@teleclimber @bentsai Any minimalist launcher helps with this (I use KISS launcher)

@protonprivacy I have one question: at what cost? Human rights, gay rights, women's rights, trans rights, immigrant rights, and so much more.

The GOP *is* the party of billionaires (look at donors, Project 2025, etc). The fact that a stopped clock might give the right time is mostly irrelevant if that same clock pushes for all other clocks to stop as well (I know, bad analogy, but work with me here).

That doesn't mean I like Dems - they're feckless *b/c* they are rolling over to Trump.

1/?

@polarity @zeyus Ardour *feels* professional and polished. That didn't come from nowhere. And you might say "Well, companies should donate money and resources", but that now gives them outsize influence over the project, which can often be a bad thing.

So yeah, I'm totally fine with people paying for builds of FLOSS software if the alternative is that the software doesn't have the resources it needs to take on proprietary software.

@polarity @zeyus It's easy to sit on the sidelines and throw stones, saying shit like Ardour isn't really "free", but...it preserves the four fundamental freedoms of free software while charging a nominal fee if people don't want to compile it themselves. I *appreciate* when software is monetarily free, but that's also not sustainable in the long-term if we want to build a suite of FLOSS tools that are competitive with proprietary options.

@polarity @zeyus I mean, they need money to actually develop shit. Because I get it for free through my distro, I setup a monthly donation to them.

Yeah, software costs money to develop, and maintain. Some go the unethical route by making it proprietary. Ardour has made their DAW open source and Linux users get it for free b/c distros put in the work to compile it (I donate to Debian as well).

The West has shown that colonialism and genocide are tolerated when they are perpetrated by someone considered part of "the West" (US, UK, and now Israel). It sucks because we *need* to stand up for human rights. *All* human rights.

@w3c The problem is that it is voluntary. It means that companies are free to ignore standards that they don't like :/

@Miro_Collas @palestine This is probably true *and* it does not absolve Israel of war crimes. This is probably true *and* it is being weaponized by pro-Israeli countries like the US to kill the case against Netenyahu.

I don't want to minimize assault and rape allegations just because it is being cynically exploited to kill another investigation.

Don't like fascism? Stop supporting companies that like it. It's not sufficient, but it's necessary.

Don't buy from Amazon. Don't buy from Whole Foods. Don't buy from Walmart. Close your Facebook/Instagram accounts (keep Messenger and WhatsApp if necessary - you can create a new Messenger-only account if needed). Close your Twitter account.

Boycotts work when they are widespread. This *is* doable, but it takes organizing.

Mission accomplished: 197/197! 🎉

https://www.sporcle.com/games/g/worldflags

Y'all, take the money you have been giving to corporate outlets and redirect it to nonprofit newsrooms. The mainstream media is failing us (and has for a long time), and this is a good opportunity to redirect your money:

https://newsmatch.inn.org/

Yes, voting won't fix everything. Yes, we will still have to struggle for a better world against *whoever* wins this election. But if there's one thing I know, it's that letting outright fascists who praise Hitler and use rhetoric straight out of Nazi Germany win is a terrible idea. It's not going to make it easier to organize for a better world and, in fact, will make it *significantly* harder.

The first people Hitler threw in jail were commies and socialists.

No, Trump won't be better on Gaza. He will *increase* aid to Israel (he has said as much). He will remove whatever few guardrails kind of exist right now on our aid to them ("Let them finish the job"). He has been itching for war with Iran since his first term (the only reason it didn't happen the first time around is because the generals refused).

As if the literal fascist will stop a genocide of people he hates.

FFS, what are we doing here people?

1/?

And, taken holistically with all of the *other* issues (abortion, worker's rights, LGBTQ+ rights, birth control, and so many other things), it is absolutely unconscionable to let Trump and the GOP anywhere *near* the reins of federal power again. And yeah, it's not just Trump - it's the entire GOP.

Are Dems perfect on this? No, absolutely not. But only one candidate is even *pretending* to care about the working class.

5/?

And you're telling me the *literal fascist* who aches for generals like the ones Hitler had (he even gets that wrong - his generals pushed back sometimes LOL) and who hates Muslims...is more likely to end the genocide than someone who recognizes Palestinian suffering?

Again, what are we doing here people? This is madness.

I understand if someone votes for e.g. Stein or Claudia De La Cruz or someone. I don't understand voting for Trump based on Gaza. At all.

4/?

His 'peace' rhetoric is a *lie*. He has *repeatedly* demonized Palestinians, using it as an insult. He has repeatedly called for Israel to be allowed to 'finish the job'. What, in any of this, makes *anyone* think that he will stop the genocide in Gaza?

Meanwhile, you have Harris at least *mentioning* Palestinian suffering (a ridiculously low bar, but *she's the only one who clears it*).

3/?

Trump is not, nor has he ever been, isolationist. From dropping the MOAB on Afghanistan to increasing drone strikes by 432% to assassinating a top Iranian general to countless other war crimes, it is absolutely clear he is a war hawk. It's just that he couches allowing Russia to get what they want as 'a peace deal'. Hell, when he talks about peace in the ME, you think he means a two-state solution or one multi-ethnic state? No, he means kill all the Palestinians.

2/?

There *is* a meaningful choice in this election. The Dem party *has* moved in a more populist direction (the Overton window has moved from whether we should guarantee healthcare as a right to *how* to do it, for example). Full-throated support of unions (followed up by policies like the PRO act and a more muscular NLRB) is routine. Biden's FTC chair is going after tech monopolies. This shit is *good*.

8/?

And then if we compare VP candidates, the choice is even starker. Tim Walz has a *genuinely* progressive record. Vance, on the other hand, is a lying grifting shapeshifting asshole who backs up all of Trump's racist misogynistic lies along with pushing his own shit about childless women and the fucking great replacement theory.

Again, what are we doing here people? Vance should never *ever* get anywhere close to the reins of power, period. And Trump isn't exactly young.

7/?

Only one candidate has a plan to tackle price gouging. Only one candidate has pledged to restore Roe v Wade (yes, Dems were complacent and yes, that sucks...doesn't mean we punish them for finally waking up!). Only one candidate has pledged to tackle housing affordability.

The other candidate who could plausibly win is going on anti-trans tirades, lying about POC immigrants eating pets, wants tax cuts for the wealthy, wants to cut the social safety net, etc.

6/?