Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
So what I'm seeing here is.........
- ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: likes this.
-
Embed this notice
They're only interested in family unification when illegal aliens are involved.
-
Embed this notice
My first thought also.
-
Embed this notice
The hospital doesn't get to keep the baby as collateral like a title loan place.
Nah, this looks like CPS took the baby away from the mother right after he was born, and so the parents took the baby back and ran.
CPS loves to take White babies because they can sell them. Nobody will buy the black or brown ones.
-
Embed this notice
Let me guess, the baby was in CPS custody
-
Embed this notice
Perhaps they took the baby from the hospital without paying the bill?
-
Embed this notice
I just find it kind of telling that it's not illegal to have a child at home and no hospitalization is required by law, but if you deliver on a hospital, you can't just walk out with the baby. Why? It can't be about child safety or we would have outlawed home birth, plus the result is not any different. In both cases someone had a baby and it is at home at some point in time. It can only be about billing.
-
Embed this notice
It's easy to legally involve law enforcement. You call them and say "Something happened." They show up and get involved.
It pays to at least know your rights whenever you are going to interact with any sort of authority. I'm not a lawyer, but I've dealt with cops and had to hire lawyers to navigate the system, and picked up a few things that you'll also see on Youtube. It can be hard to actually do the things if you don't have a lawyer who is YOUR lawyer telling you not to, because we get trained from an early age to be susceptible to the very manipulations they use.
One thing to know about CPS involvement is that they are generally not "officers" and can't simply take your child away from you in a lot of instances, but they'll act official and say "I'm going to take your child," and people will say "oh, okay" and let them, instead of saying, "Get off my property."
You'll notice in that picture it says the parents were "detained." That simply means that the police took them into temporary custody (not arrest) while figuring out if a crime had been committed. Since it doesn't say "arrested," it sounds like the cops took them into investigative custody long enough to decide that a crime had NOT been committed and let them go.
I would like to know if they maintained custody of their child after that happened or if the government thugs took the baby again.
-
Embed this notice
Another thing to pay close attention to is "Hospital policy" is not "law." There may be laws that you and the hospital both need to follow regarding how and when a patient under care is allowed to leave, but the hospital can't just make up their own "law" and have it enforced by the government. They can make policy and then say, "this is how we do things here," and you can say, "I'm not going to do that."
-
Embed this notice
Interesting, though I am more interested in whether or not any of that could actually legally justify law enforcement involvement.
-
Embed this notice
And they will do what they can to bring in the money. In one instance the goal was definitely to get extra money for room time. They claimed they didn't have a doctor on staff at to discharge. I was like.... wtf do you mean you don't have a doctor on staff? You're a hospital. Who's care are my wife and child under at this moment should something happen?
-
Embed this notice
In that case, they charged us for 3 days worth of rooms when we were there less than 24 hours.
> 1 day delivery room
> 1 day post delivery room
> 1 day recovery room
> Total: $10k
I offered them $5k. They said "no." I never paid, and they never did shit about it.
-
Embed this notice
Is there actually any legal basis for any of this or is this just a new form of tyranny? Actually asking considering how much Talmudic nonsense our laws have become.
-
Embed this notice
It happened to my wife and I two out of three deliveries. They threatened to call cps. In one instance when I went lawyer, they isolated my wife to ask her if I was abusive. She told them to fuck off. (I'm nice af to my wife btw).
I then went lawyer about their tactics and got my child and wife discharged immediately. I'm just glad my wife is savvy enough to play the game. I acquired discharge in the other case as well.
Nonetheless, this is common. I feel bad for laymen who don't know how to bait the doctors into fucking up, so you can make them sweat. Doctors are deathly afraid of malpractice, losing their licenses, etc as covid showed.
-
Embed this notice
This is a direct attack on the sovereignty of the family unit and I want the heads of all those who would attack it on pikes.
-
Embed this notice
> You have a right to determine the course of your child's medical treatment unless the hospital, who is not a court, orders otherwise.
-
Embed this notice
@tyler @MCMLXVIIOTG @Verfassungsschmutz @tiddlywinkler hospitals get no benefit of the doubt anymore. Until proven otherwise, it's some faggots on a power trip. I'm willing to believe the parents have the best interest of the child and the hospitals only care that you do what they say, and money.
-
Embed this notice
So the child is with his father and mother - yet it's an abduction? From whom, the state? I have to stop here, or I will get too angry from what the hospital did to my wife and I with our youngest.
-
Embed this notice
In california, lawyers are only required to report if they believe there is risk of immediate bodily harm, e.g. murder.
Anything less that is illegal requires "quiet" recusal.
Where a motion is required recusal is basically "I have a legal reason" without more.
-
Embed this notice
There's no doctor-patient privilege. Subpoening that information is work-a-day for many firms in all sorts of cases.
Your insurer gets the entire file too.
-
Embed this notice
And any little government / insurance / pharma "rat on your patients" thing.
The medical profession is a total disaster.
-
Embed this notice
And if a lawyer leaks things his client told him in confidence, he's disbarred for it.
For doctors it's the normal course of business.
-
Embed this notice
Doctors and lawyers approach matter completely differently.
The lawyer can think his clients an idiot, but the job is to find every rule and argument and tactic that facilitates the client's goal. The client chooses what he wants, the lawyer is a means.
A doctor chooses the ends and the means. He thinks you're an idiot and he knows best. So yeah... he's just an administrator, and you're not human. You're just a chart and tests.
-
Embed this notice
@Humpleupagus @MCMLXVIIOTG @Verfassungsschmutz @tiddlywinkler @tyler @EnnaComa @WhitestTemplar so it's literally just bureaucrats on a power trip eh? fucking typical
-
Embed this notice
@Humpleupagus @MCMLXVIIOTG @Verfassungsschmutz @tiddlywinkler @tyler @EnnaComa @WhitestTemplar what pretense would they even have to do this kind of thing? like what treatment are they demanding that you don't want? vaccines I'm guessing are a part of it
-
Embed this notice
It doesn't matter. They'd just say that without discharge, the child wasn't cleared to leave. That's why I pushed in both cases.... "what's the medical reason the child can't be discharged." They usually say "were waiting to see...." in which case you ask "see what? Name a specific condition which requires current hospitalization or is likely to result in a life threatening emergency requiring immediate care in the next few hours (and in the first case... if it's so important, why isn't anyone on staff to provide care in such an emergency).
Like I said, in most cases they're trying to increase billing and can't give real justifications.
In the end you say, so you can't give me any medical justification for refusing discharge, so you must discharge. If you don't, there are remedies and you're not going to like them.
Tyler
Peter
tiddlywinkler
Verfassungsschmutz :sonnenrad:
?? Humpleupagus ??
WhitestTemplar
EnnaComa
cjd
bajax
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the