Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Trevor Goodchild:verified::pondering_orb: (trevorgoodchild@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 00:16:24 JST Trevor Goodchild:verified::pondering_orb:
   Deliciously devious (if it works)
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 00:16:22 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • jb
     @jb @TrevorGoodchild this is still just plain 3-d chess.
     
     But if he isn't a useless bitch in his second term, letting people fuck him over to find who was actually loyal to america over the long term is 4-d chess.
     BowserNoodle ☦️ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     jb (jb@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 00:16:23 JST jb

     in reply to
     Actual 4-D chess
     BowserNoodle ☦️ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 00:17:16 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • Matty
     @matty @TrevorGoodchild it means in theory he's not interested in congress pulling their shit and delaying confirmations because he wants to actually do things day 1.
     BowserNoodle ☦️ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Matty (matty@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 00:17:17 JST Matty

     in reply to
     What does this even mean
     BowserNoodle ☦️ repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     NoDoxGregBrady (nodoxgregbrady@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 00:23:21 JST NoDoxGregBrady

     in reply to

     • Matty
     @matty @TrevorGoodchild IT MEANS TRUST THE MOTHERFUCKING PLAN BITCH OUR MAN WILL HAVE THIS SHIT WRAPPED UP FOR GOOD IN TWO FUCKING WEEKS
   • Embed this notice
     Matty (matty@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 00:33:21 JST Matty

     in reply to
     Hmm 4D chess, let's see if he does something very cool
   • Embed this notice
     Trevor Goodchild:verified::pondering_orb: (trevorgoodchild@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 00:33:21 JST Trevor Goodchild:verified::pondering_orb:

     in reply to

     • Matty
     @matty It requires House of Representative cooperation so I'm not holding my breath. On the other hand, Reps are far more vulnerable to voter punishment than 6 year term Senators (Thune can stonewall cheeto boy until 2028)
     
     We will see in a few weeks, and note that tangerine man got a cool ZERO recess appointments during his entire first term
     Bread up, Bro likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Trevor Goodchild:verified::pondering_orb: (trevorgoodchild@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 00:33:22 JST Trevor Goodchild:verified::pondering_orb:

     in reply to

     • Matty
     @matty >fat orange retard cannot staff his Cabinet without Senate approval and a vote on the floor (this is how they hamstrung him 2016-2020, he couldn't get any of the people he wanted through McConnell's Senate)
     
     >fat orange retard DOES have the ability to unilaterally staff his Cabinet and put in who he wants without a vote if the Senate is in 'recess' (these are called recess appointments and Bush got to do this over 100 times when he was President)
     
     >fat orange retard has the power, as head of the Executive Branch, to 'adjourn' the Senate if he calls for a Convention of both Houses (House of Representatives plus Senate) and there is 'Case of Disagreement' between them
     
     >this would put the Senate and House into forcible recess, until a time of his choosing
     
     It's actually . . . clever
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 00:35:05 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • Matty
     @TrevorGoodchild @matty the smartest thing to do is to what is being done now - leak these plans out now, publicly deny them to preserve optionality and fear, and hand the senate a list of recess appointments day 1 and say I expect this tomorrow.
   • Embed this notice
     Trevor Goodchild:verified::pondering_orb: (trevorgoodchild@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 01:53:35 JST Trevor Goodchild:verified::pondering_orb:

     in reply to

     • Matty
     • Spergo1875
     @Spergo1875 @matty I don't have any faith but I do want to see new tactics in action
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 01:53:35 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • Matty
     • Spergo1875
     @TrevorGoodchild @Spergo1875 @matty faith is earned.
   • Embed this notice
     Spergo1875 (spergo1875@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 01:53:36 JST Spergo1875

     in reply to

     • Matty
     @TrevorGoodchild @matty It'll still be done halfassed at best, as everything is with him.
     Just like the border wall could have been built with defense funds they had secured, and send the Army corps of engineers to do it.
     Didn't happen.
     He promised to get rid of birthright citizenship last time too.
     Didn't happen.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 01:54:24 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • alchemy
     • jb
     @alchemy @jb @TrevorGoodchild I mean the only power player that matters a lot here is musk, because he risked not only his money but his face.
   • Embed this notice
     alchemy (alchemy@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 01:54:25 JST alchemy

     in reply to

     • Bread up, Bro
     • jb
     @sickburnbro @jb @TrevorGoodchild It might be classic Trump negotiation tactics of comming out with a crazy initial offer to throw the opposition off before getting as favorable terms as possible. That and dread is probably right about power players backing him getting what they want, after playing to the base and making a spectacle.
     Bread up, Bro likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Trevor Goodchild:verified::pondering_orb: (trevorgoodchild@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 04:29:38 JST Trevor Goodchild:verified::pondering_orb:

     in reply to
     @Largo @matty Article II, Section 3 Executive Branch Duties
     
     ". . . he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper . . ."
     
     Seems pretty flexible ngl
   • Embed this notice
     Largo (largo@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 04:29:39 JST Largo

     in reply to

     • Matty
     @TrevorGoodchild @matty Rare fat tangerine man 4D chess move.
     
