Which brings up the larger point that this right-wing claim is analogous to the one from the Degrowth movement that there is no infinite growth on a finite planet.
While the Right continues with the contention that because there cannot be endless growth in welfare spending we'd have to cut it in order for economies to thrive, the Degrowth movement claims that because there cannot be infinite growth we'd need to cut resources consumption in order for the environment to sustain.
Both arguments are structually similiar, reactionary, and ignore the option of decoupling of social welfare costs from resources as of economic growth from resources.
(See https://theguardian.com/environment/2025/dec/11/economic-growth-no-longer-linked-to-carbon-emissions-in-most-of-the-world-study-finds that nudged that thought.)