@OliSPunkt@afelia Ich habe nur eine, bin jetzt aber unsicher. Ist sie genderneutral ("das WC") oder weiblich ("die Toilette")? Männer gehen leider leer aus.
@HistoPol@jamie@chronohart@luca@PCOWandre@activitypubblueskybridge@fedidevs@fediversenews@snarfed@shiri Maybe that there is still something to do for the development. For example, if Mary answers to a couple of users (and usually you see all their fediverse names in the head of the message), Babsi sees a copy of this message with only the @ names of the Bluesky users and those Fediverse users who have agreed to the Bridge, but without those who have not.
@HistoPol@jamie@chronohart@luca@PCOWandre@activitypubblueskybridge@fedidevs@fediversenews@snarfed@shiri Proposal 1: Yes, but the "like", "share" and "answer" buttons are hidden or disabled for Babsi; furthermore Freddie's fediverse address ("@freddiemiller@friendica.xyz") is hidden so that it is not easy for Babsi to mention him. Perhaps it is even possible to prevent textwise selection and copying. But even if copy & paste would be possible, as @HistoPol mentioned, no trail would be left. ->
@HistoPol@jamie@chronohart@luca@PCOWandre@activitypubblueskybridge@fedidevs@fediversenews@snarfed@shiri Of course, you are right regarding the issue of boosting content. So I would like to intervene a little bit earlier. If, e.g., Babsi on Bluesky follows Mary on Mastodon, Mary already has given her consent to interact with BS via the Bridge. But now Freddie, another fediverse user who has NOT given this consent, answers to Mary's post. Question: Can Babsi read Freddie's comments? ->
@jamie@chronohart@luca@PCOWandre@activitypubblueskybridge@fedidevs@fediversenews Okay, this is the other side. On the other hand, one can admit that we discuss about a bridge to bluesky, but if, anywhere in the world, a server would join the fediverse spreading hatred, bad thoughts and dangerous algorithms, nobody would discuss. Anyway. Before the new bridge service starts, I would strongly recommend to deal with European data protection laws for they are stronger in the EU than elsewhere.
@jamie I would disagree. First, only a few people would use the bridge. But then the new connection would spread out like a seed - slowly, but spread. Then the number of bridge users will grow exponentially. That means, an opt-in (or at least no pure opt-out) would be a good option. @chronohart@luca@PCOWandre@activitypubblueskybridge@fedidevs@fediversenews