     Is there any limit on this recess, or could Tangerine man theoretically just hold the legislature hostage indefinitely?
   • Embed this notice
     AlabasterBrick ?‍☠️ (alabasterbrick@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 04:30:17 JST AlabasterBrick ?‍☠️

     in reply to

     • Largo
     • WilhelmIII
     • Special Guest Star
     • AlyoCat
     • Meanwhile In Ohio...
     • Wignatia
     >cutie pie wife
     >had pron problem
     Total faggotass
   • Embed this notice
     WilhelmIII (wilhelmiii@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 04:30:18 JST WilhelmIII

     in reply to

     • Largo
     • Special Guest Star
     • Meanwhile In Ohio...
     • Wignatia

     Johnson was all "MAGA!" and then got an FBI briefing and started doing whatever the Biden regime wanted.

     Apparently they showed him something from his past that didn't want the public to know.

     If he's compromised then another briefing from Trump's team can get him do do what they want instead.

   • Embed this notice
     AlyoCat (aly@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 04:30:18 JST AlyoCat

     in reply to

     • Largo
     • WilhelmIII
     • Special Guest Star
     • Meanwhile In Ohio...
     • Wignatia
     @WilhelmIII @s2208 @MeanwhileInOhio @Largo @LawrenceGerald @TrevorGoodchild Speaker Johnson adopted a teenage nigger as part of some cult church project. ( Despite the fact that the boy had a home and a mother and was akshully never adopted and kept his last name and moved back with his mother when he was 18)
     Speaker Johnson and his nigger boy were eachother's "accountability partners" and monitored eachother's online porn intake, according to the Speaker
   • Embed this notice
     Wignatia (lawrencegerald@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 04:30:19 JST Wignatia

     in reply to

     • Largo
     • Meanwhile In Ohio...
     @TrevorGoodchild @MeanwhileInOhio @Largo I feel like Q failed to predict this
   • Embed this notice
     Special Guest Star (s2208@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 04:30:19 JST Special Guest Star

     in reply to

     • Largo
     • Meanwhile In Ohio...
     • Wignatia
     So how likely is it that the Speaker goes along with this? What’s the carrot? What’s the stick?
   • Embed this notice
     Trevor Goodchild:verified::pondering_orb: (trevorgoodchild@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 04:30:20 JST Trevor Goodchild:verified::pondering_orb:

     in reply to

     • Largo
     • Meanwhile In Ohio...
     @MeanwhileInOhio @Largo Largo was just asking how long the adjournment was supposed to last. I know the House needs to be involved if he's trying to end-run the Senate which is why I think this is a long shot unless he has some hidden leverage
   • Embed this notice
     Meanwhile In Ohio... (meanwhileinohio@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 04:30:21 JST Meanwhile In Ohio...

     in reply to

     • Matty
     • Largo
     I think it's a little more limited than that:
     "and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper;"
     
     https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-2/section-3/
   • Embed this notice
     AlabasterBrick ?‍☠️ (alabasterbrick@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 04:59:42 JST AlabasterBrick ?‍☠️

     in reply to

     • Largo
     • WilhelmIII
     • Special Guest Star
     • AlyoCat
     • Meanwhile In Ohio...
     • Wignatia
     Disgusting, coal burned. Must pay toll.
   • Embed this notice
     AlyoCat (aly@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 04:59:43 JST AlyoCat

     in reply to

     • AlabasterBrick ?‍☠️
     • Largo
     • WilhelmIII
     • Special Guest Star
     • Meanwhile In Ohio...
     • Wignatia
     @AlabasterBrick @MeanwhileInOhio @WilhelmIII @s2208 @Largo @LawrenceGerald @TrevorGoodchild This is a picture of the Speaker's wife holding her newborn baby along with her two biological sons and her adopted son 👀
   • Embed this notice
     alchemy (alchemy@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 05:14:02 JST alchemy

     in reply to

     • Bread up, Bro
     • jb
     @sickburnbro @jb @TrevorGoodchild I was referencing judge dreads team a/b conceptual model so there are players higher than musk or trump who those two take orders from.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 05:14:02 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • alchemy
     • jb
     @alchemy @jb @TrevorGoodchild right. what I'm saying is that you're always going to have power players. The only question is are they out in the obvious or are they hiding? We've had a lot of sneaky backroom shit in the past 20 years.
     
     Musk is different in that he is a power player that has been not only out in front but at a level of personal investment we have never seen. The closest to this is Soros, but he hasn't been on stages in fronts of millions of people with a man who was almost killed.
     
     I don't buy the whole spectacle thing here because if this is a spectacle ( thus you are getting fucked ) then the question is why - the answer is normally "because powerful people are getting what they want rather than you" -
     
     but the question is why would trump have more loyality to them - the a/b answer is "because they control him", but this is where the whole a/b falls apart - if they are truly "running things" trump is a bad puppet. And a bad puppet who almost gets killed is a very bad puppet.
   • Embed this notice
     alchemy (alchemy@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 06:25:55 JST alchemy

     in reply to

     • Bread up, Bro
     • jb
     @sickburnbro @jb @TrevorGoodchild Its not control in the sense of puppet but like agents in a firm. Big shareholders influence a board which sets goals. individual agents try to meet those goals and jockey for positions. they have some freedom in hitting targets given they don't cross certain red lines. Trump is loyal to the extent he would lose position and assets. Trump was onice till nothing else worked. Bance was lined up before as the bone to throw to middle America
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 15-Nov-2024 06:25:55 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • alchemy
     • jb
     @alchemy @jb @TrevorGoodchild That's not a bad theory, but it's too "just fits" - Trump was doing his thing until 2015, why bother running for president?
     
     If anything the shareholders theory implies that he had shareholders in 2016 who brought all the GOP faggots on board, and then they mismanaged 2020 and now when the stock tanked he bought them out and is free of a huge amount of their influence.