Delta Chat and Thunderbird both seem more afraid of accidentally sending an unreadable encrypted message than accidentally sending an unencrypted message. I kinda would want the opposite philosophy ideally.
Reading Ingo's text, it seems to me that it might be better using mdoc to convert to DocBook since going from strict&semantic to flexible&loose is usually easier than the other way around.
Yes, this is positive. What I want specifically is this:
My AP posts to also show up over there on AT
(This should be opt-in because a lot of other people do not want to be proxied, but I’d wanna give it a try at least.)
People can post replies to my AP posts from there and I can reply back and forth in a convo
I can block individuals who behave badly or turn off the whole bridge if it’s too many
This is similar to how I am on OFTC normally but Matrix people can reach me at the bridge on @_oftc_sandra:matrix.org and those comments show up over on my OFTC account and I don’t even have to notice they’re on Matrix.
I’m not in a hurry to start following people who are on AT 🤷🏻♀️ even though that might be fun down the line.
I’m scared AT will be way more toxic and twitterlike since they deliberately are designing for an algo-driven world/global timeline which is the opposite of the bubble-coziness we have here on Fedi.
It’s not written for the day job. It’s not written to see the light of day at all. It’s not written to be looked at and scrutinized by anybody. It’s intimate and personal, it’s messy and buggy. To take a look is to transgress.
That is absolutely how I feel. But I’ve gotten better at releasing libraries, tools (like 7off), plugins that can be more polished part of the system. It’s just that the glue code of things with all its hardcoded URLs and hacky tags is… uh…
Most people outside of the hacker community think that other people’s privacy is only creepy.
I was listening to the news the other day and the reporter was indignantly yelling at a postal delivery company for not opening more packages to check for drugs. Even though that would be illegal to do.
However, these bans are technically not doable without a complete lockdown on all computers ever made. Like a super gooped down Android or iOS with no sideloading. Goodbye general purpose computerGgpc, hello spyware appliance.
There are plenty of good reasons beyond privacy to not wanna attempt such a horrific lockdown.
Yeah, duh. I literally wrote as much in that link you're refusing to read 🤦🏻♀️
"It’s ridiculous to impose artificial scarcity where there is no need for scarcity. The Earth is a multifaceted thing and there are areas where there are scarcity, which we need to carefully manage (or systematically manage), and there are areas where there isn’t scarcity and it’s evil to create and impose it."
Not into someone jumping into my threads to re-explain FOSS basics in tedious detail as if it was 1983.
We need new ways to put food on the table beyond the traditional GNU floppy disk yard sale model. That's not gonna go very far. And I'm not eager to join up some pyramid scheme lottery where we all buy floppies or LiberaPay subscriptions from each other hoping to eke out dinner and a place to sleep.
UBI, crowdfunding, there's a bunch of ways. Or we can radically reimagine the way humans distribute tasks and resources by thinking way out of the box. Again, see https://idiomdrottning.org/mittens
As far as I can tell, authors could make money by selling physical books of texts and access to digital copies
I’m not very happy with that setup. Not only are book sales top-heavy as that post shows, the entire idea of limiting access to digital copies goes against the pay-it-forward cornucopia of mittens and socks: https://idiomdrottning.org/mittens
Idiomdrottning demonstrates a new and often cleaner way to solve most systems problems. The system as a whole is likely to feel tantalizingly familiar to culture users but at the same time quite foreign.