Notices by Jim (nou@poa.st), page 6
-
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 05:02:32 JST 
Jim
@Balrog @Godcast @GrungeQueef @RealRaul @Eiswald Holy crap Chaim...have you suffered some kind of head injury? Do you need an ambulance?
What is "vague" about pointing out you are lying in your claim that Social Security has been gutted? -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 05:02:31 JST
Jim
@Balrog @Godcast @GrungeQueef @RealRaul @Eiswald So I was wondering why you sound like a cartoon caricature of an antisemite, and as always, my gut instinct was right.
The Eternal Drama Nigger... SAD!
Tell you what. If I ever want an expert opinion on Ethan Ralph's penis, I'll consider what you have to say. Otherwise, you have exactly zero of value to add.
Note: I will never want an expert opinion on Ethan Ralph's penis. -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 04:24:56 JST
Jim
@SuperLutheran I'm not a determinist of any sort.
But pretending biology doesn't lead to certain inclinations or predispositions is just schizophrenic.
And extremely ironic from someone who was not too long ago trying to tell me one of the messages of 1 Corinthians was "self-control is hard." -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 04:24:55 JST
Jim
@SuperLutheran Obviously a bad example since Our Lady was born free from the stain of Original Sin.
But if you want to pick any other female saint, then absolutely. And overcoming the worst parts of their nature is precisely why they get that cool little "St." in front of their name. -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 04:24:54 JST
Jim
@SuperLutheran >then that isn't from original sin, that's from design
That's not (necessarily) true in the slightest. That only holds if you think that the spiritual doesn't affect the physical. Which would be a really bizarre take for a believer to have.
I'll also take this opportunity to point out "to be whores" is your wording, not mine. I don't think that women trading on resources for their sexuality (or men doing the reverse) is inherently bad. It's kind of one of the main purposes of marriage in a non-Clown World. -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 04:24:53 JST
Jim
@SuperLutheran So which part of that are you denying applies to marriage?
Husbands aren't supposed to financially take care of their wives? Or wives aren't supposed to pay the marital debt? -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 04:24:52 JST
Jim
@Victor_Emmanuel @SuperLutheran >A transaction can be ended at anytime by either party for any reason
Also, this is entirely false. Preventing that is literally the exact reason contracts (of which marriage is one) exist. -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 04:24:52 JST
Jim
@SuperLutheran I don't disagree with any of that, except your assertion that what you described isn't transactional. It absolutely is.
It may not be a 1:1 quid pro quo, but it is indisputably a transaction. And one can test this by looking at any relationship where a man stops paying or a woman stops putting out. The other side dries up. And usually incredibly quickly. -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 04:24:51 JST
Jim
@Victor_Emmanuel @SuperLutheran >I have a transactional relationship with my boss “I work for you and you give me money”. I could quit or he could fire me
You may. Try not showing up to work when you have a contract. Or firing someone in a Right to Work state. Are those employer relationships somehow not transactional?
>I did not have a transactional relationship with my parents “I obey you and you take care of me”. I could not quit being their son and they could not kick me out (without being terrible parents).
Only insofar as as the blood relationship goes.
Insofar as the actual filial/paternal responsibility goes... it's absolutely transactional? I don't know what definition of transaction you and Super are using, but relationships where both sides have obligations predicated on the otherside fulfilling their obligations meets the definition in the dictionary... -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 04:24:50 JST
Jim
@Victor_Emmanuel @SuperLutheran >They are less so. An even lesser version would be slavery.
Ok.. this is just simply not the normal definition of transaction. So it sounds like we're just using different definitions of the word and don't particularly disagree.
>If a transaction was merely an agreement then there would be nothing distinguishing it from a covenant
Sure there would. A covenant is merely an agreement. A transaction require each side provide something, a covenant can be transactional, or it can require something from only one side. Or from neither. An armistice would be an example of the latter. -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 04:24:49 JST
Jim
@Victor_Emmanuel @SuperLutheran Super was accusing me of saying all women are whores for pointing out that female reproductive strategy is basically trading in on their sexuality for resources.
My point was that acknowledging that in no way suggests I'm saying all women are whores. And in a non-Clown World that impulse is good, and healthy. -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 04:24:48 JST
Jim
@SuperLutheran @Victor_Emmanuel Once again, you are dishonestly taking a generalized statement and trying to naxalt it. Naxalt is dishonest and crappy when liberals do it with race or sodomy or any of their other pet issues, and it's dishonest and crappy here. You framing a generalized statement broadcast into the ether as a personal attack on your family is frankly pretty gross.
And your pretending not to grasp that prostitution is a perversion of natural relationships but that it maintains the same form is amazingly even more dishonest. Pic very much related. -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 04:24:47 JST
Jim
@SuperLutheran @Victor_Emmanuel And?
Are you honestly denying that matters of degree can be the difference between something being godly and sinful?
I know for a fact that you don't believe that because I have seen you post on the difference between drinking alcohol and intoxication. I would assume you are attracted to your wife, but certainly hope you're not engaging in lust. Same with eating but not engaging in gluttony. Pretending that is one issue where nuance and degree goes out the window is insanely dishonest. -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 04:24:46 JST
Jim
@SuperLutheran @Victor_Emmanuel No. For at least the third time, I don't think a woman selecting a mate for his money or a man selecting a mate for her sexual attractiveness is prostitution.
In the same way I don't think eating is gluttony. Or that sexual attraction is lust. -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 03:16:06 JST
Jim
@AndkonsReich @BowsacNoodle @Nesano >What are you talking about. It does refute your point because it's an example that Jews infact have subverted multiple societies over a period of thousands of years
Niggers have torn down and pillaged any society they've been introduced to. Doesn't suggest conspiracy, much less continuous conspiracy across multiple millenia. -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Jul-2023 00:30:39 JST
Jim
@StoleMyThundersBalls @caekislove @IAMAL_PHARIUS Oh, nice. I get to post this again!
youtu.be/abP_zo7QTF0 -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Jul-2023 22:43:08 JST
Jim
Friendly reminder, you're never more than an ATM to her. -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Jul-2023 22:43:07 JST
Jim
@SuperLutheran >I'm NOT just an ATM to my wife
I never said you were.
I would also never describe the US as a giant Welfare Store for the entire third world.
But in both cases the point is about what these things are *viewed as*, not what they are. -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Jul-2023 22:43:06 JST
Jim
@SuperLutheran Obviously I don't know your wife personally. And I'm not going to pretend to be an expert on what she thinks.
But on a subconscious level, chances are... yeah. Maybe you're right, and she is one of the top percent of a percent who is completely able to overcome her biological hardwiring. And I pray you have found the Thomas Sowell of the XX gang.
But assuming you have, speaking in generalities based off a single outlier is... not a great way of interacting with the world. -
Embed this notice
Jim (nou@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Jul-2023 22:43:05 JST
Jim
@SuperLutheran It's next to the dumb and violent gene in blacks.
Lmao. Are we really doing find the gene? Are you dusting off your fedora and going to start arguing biology doesn't real on YouTube? I think you missed that bandwagon by a few years man.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the