Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Ghislaine :dancing_z: (ghislaine@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 05:53:36 JST Ghislaine :dancing_z:
   Checking in on the libs
   • Embed this notice
     Ghislaine :dancing_z: (ghislaine@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 05:53:36 JST Ghislaine :dancing_z:

     in reply to
     “Errrrm why are we punishing her it’s not like this is any different from abortion” - autistic gay furry lib
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 06:02:56 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • yockeypuck
     • Floydian_Psychology :sonnenrad: :windmill_of_friendship: :sonnenrad:
     @yockeypuck @Ghislaine @Floydian_Psychology What's funny is that his consistency is what gets them into trouble. The standard progressive line (now) is "oh gosh no, the instant the baby is born naturally, it's murder killing them - but 10 seconds before and it's just the mother's choice!"
     
     Whereras he's like, poor girl, why blame her for MURDERING HER INFANT? - And the logical question is, is it ok for someone to provide his family with a 1000 week postpartum abortion?
   • Embed this notice
     yockeypuck (yockeypuck@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 06:02:57 JST yockeypuck

     in reply to

     • Floydian_Psychology :sonnenrad: :windmill_of_friendship: :sonnenrad:
     @Ghislaine @Floydian_Psychology He's at least got a consistent philosophy. Humans are clumps of cells to be assembled or dispersed as necessary to help, I dunno, yiffing or whatever he thinks the purpose of life is.
   • Embed this notice
     Floydian_Psychology :sonnenrad: :windmill_of_friendship: :sonnenrad: (floydian_psychology@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 06:02:58 JST Floydian_Psychology :sonnenrad: :windmill_of_friendship: :sonnenrad:

     in reply to
     @Ghislaine has to be satire there's no way
   • Embed this notice
     Ghislaine :dancing_z: (ghislaine@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 06:02:58 JST Ghislaine :dancing_z:

     in reply to

     • Floydian_Psychology :sonnenrad: :windmill_of_friendship: :sonnenrad:
     @Floydian_Psychology It’s not
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 06:04:12 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • Bread up, Bro
     • yockeypuck
     • Floydian_Psychology :sonnenrad: :windmill_of_friendship: :sonnenrad:
     @yockeypuck @Ghislaine @Floydian_Psychology seems like people are being less afraid to say this though.
     BowserNoodle ☦️ repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     yockeypuck (yockeypuck@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 06:12:40 JST yockeypuck

     in reply to

     • Bread up, Bro
     • Floydian_Psychology :sonnenrad: :windmill_of_friendship: :sonnenrad:
     @sickburnbro @Ghislaine @Floydian_Psychology The entire history of libtardism since the Fall is trying to expand the number of humans they can sacrifice to Moloch.
   • Embed this notice
     Vo (vo@noauthority.social)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 09:08:31 JST Vo

     in reply to

     @Ghislaine and they said the defense of post-birth abortion was a slippery slope meme that would never happen

     LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Living Space Studios :verified: (livingspacestudios@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 11:12:58 JST Living Space Studios :verified:

     in reply to

     • Vo
     • ☦️KingOfWhiteAmerica☦️
     @KingOfWhiteAmerica @Vo @Ghislaine Absolutely.
     
     Real or not, The Protocols described everything that has come to pass and it did so decades before any of the famous dystopia literature of the 20th century and with far more accuracy and clarity.
     BowserNoodle ☦️ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Living Space Studios :verified: (livingspacestudios@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 11:12:59 JST Living Space Studios :verified:

     in reply to

     • Vo
     • ☦️KingOfWhiteAmerica☦️
     @KingOfWhiteAmerica @Vo @Ghislaine Probably.
     
     All of these people's talking points and ideas are manufactured for them by monstrous goblins in the media and academia. A small handful of truly evil "people" decided what was a fallacy and what wasn't.
   • Embed this notice
     ☦️KingOfWhiteAmerica☦️ (kingofwhiteamerica@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 11:12:59 JST ☦️KingOfWhiteAmerica☦️

     in reply to

     • Living Space Studios :verified:
     • Vo

     @LivingSpaceStudios @Vo @Ghislaine That’s an establish thing, isn’t it? Attacking Culture by changing the language and the meanings of words ? I feel like that was in the Protocols, even before Newspeak was described in 1984.

   • Embed this notice
     Living Space Studios :verified: (livingspacestudios@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 11:13:00 JST Living Space Studios :verified:

     in reply to

     • Vo
     @Vo @Ghislaine Was there ever a single slippery slope fallacy that didn't turn out to be 100% correct? All of the slippery slope fallacies I remember people talking about when I was a kid all turned out to be completely true.
   • Embed this notice
     ☦️KingOfWhiteAmerica☦️ (kingofwhiteamerica@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 11:13:00 JST ☦️KingOfWhiteAmerica☦️

     in reply to

     • Living Space Studios :verified:
     • Vo

     @LivingSpaceStudios @Vo @Ghislaine I don’t honestly recall anyone calling it a fallacy, until around the early 2000s. People talked about “slippery slopes“ before then, though. Wonder if it was a deliberate attack.

