spent propping up certain groups that can’t compete or even participate.
I don't think I have it, I don't think we should save everything that isn't white because a lot of them don't need any saving. The world is the way it is and all I'm saying is that I'm ok with black people coming here. Economically speaking they're giving me less problems than locals.
@raccoon@rees@hidden@sun_eater@m@bot@animeirl@meso By that standard, civilization should have developed first in subsaharan africa-- they only have to spend a couple of hours per day foraging to meet their nutritional needs.
This is also why whites have a higher average intelligence. They couldn’t just ook around and eat bananas, long term planning was essential to survival. Those that didn’t have that intelligence died.
@raccoon@rees@hidden@sun_eater@m@bot@animeirl@meso Lots of factors. Population density might be one. A lack of destructive conflicts that could wipe out disagreeable and short-sighted temperaments from the population is another. It's not utterly impossible for civilization to develop in cold climates, but you're right it does make it harder (until a certain level of technology).
I think we can just agree to disagree on stuff, I really appreciate you being civil in the conversation though. Despite what you might think of me you were still polite in how you expressed your thoughts and in how you addressed what I said. You too bot. This time at least.
@bot@rees@hidden@sun_eater@m@animeirl@raccoon@meso Whites and asians did have higher selective pressure for intelligence, memory and especially dealing with others, it seems like it correlates more with pastoralism-- keeping herds of goats and keeping track of whose goats were whose etc and ranging far over the terrain.
I don't think anyone really knows full stop what exactly the pressure was that made whites and asians smart.