Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   ?uper?nekFriend ? (supersnekfriend@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 05-Mar-2025 09:30:25 JST ?uper?nekFriend ?

   • Stanley from Counter Strike: Condition Zero (2004)
   • Goalkeeper
   • NotAWeeb
   • Cobalt Sasquatch
   @Curvin @NotAWeeb @Goalkeeper @CobaltSasquatch
   Lesson: It's better to die of lung cancer than it is to become a white-colored nigger. :02nod:
   
   RT: https://poa.st/objects/b327e07e-942a-4d85-9929-4e8379733e3e
   • Embed this notice
     ?uper?nekFriend ? (supersnekfriend@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 05-Mar-2025 09:30:24 JST ?uper?nekFriend ?

     in reply to

     • Stanley from Counter Strike: Condition Zero (2004)
     • Branman65?
     • Goalkeeper
     • NotAWeeb
     • Cobalt Sasquatch
     @branman65 @CobaltSasquatch @Curvin @Goalkeeper @NotAWeeb
     I have not seen any report on lung cancer and weed and other THC products. I know the general consensus is that you have far less risk of lung cancer smoking cannabis than you do smoking tobacco. All I know is that brain functions suffer from long-term THC consumption.
     
     The research may have changed and I simply didn't see anything on cancer. :02_shrug:
     BowserNoodle ☦️ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Branman65? (branman65@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 05-Mar-2025 09:30:25 JST Branman65?

     in reply to

     • Stanley from Counter Strike: Condition Zero (2004)
     • Goalkeeper
     • NotAWeeb
     • Cobalt Sasquatch
     @SuperSnekFriend @CobaltSasquatch @Curvin @Goalkeeper @NotAWeeb you get lung cancer either way, weed or tobacco. the question is, do you want it the gay or normal way?
   • Embed this notice
     Branman65? (branman65@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 05-Mar-2025 09:30:38 JST Branman65?

     in reply to

     • Stanley from Counter Strike: Condition Zero (2004)
     • Goalkeeper
     • NotAWeeb
     • Cobalt Sasquatch
     @SuperSnekFriend @CobaltSasquatch @Curvin @Goalkeeper @NotAWeeb I don't see why it would not give you cancer
   • Embed this notice
     ?uper?nekFriend ? (supersnekfriend@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 05-Mar-2025 09:30:38 JST ?uper?nekFriend ?

     in reply to

     • Stanley from Counter Strike: Condition Zero (2004)
     • Branman65?
     • Goalkeeper
     • NotAWeeb
     • Cobalt Sasquatch
     @branman65 @CobaltSasquatch @Curvin @Goalkeeper @NotAWeeb
     Tobacco gives you lung cancer because of the micro-damage of your lung cells all the tar and other byproducts causes. That damage creates malformed telomere which then creates the cancer cells in your lungs after sufficient reproduction to outweigh immune destruction of cancer cells.
     
     Cannabis does not produce as much tar and other crap like tobacco, so what matters is how THC interacts with cell reproduction in your lungs. I'm not a pulmonologist or oncologist, so I just don't know enough to give you the right answer. :02_shrug:
     BowserNoodle ☦️ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     BowserNoodle ☦️ (bowsacnoodle@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 05-Mar-2025 09:36:42 JST BowserNoodle ☦️

     in reply to

     • Stanley from Counter Strike: Condition Zero (2004)
     • Branman65?
     • Goalkeeper
     • NotAWeeb
     • Cobalt Sasquatch
     @SuperSnekFriend @branman65 @CobaltSasquatch @Curvin @Goalkeeper @NotAWeeb DARE propaganda said it has several times as much tar and carcinogens as tobacco smoke. I don't believe the cilia are paralyzed by cannabis smoke the way they are from tobacco smoke, so that fact is a bit questionable. Tests can be run to make any "smoke" or inhaled substance seem better or worse depending on the parameters. I remember the infamous "vaping bad" study that used old 1+ ohm cotton rigs and pulled sustained 30 second drags which would've been dry burning hits 5 seconds in (impossible to breathe this in btw) to show how vaping has tons of carcinogens. Most of the studies are agenda driven funded for anything. Reality is smoking anything is unhealthy even though it's enjoyable, and vaping is less harmful but gayer looking than smoking.