>what is business at that level The fiduciary responsibility to shareholders. And if your shareholders are larry fink and his friends, and they decide there will be a direct disincentive for you not doing something ("if you don't implement these 'ESG' policies, we're pulling out and we'll encourage others to do the same") for not doing something, you're up the creek without a paddle.
It's the stonetoss comic: >kamala supporter: "HE'S GONNA TURN THE COUNTRY INTO A DICTATORSHIP!!!" >he had four years to and didn't >trump supporter: "IT'S GONNA BE A DICTATORSHIP!!!" >she had 4 years to do that
What do you think the jews would ask for in return for a complete reversal of their domestic US policy? Realistically, you cannot deal with these people. If I theoretically had the upper hand, there would *be* no deal. I'm not giving them any amount of rope to hang me with. You give them an inch and they'll try to rape a mile out of you.
I get the whole "play with the cards you're dealt" thing, but SBB was proposing this in an abstract hypothetical not bound by the constraints of reality.
Transgenderism, broadly, is a symptom rather than a cause. You want to cure cancer by treating the symptoms instead of biting the bullet and going for chemo because it takes to long or whatever.
Jews are overwhelmingly behind the tranny surgery stuff and even the trans phenomena in general though. If you got rid of the jews, you're getting rid of like, 100 birds with one stone instead of just cutting off one head of the hydra. What you're proposing here is a short term solution with immediate results with limited scope vs. A longer term solution that, while might take longer for 2nd/3rd order consequences to trickle down, has a much broader scope.