Pentagon ran secret anti-vax campaign on social media
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-covid-propaganda/
Pentagon ran secret anti-vax campaign on social media
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-covid-propaganda/
@GossiTheDog title is click-baity; it wasn't anti-vax as such, it was discrediting a specific Chinese vaccine
@GossiTheDog ok, this is bad, really, but on the other hand, how are antivax conspiracy theorists going to process that information?
I noticed that the article mentioned researchers at Stanford who also identified some of the psyop accounts. And lo and behold, the embedded link lead to a report by the Stanford Internet Observatory, which Stanford is sadly closing. I know it’s a small side note but it worries me that we are losing such an effective research team amidst what can only become more (both state and non-state sponsored) internet propaganda.
@GossiTheDog the US Empire has a long history of using healthcare and health workers to infiltrate and cause direct harm to targeted communities.
They pretended to vaccinate for flu in Pakistan, and instead of doing that they instead just stole genetic info to supposedly track bin Laden, despite that not being at all how genetic tracking works.
You can't tell if somebody is near by based on the genetic information of a person you know is in an area.
Not to mention Tuskegee, Puerto Rico, etc.
@mousefriend You can tell if bin Laden is there if you get bin Laden's DNA. I thought that's what they did. Or possibly find a concentration of Arabic people.
The plan was actually to try to find his descendants from living there a few years?
@GossiTheDog Oh, this can only go full-bad. Next people will be asking "If they did this, then who else did they do it to?" Next we'll be finding they did such to vaccine producers who were not US controlled.
@GossiTheDog What could possibly go wrong?
It only strengthened the nutjobs. 😠
@GossiTheDog So basically, anti-vax is a Pentagon's conspiracy to make people believe in a different conspiracy..?
@GossiTheDog There will be some conflicted tin-hatters out there right now.
@GossiTheDog “ ‘ I’m extremely dismayed, disappointed and disillusioned to hear that the U.S. government would do that,’ said Lucey, a former military physician who assisted in the response to the 2001 anthrax attacks.”
When I read this , I remember people in the military are often just like people under a guru’s influence in a sect. “Oh no, he would never do that. Sure, the purification room has a gallon of lube but it’s for soul cleaning purpose. The Illuminated understand.”
jfc. there are no safe places anymore.
"The U.S. military’s anti-vax effort began in the spring of 2020 and expanded beyond Southeast Asia before it was terminated in mid-2021, Reuters determined....
"The military program started under former President Donald Trump and continued months into Joe Biden’s presidency..."
@GossiTheDog This is the problem with power. They had a slap fight that got billions of people caught in the middle.
We now have 2 narratives factually debunked:
* Campaign was discrediting the only available vaccine thus leaving populace defenseless
* Campaign against single vaccine severely affected fatality rate in Philippines
US mil made a mistake for sure (the existence of the article itself proves that), but
the data speaks for itself.
I have finally read the article and can say that the headline is absolutely misleading to the point of being absolutely correct. They ran an op to indeed discredit a "vax", but not the broad idea of vaccination -- rather, a specific vaccine coming from a specific country (well, 2 in total to be precise).
Reuters journalist[s] goes to great lengths in mental gymnastics to connect different narratives [to sensationalize the article] by covering his ass with a scientific research that presumably demonstrates that skepticism towards a single vaccine spills over to broad uncertainty about the whole vax idea.
The stanza "Chinese vaccines ... less effective than the ..." is mind bending on its own as the actual numbers are 60% inactivated vs ~97% mRNA. Why is writer using word "less" instead of "CATASTROPHICALLY LOWER"? Would've fitted article tone very well.
Having said that, you really shouldn't pour shit on other vac producers while holding up [or not able to] supply of your own vac.
@cek No, that's not how this works. There is no surgical precision psy-op. You run a nonfactual campaign against a specific vaccine, you undermine the people's understanding that vaccines work. You run an anti-vaxx campaign in the Philippines, it leaks into the global zeitgeist and definitely contributes to vaccine paranoia on the other side of the planet.
The Pentagon is a threat to global health.
Sinovac was 60% effective and mRNA vaccines were 97% effective. That's a fact. The campaign said China is the virus, don't take Sinovac, when Sinovac was the only vaccine available in the region. That's murder.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.