Notices by Owl!🦉 (lonelyowl@lor.sh)

@BeAware

> Though I'm also clueless as to how it relates to the post

It's unrelated, but you post a lot about neurodiversity and i picked a random post to ask a question about the subject in general.

> I feel those that talk a lot aren't usually those with ASPD

They may talk a lot to entertain themselves (and also lie a lot in the process for no reason). ASPD isn't that kind of disorder that make you withdrawn and unsociable, it's commonly referenced as sociopathy and its most notable drawback is the lack of empathy and the feeling that people around you are retarded subhumans

@BeAware

I wonder if ASPD folks counts as neurodivergent 🤔

@BeAware

> However, I would not be able to be brainwashed into supporting someone that was charged with rape. That goes against every fiber of my being.

I understand, it's pretty bad. I dislike this overly radical reaction, but okay.

@BeAware

> I can't find an excuse that's good enough for that.

I once asked my mom if she would still love me if i finally went full crazy and killed a shit ton of people in a mass shooting. She said she would, even though killing people for no reason is pretty bad.

...
I dig a bit about this whole "rapist support" situation. I didn't find any mention of her vigilantly supporting that person, i only found that she attended their trial, and then said she shouldn't have

https://variety.com/2024/music/news/linkin-emily-armstrong-criticism-danny-masterson-1236135990/

...
Sometimes i think that human society itself is a huge church of scientology, a destructive cult that at best makes people sad, at worst makes them kill themselves 😖

@BeAware

Poor lady.

Everyone dislikes her for poor vocal performance, now it turns out that she is a victim of scientology brainwashing and is also hated for that. I hope she doesn't follow in chester's footsteps

#memes

#aiart #aimages

@pixelworld_ai @BeAware

This is terrible. What if i just don't like my legal name? I am prefer to be refereed as "Owl", everyone knows me as Owl.

@BeAware

Don't forget to also mention that their posts are public, and they should keep that in mind before posting anything, otherwise bad things could happen 🧐

@BeAware

Well, scraping someone's follower-only posts is indeed a dubious thing. From one perspective, it is worth mentioning that "follower-only" posts are in fact not protected, they are broadcasted to everyone anyway, and could be made public by a pleroma mrf policy (like the one annihilation.social is using).
From other perspective it is a rather bad behavior. Anyway, stop assuming your posts here to be "protected", it is dumb and, honestly, dangerous.

You still can block people and instances if you don't like them for whatever reason, though.

@BeAware

No problem, dude, i'm an anti-copyright extremist anyway, you can assume all my stuff is public domain 🙂

@BeAware

Then "normal users" have a twisted understanding of the word "public". You make a post, don't put any restrictions on it, you don't encrypt it, it is visible to EVERYONE, but you don't expect it to be scraped for by a stranger, for some reason. This kind of brainrot is responsible for a fact that we don't have a normal bsky bridge...

@BeAware @akurilov

These posts are public, everything is public here, anyone could use this data for any purpose.

Usually when people talk about privacy violation, it is about selling personal data, like legal name, email, home address, private encrypted messages, etc. Stuff that is highly sensitive and pretty much wasn't intended to be known by anyone except a certain party.
If you don't want to make your posts available for everyone, there is a simple solution - stop using public social networks 🧐

@shanie @BeAware

Many such cases. A lot of """privacy""" features of various fedi software are dubious.

@BeAware

I wish i was that good at cybercrimes 😭

@mookie

I thought that linkedin isn't a social network at all but rather a workforce catalogue 🤔

> The point of a social network is being social and having interaction with others, not broadcasting for the sake of broadcasting.

I also disagree with this. Sometimes you actually create a social network account for the purpose of broadcasting something, like posting pictures you've drawn, not for social interactions. I remember a friend of mine complaining that the artists he followed on xitter used to post a lot of personal and political stuff, which was annoying because he only followed them to see pictures.

@BeAware @simplycorbett 🤔

@BeAware @simplycorbett

There is no "algorithm", if you follow a person, you will see all of their posts in your feed. If you follow too many people, your feed will look like a rapid conveyor belt of random stuff, which is not convenient.
Therefore, at least for me, it makes sense to try to only follow folks who you find genuinely interesting to interact with. You may notice that i often reply to your posts or reposts, this is because i follow not that many people and your posts don't get lost in my feed 🙂

@BeAware @pixelworld_ai

"Any kind of thing that was successfully used against me must be used by me against my enemies" 🧐 🧐 🧐

@BeAware @pixelworld_ai

Well people still can defed you.
This is why i prefer to be a decentralized entity on multiple instances 🧐
I'm unblockable 🧐 🧐