Notices by Schizo McFuckface (Previously Maijčika) (faggotracist1488@mrhands.horse), page 10
-
Embed this notice
Schizo McFuckface (Previously Maijčika) (faggotracist1488@mrhands.horse)'s status on Friday, 16-Aug-2024 11:22:03 JST Schizo McFuckface (Previously Maijčika)
@Tony @Alex_Fog @BowsacNoodle @ForbiddenDreamer @TimeSpent @Hoss you're not fixing a bpd bitch on your own
but they're not so bad if you send their ass to the proper therapy (most never do this on their own) -
Embed this notice
Schizo McFuckface (Previously Maijčika) (faggotracist1488@mrhands.horse)'s status on Thursday, 15-Aug-2024 02:14:05 JST Schizo McFuckface (Previously Maijčika)
@sun @feld @threat @newt its honestly partially an architectural issue in that regard. telegram has the e2ee and regular chats as seperate, whilst in xmpp they are necessary one and the same with the encryption overlaid and can be mixed freely. the XMPP clients dont do it that great but such sharp a division wouldn't really be too easy or accurate to what your actually doing. i feel like it could be better but the red messages or noticable red locks if somebody sends unencrypted messages when you were encrypted are a pretty reasonable way of doing this. personally i would prefer if there were better controls for the the end to end encryption. there's the obvious issues with like dead users and groupchats and shit, but i mean, if issues do come up and things dont go through or cant send at the very least you could give an actual button to reset the encryption there, change up the private keys, all that good shit, new ratchet. but there's really no way to interact directly on most clients and generally it merely boils down to whether you trust or not a billion different fucking keys a shitty client generates -
Embed this notice
Schizo McFuckface (Previously Maijčika) (faggotracist1488@mrhands.horse)'s status on Thursday, 15-Aug-2024 02:04:49 JST Schizo McFuckface (Previously Maijčika)
@sun @threat @newt to be fair the telegram e2ee has some sketchy shit in it aswell, but for the day to day user who is not targetted i'm sure its fine. but i wouldn't put the most trust after they straight up inserted an obvious backdoor and then removed after everybody pointed it out -
Embed this notice
Schizo McFuckface (Previously Maijčika) (faggotracist1488@mrhands.horse)'s status on Thursday, 15-Aug-2024 01:49:24 JST Schizo McFuckface (Previously Maijčika)
@newt @threat @sun I would generally agree, while he brings up good points he seems to make the biggest deal out of very little for the sole matter of not doing things exactly how signal does it. matrix is a pretty easy target everybody knows its had shit security in forever, but his xmpp article definitely was a pretty blatant case of bias. like he even referenced the signal docs agreeing at a point but stated its still bad because it wasn't justified well enough, and he made a mistake in the article but refused to correct it only leaving a note blaming writing quality. these types of trumped up non issues are fucking insufferable.
i haven't read the latest matrix article yet but i am sure this will have no affect on my opinion of him, mostly smart, but insufferable and a shill. both in personality any in focus.
to quote the article of this devout signal evangelist,
> But in return, I really don’t appreciate unsolicited evangelism towards any technology.