   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 19:25:25 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • Mancow Muller ?
     • VidMasterEon
     • Living Space Studios :verified:
     • Vo
     • lpheathen2
     The slippery slope isn't a fallacy. It's a thought experiment. It's commonly used to explore the boundaries of an idea and to attempt to distinguish a course of action or policy from an extreme, absurd result. If the only defense of the course of action / policy is "trust me bro, that will never happen. You're committing the slippery slope fallacy" the experiment proves that the absurd will be the result. 🤷♂️
   • Embed this notice
     Mancow Muller ? (cowanon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 19:25:26 JST Mancow Muller ?

     in reply to

     • VidMasterEon
     • Living Space Studios :verified:
     • Vo
     • lpheathen2
     You don't seem to understand what the slippery slope fallacy is. It doesn't mean that you can't claim that A -> Z, just that you have to actually provide compelling argument for how that progression will occur. And just because an argument itself might be fallacious, that doesn't mean that the conclusion is necessarily wrong. That is what is known as the fallacy fallacy. You yourself are "poisoning the well" by claiming that those who point out errors in logic are
     >just intellectuals trying to pass off degenerate ideas through “scholarly“ vocabulary use.
   • Embed this notice
     Living Space Studios :verified: (livingspacestudios@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 19:25:31 JST Living Space Studios :verified:

     in reply to

     • VidMasterEon
     • Vo
     @VidMasterEon @Vo @Ghislaine That's an interesting point.
     
     Invoking the phrase "Slippery Slope Fallacy" during an argument has always seemed like a disingenuous argumentation tactic to me and your point about it being an attack on a future argument that may or may not happen instead of the one happening here and now is a pretty good summary of the problem.
     
     It's almost like some kind of temporal strawman attack where you take a future discussion and turn it into a strawman for you to attack rather than have the actual discussion.
   • Embed this notice
     lpheathen2 (lpheathen2@clew.lol)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 19:25:31 JST lpheathen2

     in reply to

     • VidMasterEon
     • Living Space Studios :verified:
     • Vo
     it’s just intellectuals trying to pass off degenerate ideas through “scholarly “ vocabulary use
   • Embed this notice
     VidMasterEon (vidmastereon@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Apr-2025 19:25:32 JST VidMasterEon

     in reply to

     • Living Space Studios :verified:
     • Vo
     @LivingSpaceStudios @Vo @Ghislaine "Slippery slope" is well poisoning
     It is pointing out the inevitable conclusion of your opponents arguments before they are ready to defend then
   • Embed this notice
     Ghislaine :dancing_z: (ghislaine@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jun-2025 04:21:00 JST Ghislaine :dancing_z:

     in reply to

     • Plotinus Enjoyer
     @plotinus_enjoyer A day old baby can easily be taken care of by another woman or by the hospital. adoption exists. mothers die in childbirth and the child can live.
     
     >start of the life cycle
     Sure it *will* grow into a human if nothing is changed but that’s not exactly to say that it is one currently. for instance if a sperm is traveling toward an egg, and unless stopped *will* conceive a child that will also grow into a child, though everyone would agree it is not one.
   • Embed this notice
     Plotinus Enjoyer (plotinus_enjoyer@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jun-2025 04:21:00 JST Plotinus Enjoyer

     in reply to
     @Ghislaine >day old baby can easily be taken care of...
     
     Not the point, the point is dependence of the baby on another.
     
     Even if I were to grant you your point, you will also have to explain to me how this point of yours is not completely facile and actually has some level of significance.
     
     >sperm and egg (I'm shortening these for convenience)...
     
     AFAIK, the chances of one sperm fertilizing an egg is actually very low in the first place. So it is already not guaranteed that an individual sperm will actually reach an egg.
     
     Also, a sperm is a sperm. It can't really be compared to an embryo because a sperm compared to a full human embryo is like, missing half the DNA or something. A sperm by itself will also still remain a sperm unlike a human embryo even if it is fed with food and given time.
     BowserNoodle ☦️ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Plotinus Enjoyer (plotinus_enjoyer@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jun-2025 04:21:01 JST Plotinus Enjoyer

     in reply to
     @Ghislaine To talk about viability of abortion is to miss the point entirely
     
     What is murder? The unjust killing of a human being. So what makes a human foetus any less human than a baby?
   • Embed this notice
     Ghislaine :dancing_z: (ghislaine@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jun-2025 04:21:01 JST Ghislaine :dancing_z:

     in reply to

     • Plotinus Enjoyer
     @plotinus_enjoyer Because it looks like a tadpole and can’t live at all outside of the womb
   • Embed this notice
     Plotinus Enjoyer (plotinus_enjoyer@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jun-2025 04:21:01 JST Plotinus Enjoyer

     in reply to
     @Ghislaine >can’t live at all outside of the womb
     
     If your point is that a foetus is entirely dependent on the mother, the same applies to a day-old baby. Honestly I don’t see that much of a difference between a foetus being dependent on a mother’s umbilical cord and a baby being dependent on a mother’s breast milk or whatever means the mother uses to feed her baby.
     
