I wonder if linux audiophiles are a thing.
"plain ALSA sounds warmer than pipewire"
"linux kernel compiled with ALSR makes for a more chaotic high end"
"ext2 sounds better than ext4"
I wonder if linux audiophiles are a thing.
"plain ALSA sounds warmer than pipewire"
"linux kernel compiled with ALSR makes for a more chaotic high end"
"ext2 sounds better than ext4"
@q66 @vidister the OSS thing might not even be wrong because some distros don't install libasound plugins so it'll do linear interpolation resampling instead of speexrate by default 🙃
@vidister i've seen people argue that oss sounds better than alsa soooooo
(and i've seen audiophiles talk about sound differences with ssds and ethernet cables so...)
@q66 @hanscees @vidister audiophile bs makes a lot more sense once you understand that it's all men going through a midlife crisis
@q66 @vidister you need a sata drive with 5200 spinning for good sounds for sure
@hanscees @vidister audiophiles are so funny because you can make up literally whatever nonsense and still be sure some of them will unironically claim it's true
@mia @vidister in a typical setup you are not resampling, because it's all 44.1k, unless you have an extensive opus collection or something (and most people don't)
@lanodan @vidister @mia both 24bit and high sample rate are, you don't get to reach the limitations of either in practice (e.g. my upper hearing limit is ~19500 which is still well below the nyquist frequency for 44.1k, and that's unusual for a person my age, a lot of people don't even get to reach 17k)
if anything if your audio *does* contain frequencies above those ~22k, it's probably pretty bad because audio gear is flawed and it's a lot easier to turn that kinda thing into distortion
@lanodan @vidister @mia the bit depth determines the dynamic range (i.e. difference between loudest and quietest sound), traditionally calculated as `6 * nbits` which for 16 bits amounts to 96dB, but in practice that measurement is wrong and it's a lot more than that
old, but always good reading: https://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
@newt @vidister @lanodan
you know what's the worst?
That I can't outright rule out there being a difference. There's so much stuff going on a CPU with all kinds of interactions...
Although...
Ok maybe we can figure out some rules:
As long as there is no XRUN, can the soundcard be affected by the stuff going on on the CPU?
@lanodan @vidister @newt
Optical SPDIF of course to avoid grounding issues?
@lanodan @vidister @newt
until your computer's ground is capacitively coupled to 115V AC (half of mains) and your signal cable's shield is the only thing connecting it to actual ground...
(had that happen with a raspi and a USB cable, to the point the USB device would keep disconecting...)
@Natanox @pesekcuy @vidister @lanodan @newt
I'm guessing at some point it figured out it's spending too much money on treating people who damaged their hearing by listening to music too loud.
Or it found a study saying how headphones mess with peoples' perception of volume, such that people are unable to notice they've set it too loud before damaging their hearing.
@pesekcuy @vidister @wolf480pl @lanodan @newt Okay, now I'm curious why the EU would implement something stupid like this.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.