Embed Notice

@joeinwynnewood

This is a flat out lie. Of the more than 120 million votes cast in the 2016 election, 107,000 votes in three states effectively decided the election.

You told me it was a lie, and then provided evidence of why I was correct. You’re doing it wrong :)

So assuming you were part of that 107,000 that means if you voted one way the same person would have won with a 107,000 margin, if you voted the other way they would have won with a 106,999 margin. The outcome would have been exactly the same no matter how you voted if you were part of that 107K group. No matter how small the group is, as long as it is greater than 1 you changing your vote will not effect the vote of anyone else int he group, therefore the outcome is unchanged by your vote.

It was less than 1/2 that in 2020.

You would have to find a case where it was 1/107000 that number to show even a single counter-example to my claim, so again, still proving me right.

The same is true for dozens of Congressional races, hundreds of state office races and many thousands of local races across the country.

We are talking presidential election here. But sure, ill bite, even if we included congressional races you’d still have to show such a race coming down to a single vote, which you cant. Even if you could the odds of being that one person who decides a vote the one time in all of history it is likely to happen on a major election is still so astronomically high it is effectively 0 even if it did happen once somewhere.

@gfjacobs @Burnt_Veggies @CoachMark @WrenArcher @kamalaharrisforpresidentnews