On the contrary. Nagatoro clearly establishes, at least among her friends, that she feels special about him and will protect him. Nagatoro teases. She's the type of obvious "bully" guys would like.
Takagi is a sociopath who inflicts harm and then non-nonchalantly dismisses involvement. Just pure evil there.
@lapin And the plural of "ox" is "oxen". The plural of "focus" is "foci", the plural of "calf" is "calves", the plural of "sheep" is "sheep", the plural of "person" is "people", the plural of "die" is "dice", the plural of "datum" is "data", the plural of "attorney general" is "attorneys general", &c.
>But your average consumer should not be assumed to have sophistication or
If you are selling openly and not just to trained specialists, you are forced to assume that the buyer is a total moral and take extraordinary measures to prove that you've made yourself clear to the point that even a sub 90 IQ idjit couldn't fuck things up.
>Limits in Medical Devices are somewhat understandable given the risk of litigation.
Oh, it's not just litigation, it's actions by the regulators themselves. If you do something stupid and take two approved medical devices and sell them together as a packaged set, multiple regulators from many major countries you sell in will come upon you and make you feel lucky to only get fiscally cuddled within an inch of your countries existence. The civil trial is bad enough, but the criminal penalties for not dotting the "i"'s and crossing the "t"'s is far, far worse.
>similar issue as for medical equipment and aviation. ham fisted red tape created with (mostly, at least I hope) the best of intentions
Medical devices aren't as nearly as bad as automobiles or airplanes, but you still need hundreds and thousands of dollars for even the simplest medical device. The main driver of cost is actually the EU's new regulations that a lot of companies, especially and ironically European countries, are having a hard time meeting.
A lot of new regulations involve trying to prove safety and efficacy with electronics in fields such as medical devices where the regulations were completely nonexistent even a decade ago. The perpetual need of the regulatory state to reinvent itself to justify its own bloat leaves a lot of companies that had originally complied suddenly way out of compliance because they didn't notice every single regulatory change which likely wasn't even widely publicized.
>yup. the obscenity laws. ridiculous imo. it is what it is
Those are actually not the same thing. In the case of the former, it is illegal because it is furthering a crime outside of the question of speech. In the case of the later, it is a strict 3-pronged test and rarely enforced outside of public showings/readings/&c.
For the most part, it is not the speech being barred, but what it is being used as a tool for. As an analogy, swinging a hammer is legal, but swinging that hammer into a person's skull isn't.