@BroDrillard From what I have seen, many, if not most, on the "right" have bought into every "tar the movement" psy-op bait introduced to smear the truth - from 9/11 to the Pandemic. There are many people out there who believe that the planes on 9/11 were "holograms," and that either "viruses don't exist" or the "Covid virus never existed." As a result, when you try to tell relatively-sane mid-wit normies about how 9/11 and the Plandemic/Vaxx conspiracies were run by the Rulers - using open-sourced facts - they think you are one of "those crazy people," and return to eating their MSM-Gruel - simply because the latter seems "less crazy."
The same "lesser of evils" perception is why Biden had to literally "open the borders" - to make Trump's weak / pro-Shamnesty immigration policies seem "far less bad" - never mind the policies we voted for in 2016. Similarly, pushing "trans" (as Trump did openly through 2021) was to make "regular faggotry" seem "not as bad." And, somehow, "continuing all the wars" was compared to "didn't start any NEW wars in his 1st Term," vs ending the wars (what we voted for).
One would think a child could see through this, but ...
@reallyangry@BroDrillard@BowsacNoodle software freedom isn't just about source code being visible - it's about having control over the software in your life both as an individual and at the level of your community/society
@reallyangry@jeffcliff@BroDrillard@BowsacNoodle Not sure if it is just my spergy brain, but I can't wrap my head around that. Even if I was talking to a chatbot as my main form of entertainment I'd always have in mind its limitations and the reality of what it is.
Asking LLMs specific questions only carries the risk of them hallucinating and giving a BS answer.
Talking to LLMs as chatbots with no specific goal can result in both sides of the conversation free associating themselves into la la land. But you really have to lack self-awareness (typical shitlib) to think that you're some prophet because a machine told you so.
On a second thought I wonder if this is some sort of vulnerability of their mental sw/hw that exist in some people. Like how pot can bring schizophrenia out in some people who would be ok without that input. Also reminds me of "BLIT" by David Langford. (good story, highly recommended)
I agree @entropyrider with one minor quibble: I'm not sure transfection can induce mutations in the patient's genome...more likely it disrupts gene expression, cellular regulation and communication.
I'm not sure if a test exists that can detect the presence of transfected "spike protein" (or antibodies specific to it) distinct from all the other proteins that are in the background, whether or not the person was transfected.
If the "virus" they detected via PCR made up part of a pre-existing background signal, then the "vaccine" induced mutations were more likely the result disruptions to the patient genome caused by transfection.
@Zardoz@BroDrillard Covid was constantly mutating from the "original strain." But Moderna's 2016-patented "gain of function" spike protein** did not change much, because it was very effective - so natural-selection preserved it, until the "vaccines" targeting it were released.
A good study showing this effect was a locked-down Vietnamese hospital, with gene-sequencing equipment on-hand, which documented how the variants among the newly-vaccinated hospital staff differed from the variants circulating in the general population. This also revealed the then-new vaxx did not "stop the spread."
I don’t know about the rest of the things you listed, but there was no Covid-19 virus. An RNA molecule does not have the replication fidelity to travel the world in the way described by the screens. Believe what you like.
@entropyrider@Zardoz@BroDrillard To be clear, I am not talking about the "PCR Tests" - where they cranked-up the amplification-rates to insane-levels, to create mostly false-positives, because "positive tests" were rewarded with govt-money - the method used to create the "case-demic" out of healthy people - then, "asymptomatic spread" coming out of that to justify lockdowns, masking non-sick people, etc.
In the case of the study to which I referred, above: If you have a long sequence associated with "sick" people - as in, they have actual symptoms - a sequence which is unique to this outbreak (does not match sequences mapped in the large database of previous diseases) - then, one can map when changes occur in that sequence = "variants."
Which takes us back to the apparent stupidity of making the "vaccine" only target one part of the virus, vs how the immune system will target mutliple aspects. The more ways the body can recognize the virus, the more mutations it must make to not be detected by a previously-infected person.
In this context, until Omicron**, everyone who had SARS had natural-immunity to every variant of "covid," due to common features recognized by the immune system, which did *not* include the "novel" (Moderna's patented) spike-protein.
** Some believe there is no logical mutation pathway to Omicron, and noting that it was much less likely to cause severe disease (all "covid" was only ever a threat to the old/sick), it was released as a type of "weakened live virus" vaccine, which spread even more easily than the other covid-strains, so "out-competed" them in distribution.
>r, I am not talking about the "PCR Tests" - where they cranked-up the amplification-rates to insane-levels,
This is an antivaxxer lie. The PCR tests were 'cranked up' to levels where they were useful, no more.
> to create mostly false-positives,
This is an outright lie. There were, of course, false-positives but the tests were not set specifically to get them.
>because "positive tests" were rewarded with govt-money
so were the negative tests, and in any cases nations WITHOUT these kinds of perverse incentive structures had roughly the same data, at the same rates with the same tests
> - the method used to create the "case-demic" out of healthy people - then, "asymptomatic spread" coming out of that to justify lockdowns,
No, what happened was people misinterpreted what was actually happening -- lungs being filled with fluid, happy hypoxia, and people getting infected and having 'flu-like symptoms' that they attributed to other things -- ie 'symptoms' that patients report are different than observables
> masking non-sick people,
Masking is how to control infection. It is a basic part of infection control. YOU WANT HEALTHY PEOPLE TO BE MASKED SO THEY DON'T GET THE FUCKING VIRUS
> Which takes us back to the apparent stupidity of making the "vaccine" only target one part of the virus,
The vaccine was made to target the one part of the virus because *it worked*.
>vs how the immune system will target mutliple aspects.
You don't want to challenge the immune system with an immune system damaging virus. You don't give people HIV to keep them from getting AIDS, and giving people covid to 'make their immune system protect them from covid' is fucking stupidity
> In this context, until Omicron**, everyone who had SARS had natural-immunity to every variant of "covid,"
1) Which was basically no one, since SARS1 barely infected anyone 2) and it wasn't a full immunity either
> due to common features recognized by the immune system, which did *not* include the "novel" (Moderna's patented) spike-protein.
Again: moderna did not originate the spike protein, your study talking about the odds has had a note added saying how it's wrong, and the virus was a novel virus.
>** Some believe there is no logical mutation pathway to Omicron,
They are wrong
> and noting that it was much less likely to cause severe disease
Also wrong, mostly because the vaccine was out by that point protecting people from the wuhan strains
> (all "covid" was only ever a threat to the old/sick),
This is a lie - covid has killed children in my extended circles even.
> it was released
It wasn't 'released' it was a zoonosis.
> as a type of "weakened live virus" vaccine, which spread even more easily than the other covid-strains, so "out-competed" them in distribution.