@RadixVerum @BattleDwarfGimli @CrustalRidge7 @bobbala @jb @matty No I am just going by situations like I mentioned above that make me suspicious. See Drake Bell:

usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2021/09/17/drake-bell-explains-child-endangerment-conviction-false-claims/8376692002/

>In June, the "Drake and Josh" actor was charged with disseminating harmful matter to juveniles and attempted child endangerment. In court, the victim, now 19, said Bell exchanged explicit photos online and engaged in sexual conduct with her on several occasions, including at a 2017 concert venue in Cleveland and at a hotel.

>In the video, Bell acknowledged his interactions were "reckless and irresponsible," but he claimed he was "unaware" of her age and only communicated with her via text messages — without any physical contact.

Drake Bell also knows about the rampant child abuse in Hollywood and spoke of it on "All Quiet on the Set," so it seems like this situation was exacerbated to ruin his credibility.

So the alternative hypothesis I have concerning the PF guy is he got involved with a girl who he was unaware was underage and foolishly sent her dick picks. She then sent him pictures of herself which is what the government is categorizing as "child abuse material".