     >looks like a tadpole
     
     But it is the start of the life cycle of a human and will in fact grow into a human if given enough time and proper nutrition and upbringing. Is it a fully developed human with fully developed abilities, no but so is a day-old baby or a child.
   • Embed this notice
     Plotinus Enjoyer (plotinus_enjoyer@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jun-2025 04:21:02 JST Plotinus Enjoyer

     in reply to
     @Ghislaine Honestly I think he’s correct if you think abortion is ok. Really, where do you draw the line? Any line drawn seems arbitrary.
     
     The only correct way is to also declare that abortion is murder, because that is what it is.
   • Embed this notice
     Ghislaine :dancing_z: (ghislaine@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jun-2025 04:21:02 JST Ghislaine :dancing_z:

     in reply to

     • Plotinus Enjoyer
     @plotinus_enjoyer I think there’s obvious lines between when the baby is viable to induce/ preemie / completely nonviable
   • Embed this notice
     Plotinus Enjoyer (plotinus_enjoyer@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jun-2025 04:21:32 JST Plotinus Enjoyer

     in reply to
     @Ghislaine I already explained to you why I think abortion is murder. The argument I‘ve made previously and stand by is:
     
     1) Murder is the unjust killing of a human being.
     2) A foetus is a human.
     3) Abortion, which is the killing of a foetus, is therefore murder. It is necessarily unjust because the foetus could not possibly do anything on its own.
     
     There is no dogma involved here. There is just an argument taken to its logical conclusion. Abortion, being murder, is therefore in essence really not that different from that leftoid woman brutally cutting open the throat of a baby.
     BowserNoodle ☦️ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Plotinus Enjoyer (plotinus_enjoyer@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jun-2025 04:21:33 JST Plotinus Enjoyer

     in reply to
     @Ghislaine I’m saying your context is flawed
     
     Murder is murder, anything else is not sufficiently significant.
     
     Also, AFAIK abortions can actually be pretty gruesome. They just seem less disgusting because it happens in the womb and therefore not immediately visible to naked eyes.
   • Embed this notice
     Ghislaine :dancing_z: (ghislaine@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jun-2025 04:21:33 JST Ghislaine :dancing_z:

     in reply to

     • Plotinus Enjoyer
     @plotinus_enjoyer If I remember correctly first trimester abortion doesn’t make people squeamish (which is why it’s pretty popular). Plan B and other abortion drugs are totally ick free. Obviously third term abortion is an abomination. even in commiefornia abortion is illegal after fetal viability (which they define as third trimester).
     
     >murder is murder
     is this dogma? you’re not making an argument.
   • Embed this notice
     Ghislaine :dancing_z: (ghislaine@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jun-2025 04:21:34 JST Ghislaine :dancing_z:

     in reply to

     • Plotinus Enjoyer
     @plotinus_enjoyer the context here which seems to have escaped you is that this libtard faggot (and you I guess) are equating slashing an already born, happy, healthy baby’s throat with first term abortion which is frankly insane
   • Embed this notice
     Ghislaine :dancing_z: (ghislaine@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jun-2025 04:21:59 JST Ghislaine :dancing_z:

     in reply to

     • Plotinus Enjoyer
     @plotinus_enjoyer and you use these things to justify the insane claim that plan b (chemical abortion immediately after conception) is equivalent to slashing a baby’s throat. I’m thinking one of your premises is flawed here.
     
     Let’s look at the big picture. Our country is being stolen from us by racial outsiders who are invading our country. I don’t consider it a priority to use state power to mandate that they cannot thin their own numbers. I’d say that keeping invaders and racial others from thinning their own numbers is a negative priority. Preventing white children from being culled is probably a worthy use of state power here but that is not the bulk of abortees. I’ll grant that on the individual level abortion (even plan b) is a sin. But obviously it’s not as great a sin as slashing a baby’s throat. Not all sins are illegal either. Just slapping the “murder” label around willy nilly and demanding state intervention against our interests is stupid and immoral.
     
     Remember the words of the psalmist:
     >O daughter of Babylon, who art to be destroyed; happy shall he be, that rewardeth thee as thou hast served us. Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones. (Psalm 137:8-9, KJV)
     
     You’ve got to look at the big picture.
   • Embed this notice
     Plotinus Enjoyer (plotinus_enjoyer@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jun-2025 04:21:59 JST Plotinus Enjoyer

     in reply to
     @Ghislaine >insane claim
     
     How?
     
     Is killing someone using poison somehow less of an act of murder than brutally ripping out the throat of someone?
     
     One might be more ”civilised” or “less brutal” than the other. That doesn’t mean it’s any less of an act of murder than the other.
     
     >keeping invaders and racial others from thinning their own numbers is a negative priority
     
     Or come up with some other means of making them not a problem instead of abortion?
     
     >not all sins are illegal
     
     So? The law should be just. An unjust law is a mockery.
     
     >demanding state intervention against our interests is stupid and immoral
     
     It’s less about state intervention against your interests but about upholding justice and virtue.
     
     I might also add that if everything is subservient to practical interest then what’s the difference between you and an animal and therefore by extension the same blacks that you dislike so much?
     BowserNoodle ☦️ likes this.