Notices by brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st), page 5
-
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 22-Aug-2024 02:50:40 JST brigrammer @dubbub @BattleDwarfGimli @TrevorGoodchild @Hertz @PraxisOfEvil @sickburnbro Something happened in the 1970s? -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 22-Aug-2024 02:50:31 JST brigrammer @dubbub @EvilSandmich @TrevorGoodchild @Hertz @BattleDwarfGimli @PraxisOfEvil @sickburnbro a gold base currency isn't a reserve currency, the reserve would be gold
look at the deflationary nightmare of Japan where everything gets "cheaper" and salaries keep falling and falling for an example of what insufficient inflation looks like -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 21-Aug-2024 23:22:41 JST brigrammer @BattleDwarfGimli @Hertz @PraxisOfEvil @TrevorGoodchild @dubbub @sickburnbro > It is usurious rates - 8-30% interest - that I have issue with.
The rate is a combination of the market and the risk. If I can get 4% putting money in a savings account, I will ask more to lend it out - if the savings account paid 8%, I would adjust upwards my ask because of the alternatives to giving out a loan.
As to why the rates are X or Y, that is something not even economist agree on.
And for those loans that are riskier, say on a card which rapidly loses value versus a home that does not, or a unsecured loan or credit card with no collateral, the rate reflects the risk.
People should not be taking on debt unless they have a very good reason to. That people do anyways reflects either they are not wise people or they have been put into bad situations. The latter should be fixed, the former cannot. -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 21-Aug-2024 23:14:04 JST brigrammer @BattleDwarfGimli @TrevorGoodchild @Hertz @PraxisOfEvil @sickburnbro The only alternative to compound interest is either much steeper fixed interest or some sort of interest with extra steps.
Present money is always worth more than future money, plus the risk of default and other costs.
Debt is a powerful tool to do things now too expensive to afford by deferring the costs into the future - the problem is people who have no ability to make long term decisions being given such a dangerous tool. Most business and home ownership would be impossible without it.
There is no free lunch when it comes to finance short of a nationalized banking scheme in a high trust ethnostate, which would require a whole lot of expulsion and executions to achieve. -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 21-Aug-2024 23:14:03 JST brigrammer @dubbub @BattleDwarfGimli @TrevorGoodchild @Hertz @PraxisOfEvil @sickburnbro I could get a mortgage and have a house now, which I pay the cost of over many years, or no house now but no interest. You may think the latter is more moral somehow, but it means renting which is paying for not having a house. You might contend families could loan, or a good state could give loans, or...but that is not going to be the case.
Loans are a mechanism for moving money through time (see infographic I made). The problems of usury are in people making poor decisions, not in the ability to pay a premium for future funds. If the interest does not compound, the fixed cost must higher and the duration of the loan lower to net to zero.
If I give a man a loan, I expect payment in excess of my principal - otherwise I would simply rent that the money was sought for. Anyone who thinks money works otherwise probably doesn't have much money or is consumed in debt. -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Aug-2024 00:11:27 JST brigrammer @mk @pyrate @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired > you like the whites.
so, are you a nigger, a brown, or a kike? either way, you need to get into the oven -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Aug-2024 00:06:32 JST brigrammer @mk @pyrate @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired you are the one who keeps talking about feelings, are you a woman because you are as emotional as one -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Aug-2024 00:05:17 JST brigrammer @mk @pyrate @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired my positions are that only White men of good moral character, and their White families of good moral character, have the right to firearms and should be organized into armed and trained community militias to kill any and all invaders and criminals, as the founder intended
I do not accept the modern reinterpretation of America as a multiracial areligious hellscape. I do not believe in tolerance or allowing dissent by the depraved. I believe the wicked and debased and foreign have no rights. -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 12-Aug-2024 23:51:16 JST brigrammer @mk @pyrate @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired you want niggers in the country, want to arm communists, hate authoritarianism, are a lolbert
yet you now accuse me of being leftist - this is why lolberts must be shot alongside the communists they enable
you are mentally ill and a degenerate -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 12-Aug-2024 23:43:12 JST brigrammer @mk @pyrate @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired > go fuck a nigger, faggot.
what a strange thing to say
> you present yourself as a right-winger
my pfp is a nazi holding a fanta, that you think that is left wing is your own libertarian mental illness at work -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 12-Aug-2024 23:39:27 JST brigrammer @mk @pyrate @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired > and you also acknowledge that you kinda like 2A? right?
I support having guns, but not because of any conception of "rights". I reject the globalist nation-state and the multi-ethnic hell I live in.
Only Whites of good moral character should have guns, and should be required to train and act as a militia as the founders intended. All others should leave White lands, restoring America to its founding stock. Jews are not White and must leave. -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 12-Aug-2024 23:32:21 JST brigrammer @mk @pyrate @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired I live in a simple friend enemy distinction, and will feel no pity for anyone who chooses to be an enemy
my logic is as simple as it is absolute -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 12-Aug-2024 23:29:21 JST brigrammer @mk @pyrate @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired the original example was the nazis killing commies and taking guns away from commies and you being offended at this despite the people whose "rights" were being "trampled" were communists
the only right a communist has is to die - anyone who argues otherwise is supporting communism and is thus a communist and thus deserves to die -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 12-Aug-2024 23:27:35 JST brigrammer @mk @pyrate @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired because you demand the right tie its hands behind its back and lose to the left so you can feel like you have done some moral thing that only makes sense in your weird framework
and since that makes the left win, that makes you on the side of the left -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 12-Aug-2024 23:25:37 JST brigrammer @mk @pyrate @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired no, that anyone defending leftists is a leftist -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 12-Aug-2024 23:22:07 JST brigrammer @mk @pyrate @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired I am saying you are a leftist and should be shot -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 12-Aug-2024 23:16:43 JST brigrammer @mk @pyrate @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired > they aren't allowed to have weapons..
> how about free speech? no?
what part of I don't believe they have a right to be alive makes you think I believe they have some other rights?
> you might as well kill them, right?
yes. that is my opinion of the left -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 12-Aug-2024 23:13:07 JST brigrammer @mk @pyrate @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired my enemies are not my country men, they have no rights and my only duty to them is to end the sin of their existence -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 12-Aug-2024 23:05:04 JST brigrammer @mk @pyrate @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired you define your notions of good by the procedural and do not give a damn what misery you inflict by them, I define the good by what effect is done to society
your condemnation is praise in my ears, for your creed is communism with extra steps -
Embed this notice
brigrammer (brigrammer@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 12-Aug-2024 22:44:30 JST brigrammer @mk @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired > how is it a more open gunlaw, when you restrict access to guns based on political views?
This will always be the strangest view to me. Only a small (<2%) faction of people have a libertarian view procedural freedom as the highest moral foundation.
These people demand the people who want them dead and enslaved be armed and given opportunity to take over because defeating leftists would be "unfair".
The lolberts will fume at being accused of being socialists, but aggressively demand that socialist be allowed to kill people and take over the state.
I think they should be shot alongside the commies.