You don't seem to understand what the slippery slope fallacy is. It doesn't mean that you can't claim that A -> Z, just that you have to actually provide compelling argument for how that progression will occur. And just because an argument itself might be fallacious, that doesn't mean that the conclusion is necessarily wrong. That is what is known as the fallacy fallacy. You yourself are "poisoning the well" by claiming that those who point out errors in logic are
>just intellectuals trying to pass off degenerate ideas through “scholarly“ vocabulary use.