frogzone
BANKS ATTACKING PEOPLE who learn what money is?!
hi folks, im informed that this video is about the banks attack on people who use the people's money (bitcoin) circa 2013.... it may involve pre-crime "initiatives".
Privacy conscious folk tend to not have access to screwtube even via invidious, so if u think is worthy, maybe it might find its way to a :peertube:PeerTube instance or something?
(screw)tube.com/watch?v=VbFoRNJf1zU
Gabe
@frogzone@wizard.casa banks attack on people who use the people's money (bitcoin) circa 2013.... it may involve pre-crime "initiatives".Taking it another way... What if the plan was always to control who could buy in early?
@jeffcliff@shitposter.world @realcaseyrollins@noauthority.social @sun@shitposter.world
frogzone
@gabriel @realcaseyrollins @sun @jeffcliff there is a dilemma here, because by killing people's access off u also destroy the industry. So i lean towards choking off the industry, and at the very least harming those brightest entrepreneurs in society who'd have been able to go on and add value to people's lives. Ultimately is it about the banksters wanting to maintain control over people.
the banksters are basically conducting crimes against humanity, and i would personally like to see the harshest penalties possible for these pre-crime-style persecutions that they've been conducting under the banner of limiting "risk".
(edit for brevity/mistakes)
frogzone
@gabriel @realcaseyrollins @sun @jeffcliff it would not be too difficult to proof collusion if bankers were deliberately choking people's access to frontrun, because theyd need to buy up bitcoins and so the methods that they employ to buy them would easily be revealed either by the miners hemselves who would need to have some sort of understanding as to why the bankster can't simply buy the bitcoin through the usual channels. i really do believe that it would be too risky for the banksters to conspire in this way.
but yeah, it is possible but i think if it were proved then those involved would face even harsher penalties, ankle bracelet for life, no ability to own real estate, etc. i would force them to have a tattoo of that misdeed between their thumb and forfinger on their right hand so they can't shake hands without fear of exposing the cruel fraudster there are.
frogzone
@gabriel @realcaseyrollins @sun @jeffcliff the ankle bracelet and inability to own land should be a punishment for banksters and communications compnies who cut off people's access to services because of their speech or associations, or currency preference. A person who wants to own the people's money, ie. bitcoin should never have been persecuted.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.