what really sucks about the way that so many leftists handle interpersonal relationships is that it's *so* obvious when someone is interested less in helping people than chasing the addictive emotional high of righteous anger.
when your politics are built primarily around the latter rather than the former, then you tend to navigate the world by constantly seeking that high. and because anger against people you can't touch is most often directionless - the equivalent of pissing into the wind - they start to look for targets in their immediate vicinity.
and when your primary motivation for leftist praxis is that sort of righteous anger, you naturally want to maximize that anger through rhetorical flourishes, mental gymnastics, and malicious readings of everything that your target says. that's how we get the absurd flattening in leftist "accountability" spaces, wherein someone saying something unintentionally bigoted, recognizing that they're wrong and owning up to it receives the same response as though that person were a serial abuser or virulent bigot. or, for example, the trend of assuming the maximum amount of harm done until proven otherwise because you don't want to place the burden of coming forward on those actually harmed (if anyone).
lateral violence harms so many people in our communities. and until we normalize politics based around grace, solidarity, and helping others, rather than manufactured righteous outrage, I only see the problem getting worse as things around us get worse.