Notices by Gabriel Pettier (tshirtman@mas.to)

@evan i answered 6 or more, but now i wonder about the definition, ending the story the normal way without shortcuts, or doing all the possible side quests or even finding all the secrets? because the latter i'm not sure even once.

@patrickcmiller the title is misleading, it's a 3rd party app *for* gnome, but it's not made *by* gnome.

Many people here would have great concern if such a feature was integrated by default.

@xale @sop right click on the gif, -> show video controls (at least in firefox).

@luis_in_brief probably the former 🥲

@luis_in_brief this is art.

@bmacDonald94 Il me semble bien qu'on a des portraits de lui, pas besoin d'utiliser l'IA pour en générer un.

For those in the comments who hate Robespierre, maybe go a little beyond what you were taught about him and this difficult period, he's not the terror, the terror was a moment he was in, and he was certainly not one pushing for it, there were much more radicals than him. Wonder why you were taught to hate him, as you learn more.

@cwebber try "pain of chocolatine" if you want to be yeeted twice as hard.

@inthehands Well, i’m glad i only took 1 TSLS share, and that you said it was not a sensible investment 😆 I’ll keep holding to see how it goes, but since that by order, it’s down about 40% 😬

@kims uh, psyolcybin? is that legal over there?

@kims i saw someone use it yesterday and thinking it was about correc this time, was a strange feeling.

@inthehands seems to be registered by andy meadows, who also has bl.ink another link shortener
https://www.whois.com/whois/1-gop.us

@mgorny someone probably has a project that they don’t want to migrate to a new test system, but want to use on more recent versions of python.

Software is never truly dead.

Hence we need to be careful when creating it, especially if we put it out there, if it gets even a small user base, it could have consequences for decades.

@luis_in_brief that's a really tight supply chain…

@slamr @HauntedOwlbear i found their products in a place near me, not cheap (cheese is not cheap in the first place, but you do pay more for less here), but i tried the camembert and the blue cheese and was blown away by the latter, the camembert is not bad at all, but the blue cheese is next level, really creamy and tasty. Really worth the price imho. Thanks for sharing about them!

@hongminhee there is a tsvector datatype for that https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/textsearch-intro.html the "best" way certainly depends on your constraint, but i would evaluate that first and see if it doesn't match your need, look for solutions more specific to it.

@GossiTheDog ok, this is bad, really, but on the other hand, how are antivax conspiracy theorists going to process that information?

@tokyo_0 @cazabon yes, the "and" will ensure the result of "in" is used if needed. the code is similar to:

if not Ecryption.AES:
. . . flag = False
else:
. . . flag = "FLAG" in stream

but i commonly need to check/rethink if "not" affects the whole "and" expression 😅.

regarding compile/run time, python does most things on the latter, and doesn't optimise this kind of expressions, because the language gives you too much freedom to be able to check they are valid.

@tokyo_0 @cazabon In python, values are generally "truthy" except for:
- False
- None
- 0
- "" (empty string)
- [] (empty list)
- () (empty tuple)
- {} (empty dictionary)
- set() (empty set)

which are "falsy".

Here your test probably assumes the value is True or False, but it could be something else, like either a string containing a key, or None, or a custom object or None.

@dgar didn't vote, because i didn't listen to the full playlist yet and i don't remember where i stopped 😬 .

Busy today, but will try to give it another go.

@tokyo_0 @cazabon "and" and "or" will short-circuit if the first part is enough to know the result.

>>> def spy(value):
... print("called with", value)
... return value
...
>>> spy(True) or spy(False)
called with True
True
>>> spy(True) and spy(False)
called with True
called with False
False
>>> spy(False) and spy(True)
called with False
False

so "in" will only be called if the value before the and is "truthy", which means that bool(value) returns True.