The question isn't just if Le Pen manages to gain a mandate to power.
But it is how one should govern a country, where 1/3 vote for racists and fascists.
And this question equally applies to Germany, Netherlands, US...
Notices by mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)
-
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Monday, 01-Jul-2024 17:05:22 JST mxk
-
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Monday, 01-Jul-2024 17:05:21 JST mxk
@patrislav sadly I don't see this happening, as long as it brings views.
-
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Thursday, 20-Jun-2024 17:59:13 JST mxk
@GossiTheDog wait, MS Paint of all things got AI Integration?
What is next, AI in Notepad? -
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Saturday, 04-May-2024 07:50:55 JST mxk
@pid_eins you could eliminate half of my use cases to use VMs over Containers, if systemd-nspawn would offer a container aware interface for creating loopback-mounts.
-
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Friday, 26-Apr-2024 21:17:58 JST mxk
"hi I am Greg, this is wrong, everything I say is public information and *not* under NDA" - @gregkh on stage of the #GoogleAndroidBootcamp
-
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Sunday, 10-Mar-2024 05:39:36 JST mxk
@thomasfuchs more likely the opposite. Boeing got to this place due to the merging of incompatible company structures. Throw a third one in the mix and you are going to kill Boeing for good.
-
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Monday, 26-Feb-2024 17:42:44 JST mxk
@Buerzl @mamsell Klassiker.
Und die Wortwahl "Teigtascherl" hilft aber auch echt nicht, dass ich den Artikel leichter ernst nehmen könnte -
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Monday, 26-Feb-2024 17:40:57 JST mxk
@mamsell was genau war illegal? Hat sie keine Steuern gezahlt, hat sie behauptet es wären Soufflés und war es darum Betrug?
Ich habe so viele Fragen. -
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Thursday, 08-Feb-2024 22:31:53 JST mxk
@thomasfuchs @brouhaha Modern BSDs depending on how you draw the line starting with Net/2 or with 4.4BSD-Lite Release 2 are legally and logically separate from their original Unix history and should be considered reimplementations.
Also, those are just drivers and subsystems that are borrowed from and not the Kernel. XNU/Mach never were part of the main Unix family.
And using drivers and the network stack from BSD is in no way unique to MacOS, QNX and Windows NT did the same. -
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Thursday, 08-Feb-2024 22:14:48 JST mxk
@brouhaha @thomasfuchs this. It is certified Unix compatible and it at different points incorporated code from NetBSD and FreeBSD, but XNU/Darwin Trace no direct history to the AT&T Unix/System V, so calling it a "true" Unix is misleading.
And in a world where the true Unixes all are dead, the value of this certification is really questionable. I would argue, that POSIX nowadays is what counts, and certified UNIX is purely a gimmick. -
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Friday, 26-Jan-2024 23:48:31 JST mxk
There is a technology for everyone, where progress goes too far for ones person willingness to adept.
For my grandfather it was programming the VCR.
Have you reached that point already? If so, what technology was it? -
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Sunday, 24-Dec-2023 18:03:28 JST mxk
@tokyo_0 @daihard @downey so, on my home instance, the big official instances frequently get limited, due to spam attacks.
But those big instances also host a huge amount of legitimate users myself and others here *want* to see.
No, the current behavior really is, what I would want to happen. If the insurance is really considered malicious as a whole, then turning it to limited is not the intended tool.
I get that maybe a suspension, as a tool between limited and blocked could be useful. -
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Sunday, 24-Dec-2023 17:42:57 JST mxk
@tokyo_0 @daihard @downey yes, what you are thinking of, is putting everyone from this instance in the limited state.
And IMHO this is exactly the right thing in this case. If there are 1000 new spam accounts, everyone on your instance probably will never see them. But the interactions with existing accounts, your users are following, can continue as they did before.
Setting whole instances to limited as such works as a workaround, while the mods are asleep. -
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Sunday, 24-Dec-2023 17:25:53 JST mxk
@tokyo_0 @daihard @downey No, it explicitly was never intended as suspended.
Limited means, the reach of this account gets limited to those, who explicitly want to see the account.
They can no longer annoy others with reply spam/follow spam/hashtag spam. Who still *wants* to see this account, can do so, using following.
Preventing boosts would rather be an action regarding their followers, which seems strange in this context. -
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Tuesday, 21-Nov-2023 15:13:29 JST mxk
@thomasfuchs can we also talk about the fact, that it does not seem plausibel, that they even have the data to make this claim?
I can't imagine that twitter logs the whole timeline with ordering it shows to users... -
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Sunday, 19-Nov-2023 20:58:36 JST mxk
@thomasfuchs are there other gui-toolkits left, than chrome?
-
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Sunday, 05-Nov-2023 01:34:59 JST mxk
@thomasfuchs agree, not a fan of agile.
-
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Sunday, 29-Oct-2023 16:35:10 JST mxk
@henryk noch ein Datenpunkt, ja, da hat definitiv jemand an dem Algorithmus gespielt.
https://x.com/DichJasmin/status/1717440276128505869?s=20 -
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Sunday, 29-Oct-2023 16:34:51 JST mxk
@henryk okay, du gewinnst. Ich dachte schon meine heutige Empfehlung wäre seltsam gewesen.
-
Embed this notice
mxk (mxk@hachyderm.io)'s status on Thursday, 26-Oct-2023 00:38:15 JST mxk
@ErikUden you are not talking about direct memory access here, are you?