Вот думаю, есть ли смысл стремиться к бытию Senior+ (но тут жить на работе надо). Зато вилка 470к+ (верх не знаю). Сеньорскую пока тоже можно осваивать, но её года на полтора роста хватит, если не наглеть, а я чуток понаглею. Вообще с ценами как-то склонен выбирать такой вариант, с которым соглашаются не торгуясь, ибо торговаться не люблю.

Это изумительно

https://abelomorov.livejournal.com/1542.html

@akhil anyway ~/.local/flatpak/app/<app_id> would be more conventional I think

@drq but why not:
-/.config
~/.local/flatpak

@tedu @lanodan @hj well, why I expected it to be sarcasm. Writing nice software is one of the most complex industry problem. It is one of the reason why there is a lot of tech universities, books etc, that's why people argue in stackoverflow comments etc and still there is no silver bullet. Maybe I was triggered by the word "guidance" which I interpreted as giving enough instructions (holy shit, corporate life kills my brains).

The word "nice" applied to software is subjective - nice to who? Author? Third party developers? Operating system(s)? PC's memory or cpu? End users? Novice or advanced? Every answer creates limitations which prevent software being nice for part of the users. Leaving the answers unanswered often prevents software from being nice for everyone.

Op's idea of "just writing nice software on his own" is one of the ways to give answer to the most of such questions - author is the only user so he know everything about users. And it is a good way. I love DIY-software, there's lot of fun, but I think of it as of ugly bullshit, but still love it :D

To make it NICE I need to invest about 200 hours into learning modern front-end (and even after learning it I will still think of it as of ugly bloated shit).

@tedu @lanodan @hj agahahhahhahhahahhahahhahhahhahahhahhahahahhahahhsha :blobcatgooglycry:

@hj @lanodan @tedu if you aren't serious and it is sarcasm, it's best joke of the month, really, made my day, etc

@lain @syphist time to PIRATE THE HAIRCUTS

@iron_bug @mastohost aren't fediverse servers should have a protection against such behavior? Like limit of the peers got from server in a single attempt (random 10) and skip attempts to get more if every domain in attempt can't be resolved and mark the original host as malicious/semi-dead?

@iron_bug @mastohost btw being marked as a malicious if 10 random domain in a peer list are nxdomain is a great motivation to keep peer list clean for everyone in fediverse :D

@iron_bug @mastohost yep, 10 is abstract, yet good enough for sampling and checking, instead of fetching all of peers at once and it's _good_ exactly for servers with thousands of peers. And you're absolutely right - peers lists aren't updated instantly and that's why even fetching by 10 peers at time will work fine.

@Rezard а что при коммунизме происходит с теми, кто свободно решил не работать?:blobcatthinkOwO: