@jeffcliff @DeezMistaReez @BowsacNoodle @Ovpod "the vaccine PREVENTS more myocarditis and blood clotting than it causes.
heart.bmj.com/content/110/9/635";

I was going to stay out of this. Congrats. You got be back in. I don't suppose you've done a click on the BMJ Group's About Us page. Or, maybe you have and you're aligned with the sky is falling climate emergency crowd. Either way, this organization has a far Left leaning agenda and I wouldn't trust any research sanctioned, funded, promoted or produced by them. Remember 99% of scientists agree with the opinion of those funding them.

It is hard to find people these days who aren't aware of the COVID-19 "vaccination" myocarditis pericarditis connection. Even the completely compromised CDC has had to publish the connection. Considering the CDC's initial position on the vaxes was that they're completely safe and almost 100% effective at preventing transmission or contraction of COVID-19, this is a surprising admission to me.

cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/vaccines/covid-19.html#cdc_generic_section_6-a-closer-look-at-the-safety-data

We've all been waiting for decades for a vaccine to cure the common cold. The flu vaccine 20% to 30% effective after decades of use. Enter COVID-19. Within 9 months 4 different companies have a vax based on a new, untested mRNA tech. LOFL. Nothing to be suspicious of there. They initially tell us, "Almost 100% effective at preventing contraction and transmission" but within 6 months they've gradually reduced that to 40% effective. Ah, but we have a booster we can sell you to solve that problem. LOL. Again, nothing to be suspicious of here. And the Pfizer clinical data? You don't need to see that for...70 years. Fortunately, a judge prevented Pfizer from hiding the data. And, what did we find in their clinical results? 9 full pages of contraindications in what we were told was a perfectly safe, "experimental vaccine" that, by the way, the manufacturer's could not be held liable for people who suffered contraindications from their product. The best part? They don't have to prove efficacy and they couldn't if they even wanted to. "All of these people would have dies if they hadn't taken our experimental drug." "Well, how do you know that?" "We just know." Got it.

Candidly, I have to hand it to big pharma on this one. They pulled of the most successful financial scam in corporate history. They're scum, but you have to admire their ability to execute on a grandiose plan.