> Nearly 500,000 Californians have turned to the state’s insurer of last resort, the FAIR Plan, which has doubled in size over the past five years. The state is now exposed to nearly $458 billion in potential damage, a figure that has nearly tripled since 2020.
> Pacific Palisades is also the state’s fifth-largest user of FAIR policies, with nearly $6 billion in exposure. Even a fraction of that amount would exceed the capabilities of FAIR, which at last report had about $700 million in cash.
LMAO the state insurance is exposed to $458B but they only have $700M?????
What happens then??? California cannot print money; they are not the Federal gov
@feld > insurer of last resort This is the problem. If no private insurer wants to insure your house that’s likely to burn, that might be a sign that you should get a house somewhere else
@sun@feld if it’s capitalism and they got a capitalist insurance on the free market and the insurer goes bust, then it’s capitalism that they don’t get their money and should have chosen a better insurer
@11112011@feld@lain Have you ever seen what happens to a concrete structure in that situation? I've seen where CalTrans had to remove and replace roads and bridges through burned areas.
@tk@Nimbius666@feld AI might finally put an end to loop-hole scams lobbyists sneak into bills before they are voted on, or not. SCOTUS' recent decision on the arbitrary rules of executive agencies (citation needed), might also add transparency. Or not.
@polarisera@tk@feld most of this insurance is a hangover from the earliest era of California's manifest destiny push. The anzo borrego desertification and Salton sea type stuff....
Americans literally believed it was not only possible but their duty to bend nature to their will and things like this only spiraled out of control as climate change ramped up. They were never sustainable. No one should live in areas of desert prone to annual fires as part of their ecosystem.