@evan
There might as well be fedi servers owned by billionaire investors..
Notices by snaeqe (snaeqe@chaos.social)
-
Embed this notice
snaeqe (snaeqe@chaos.social)'s status on Thursday, 09-Jan-2025 08:11:17 JST snaeqe -
Embed this notice
snaeqe (snaeqe@chaos.social)'s status on Wednesday, 06-Mar-2024 15:13:59 JST snaeqe @clacke
@TempestDerg @lispi314 @JesI have yet to see a DP port on a source that will not drive an HDMI port on a sink.
OTOH, HDMI on the source with a DP sink requires DP, erm, Double Plugs on the source, those cables need power, as provided by the Universal Strom Bus. -
Embed this notice
snaeqe (snaeqe@chaos.social)'s status on Sunday, 28-Jan-2024 19:36:54 JST snaeqe -
Embed this notice
snaeqe (snaeqe@chaos.social)'s status on Sunday, 26-Nov-2023 01:23:02 JST snaeqe *looks into any random datacenter*
Today, these things are computers, and we stack other things, also being computers, on top of them. -
Embed this notice
snaeqe (snaeqe@chaos.social)'s status on Friday, 27-Oct-2023 16:26:53 JST snaeqe @emilygorcenski
We're not talking about malfeasance like corrupt employees. You can only strive to have audit logging for any access privacy-related.
But if your law framework literally says "This is how we will have you hand over data without any let alone proper oversight", you cannot make the same assertions that you can do if you have a law framework with pretty detailed outlines for permissible causes and how oversight is performed. -
Embed this notice
snaeqe (snaeqe@chaos.social)'s status on Thursday, 26-Oct-2023 21:04:05 JST snaeqe @emilygorcenski
🇺🇸 companies can't even come near proving they don't honour NSL for 🇪🇺 customer data that are unlawful here. Because they have to.
There's no such instrument (to that degree of secrecy and disrespect for privacy and individual, especially non-🇺🇸 rights) as NSL in 🇪🇺, which can be proven by looking at law texts. -
Embed this notice
snaeqe (snaeqe@chaos.social)'s status on Thursday, 26-Oct-2023 04:00:59 JST snaeqe Causa Snowden has pretty well established that this (ie requiring negative proof) is the absolutely only possible way.