Since the tankies seem to be coming out again, a reminder:
👉 If Russia stops fighting, there will no longer be a war.
👉 If Ukraine stops fighting, there will no longer be an Ukraine.
Since the tankies seem to be coming out again, a reminder:
👉 If Russia stops fighting, there will no longer be a war.
👉 If Ukraine stops fighting, there will no longer be an Ukraine.
@paguro oh I see we have an "it's only imperialism if the occupied land is measured in imperial units" kind of a person.
How quaint, haven't seen that on here for a while! :blobcatcoffee:
@rysiek If Ukraine keeps selling their valuable farmland to the western conglomerates like Bayer (former Monsanto) and friends, there will no longer be an Ukraine even sooner.
P.s. blackmailing other countries into giving money to buy deadly weapons that get smashed and torn to pieces by the Russians isn't good looks.
> posts Kremlin's propaganda
> Joined Nov 20, 2024
> mastodon.social
right.
@rysiek What kind of tankies would support *either* side of the war?! Most of whom I would call tankies just oppose war, period. And those who aren’t tankies…well, no support for the imperialist proxy war.
I *would* like for Russia to stop the senseless fighting altogether and leave Donbas, Donetsk, and Luhansk, and I do not believe this can be accomplished by throwing more weapons at Ukraine.
@rysiek The ‘liberal position’ of unconditionally supporting Ukraine past the point of reclaiming their territories and invading Russia back actually scares me more than the Russian invasion itself. Western media is scarily competent at whipping up the public into bloodthirsty frenzy, and they manage to do all this without the prompting of their governments.
> The ‘liberal position’ of unconditionally supporting Ukraine past the point of reclaiming their territories and invading Russia back actually scares me …
I am also quite scared of a bunch of imaginary things, but then I remembered: they are imaginary!
I highly recommend that strategy.
"Look I oppose all violence, so even if the bigger stronger bully started the fight, the weaker kid should just stop fighting."
That's very much supporting the bully.
@gubi if you took a moment to scroll through the thread, you would find that somebody already asked pretty much the same question, and got an answer:
https://mstdn.social/@rysiek/113517351416546490
@rysiek so what would you suggest to Palestine according to this logic?
@gubi likewise.
@rysiek that one was not an answer, looks like a nice attempt of dodging a reasoning flaw. BTW, I answered to your "answer". 😉
@rysiek @enoch_exe_inc I’m thinking in longer terms than that. What happens if throwing more weapons at the problem results in a forever war that leaves Ukraine utterly devastated and forever dependent on foreign economic aid? That’s actually one of the reasons why Ukraine got into this mess in the first place, but I digress.
Can’t we do better than perpetual war? History says we can, but won’t…and that’s unacceptable.
@enoch_exe_inc we can do better than perpetual war, but that requires that we deal with bullies decisively.
Dealing with that particular bully indecisively over the last 20-odd years is how we got into this mess. Moldova, Georgia, Syria…
The line must be drawn somewhere, and it might as well be here.
@rysiek @enoch_exe_inc Can’t we have peace talks? Negotiations? A violent revolution in Russia, Ukraine, and the United States that overthrows their imperialist governments? Nope. I guess that while these are certainly solutions that would benefit the people living in these countries, it certainly wouldn’t benefit the ruling class nor line the pockets of the military-industrial complex.
@enoch_exe_inc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_die_for_Danzig%3F
@enoch_exe_inc first of all, I don't think the hundreds of thousands killed and wounded over the last 1000 days of war in Ukraine are a "drop of blood".
Secondly, I think we are smart enough to be able to walk and chew gum. Imperialism and colonialism are bad regardless who perpetrates them. I protested against Iraq invasion, I loathe US colonialism.
But that doesn't make what Kremlin is doing in Ukraine a "dick move" – it is still state terrorism, attempted genocide, and a war of aggression.
@rysiek @enoch_exe_inc By the way, what counts as “bullying”? Oh, I agree that invading Ukraine is a dick move by Russia…but, compared to the United States, it’s a single drop of blood compared to the bucketfuls of blood that repeatedly pour over the heads of nearly every single country in the Global South. Again, not a justification or a defence, but have to face facts: #WeAreTheBaddies.
@rysiek I just want to thank you for this whole thread if for no other reason you surfaced a bunch of accounts I could safely block!
@rysiek @enoch_exe_inc It’s a “dick move” in that it’s unnecessarily excessive. Despite what the wartime propaganda would have you believe, there *are* in fact a lot of far-right Ukrainian nationalists and literal Nazis—but invading the country is hardly a way to get rid of them. Oh, wait, what was that about containment and the Vietnam War?
In fighting ‘to the last drop of Ukrainian blood’, whose blood will we use when once the last drop of blood has been spilt?
@enoch_exe_inc literal Nazis exist in every country on Earth. It was always a pretext, and a poor one at that.
