So you're making a lot of assumptions here. Drake Bell was abused and often victims of abuse go on to become abusers themselves. But in the Drake Bell situation, I'm pretty he actually addressed it himself.

Why would the PF guy get the same treatment? You're making a lot of assumptions and starting with a lot of presuppositions. Have you made an analysis of the court record in the case? If not, I wouldn't speculate about him being innocent when you don't know. He could have had disgusting images on his phone of very young kids. If he really is guilty, you could be defending a predator based on only your skepticism, not on evidence to the contrary which we have for example with the Whitmer case.