But people gobbled this up, and to my utter surprise are still repeating it – even in the face of the fact that the Russian state is better described in these terms today than Ukrainian state ever was:
https://theconversation.com/yes-putin-and-russia-are-fascist-a-political-scientist-shows-how-they-meet-the-textbook-definition-179063
@lerxst my absolute pleasure, that was one of the reasons for it – and boy did they fall for it! :blobcatgiggle:
For anyone who in good faith wants to better understand the deep background of Russian invasion in Ukraine, this is *the* resource:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLh9mgdi4rNewfxO7LhBoz_1Mx1MaO6sw_
It's truly captivating, and dispels a bunch of myths, half-truths, and pieces of disinformation around Ukraine and the war, by means of a deep-dive into the history.
I linked to this a bunch of times in the responses to responses below, but it is too important and too valuable to linger in the depths.
@migurski already! Man, thatw as fast, I posted this like 5min ago!
:blobcatpeek:
Seriously though, same. And will probably listen to it again soon.
@rysiek I’ve listened to this all the way through twice now, it’s so good
@wronglang I usually don't see much of them, but recently they figured out they might try to capitalize on the fear around yet another empty threat of using nuclear weapons by Kremlin, it seems. 🤷♀️
Same as the last 5 or whatever times Kremlin threatened such use.
@rysiek wow, there are a lot of tankies in here!
@mcv @rysiek @enoch_exe_inc The supporters of Ukraine want peace? I find that hard to believe with continual arms shipments, windfall profits for arms manufacturers, and exploitation of Ukraine’s labour and natural resources.
@enoch_exe_inc @mcv thank Dog Russian labor is not exploited, Russian arms manufacturers are not making a killing, and natural resources in territories already colonized by Russia are not being exploited!
How is this never part of the conversation, somehow?
How is it not part of the conversation that Kremlin attempts a double genocide: that of Ukrainians, but also that of peoples from Dagestan, Buryatia, and so on?
https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/09/23/russia-partial-military-mobilization-ethnic-minorities/
@rysiek @enoch_exe_inc You got me; I have nothing left to say to you war maniacs.
What’s been happening in Ukraine (and Israel, and other wars we supposedly peaceful, democratic countries inexplicably support) has made me take a long hard look in the mirror, and I’ve concluded that we are exactly as responsible for the war in Ukraine as Russian disinformation alleges. They’re right—for all the wrong reasons—but they’re still right regardless.
The war maniacs are Putin and his supporters. The supporters of Ukraine want peace, not war. But occupation and genocide aren't peace. The war maniacs are the people who want Russia to have its way with Ukraine.
@enoch_exe_inc @mcv how is it that supporters of a right of an invaded, weaker country are called "war maniacs", and not the supporters of the much bigger, invading country?
And how, pray tell, should the peace be achieved if one side is constantly breaking agreements it signed, from the Budapest Memorandum, through Minsk Agreements?
How, exactly, do you think there can be peace in Ukraine, if Putin's stated goal is for Ukraine not to exist?
"Those supporters of the bullied kid are violence maniacs! They keep using violence to try to intervene and stop the bully!"
This is really incredibly tiresome and repetitive. You really need better talking points at this stage, we've been through all of this a bunch of times. :blobcatcoffee:
@rysiek @enoch_exe_inc Don’t misrepresent me. I don’t directly oppose the current course of actions, but…it has not significantly changed the situation since a thousand days ago.
It’s scary to see how many “liberals” are so totalitarian that simply expressing a desire not to *prolong* the war is met with petty insults, death threats, and attempts to silence all dissent.
@enoch_exe_inc I agree with the desire to not prolong the war.
I simply disagree that making the war end on Russian terms (which stopping to arm Ukraine would cause) is a way to actually stop it.
We literally tried that exact strategy in that exact place in 2014. And now here we are.
@rysiek @enoch_exe_inc Twenty years ago, it was conservatives and the Iraq War. I’ve always assumed it was an inherent trait of conservatism to be a bloodthirsty warmonger. Now, it turns out liberals are no different.
@enoch_exe_inc it's nice to have this simple, clean division of people into "conservatives" and "liberals". I happen not to identify with either though. Not sure why you keep throwing these terms around.
@rysiek @enoch_exe_inc I don’t want to end the war on Russian terms either. But I also don’t want billions of dollars in weapons thrown willy-nilly into Ukraine with no way of knowing where they’ll end up or what kinds of militant groups may end up using them against us in the future.
That’s what happened during the Soviet-Afghanistan War, and we got 9/11 and the whole War on Terror in return. There has to be a way to stop this without causing blowback. There has to be.
@enoch_exe_inc well let me know if you come up with one. I would gladly support it.
Meanwhile, I will continue to support the invaded country against its genocidal invader.
@NeonPurpleStar @enoch_exe_inc @rysiek Bernie Sanders and AOC are Social Democrats, a position I don’t agree with as much as I used to, but it’s one I’ll tolerate because it’s by far the most realistic “better option” the United States can become.
That said, there aren’t very many of them. In fact, those two are the only ones that come to mind. Does this strike you as a bit of a problem when it comes to affecting change?
@caffeinatedbookdragon my first karaoke experience was when I was 14 and at an English language student exchange camp in Edinburgh.
I remember it being pretty meh (still no fan of karaoke), but for that one Italian girl my age who asked for Zombie.
The DJ tried to suggest something "easier to sing" (and I don't blame him, there's been a lot of very bad attempts that evening), but she was adamant.
She rocked it. Absolutely rocked it. It was a thing to behold and I still remember it decades on.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.