My 80-year-old mother-on-law just installed Linux Mint MATE on a laptop last week and is happily posting boomer memes to Facebook.
While there is some hardware that is problematic, it's not like telling everyone that any CPU without TPM 2.0 is verboten. Because grandma is not going to be able to do the things you suggest to fix that.
Windows 7 was superior in everyway to Linux. 11 is more of a parallel grade program.
Spent hours and hours looking into potentially switching over and I can say without a doubt, Linux is simply for people who talk loud to make themselves look smart.
...And probably pan handle at the nearest highway exit
🤷 Why do that to yourself. Windows is out of the box ready
It really, really sucked back then. Compiling kernels so they would actually run on my hardware, living with terrible gaming because all of the video drivers had to be reverse engineered, really crappy substitute programs that got abandoned.
Yep, went through it all.
But as a professional IT person, I saw that Windows was the number one source of spam from bots. A newly installed Windows 7 box that was exposed to the Internet would become a bot server in minutes.
Where as Ubuntu listened on zero ports with the default install.
And now, when I can run Office 365 software in a browser, when Steam has Proton and runs games reliable enough that they are making bank selling a Linux device to run Windows games, when Windows 11 is basically an app for Microsoft to spy on you and sell your data and push their spam at you...
A Linux Mint desktop, on hardware that was thoughtfully chosen, simply works.
There is no way that most of your users would love Linux on the Desktop, even stable linux distros are not really that.....stable. They only way the Linux Desktop is good in the Enterprise or Schools is via ChromeOS because it's locked down and limited to "Just Works" tech.
Every time one I'm interested in that might support the idea, they sell out to the jew 'going public' psyop and that inexplicably means squashing technological innovation.
@WilhelmIII@Omega_Variant@The_Almighty_Kek@tyler@verita84eva Been using Linux (started with Slackware -- 14 3.5" floppies (or flippies, as we sometimes called them)) since 1995. Started using the "Mother's Day" release of Red Hat Linux (version 3.0.3) on an Digital Alpha UDB (aka Multia) when I discovered Red Hat before anyone knew who they were. (Dammit. *Just* missed Mother's Day release being a strange synchronicity.)
Yes, it was painful, but I was a system administrator using various company's versions of Unix and actually had an OSF/1 (later Digital Unix) desktop at work. So it was my *job* to get things working. When Linux came along it was just a natural to put it on my company issued laptop.
Never used anything since (except for 4 months I won't talk about). Where I am now, the company supports Windows and Mac. I use Fedora Linux. Linux is 'tolerated' but not supported. I've had my share of small problems going against the grain. But especially lately, I've heard so many gripes from my coworkers about the problems they are having with their company issued desktops or laptops, that I've started to tell them that I don't want to hear any more nonsense from them about "why do you bother using Linux because it's too much work to keep things working with company infrastructure?" Yeah. About that, you sycophants.
I do have one windows pc in my office. It runs quickbooks, so I get that.
I do recall seeing something recently that allows windows applications to be ran in their own windows, but in vm (not wine). My memory may be bad though.
I think the key would be cloning a central system that's fixed. I think the problems start to arise when different people have different setups. Thus, I'd make the build as robust as possible to avoid having a bunch of user specific issues. Companies do this with windows VMs and thin clients all the time.
But I get the issue you're pointing at. Trust me. I have about 20 computers running various builds, some general use, some for specific purposes. It is a bit of work to maintain, though I've automated a bit via cron.
Back to the point. An app that is Windows only (much less common today for business critical functions) has zero to do with the 'everything just works' on Windows claims. Having an app that only runs on Windows does not make Windows any less shitty.
When windows doesn't work. It just doesn't work. I used windows for a few years when I first started practicing. I probably had a borked update every other month, and would have to wait two hours for it to repair. I have never had such global problems with Linux.
App specific problems, sure. But I've never had anything that wasn't solvable. Linux is like a tank built from parts borrowed from the army surplus store.
Quickbooks is gay. The desktop version I'm running lacks very basic features like importing time sheets at all, even from csv or excel (they wanted people to pay extra for that feature). Time has to be hand entered.
quick books is fake and gay. Those twats have been charging me $89/month for payroll services I DONT USE. And literally can't unsubscribe. I'm getting a new damn card
I have trust accounts I have to keep track of, and the bar can randomly audit. Thus, I prefer to use software where they can't question the reports.
There are some linux solutions, but it would take a bit if elbow grease to get setup and have to limit my projects. I'm almost done with my latest, so I may look at that again.
I know, but why even use quickbooks. I just import my bank statements, convert them to csv, but them into sheets and then sort them and batch organize.
Nothing just works on linux, except maybe manjaro, who does a fair job of having proper conf files at package install.
Most other build require some work, and it can be confusing to noobs because most programs use a client-server model, e.g. mpd, that require that they rtfm.
Are you retarded? The Use Case is everything. If you need something that only runs on windows or runs better there, you need windows. You sound like you are making the assumption that software on Windows can't 'Just Work'.
My entire argument is that Windows is a better desktop experience overall for the end-user
You can make usable profit/loss, balance sheet, ect with google sheets. It's not that hard to replicate like most of quickbooks functionality. I'm sure there are more complex things you may use, (payroll being the main one) it's super easy to make it yourself
If you're running i3wm and want your laptop to lock on lid close, you have to edit logind, then add xss-lock -- i3lock to your i3 config, and reboot. Just sayin..
I think windows is better for normies, but for the "power user" Linux will always be superior. One major reason is because a lot of the software available is comprehensive. While it does take some elbow grease, I've always been impressed by the fact that when I need some particular app to do something, either the app developer has already added such a feature, usually due to a long history of community input, or someone has a fork or another app that carries the weight. Basically, linux comes with a focus group and the apps reflect that.
I needed something stable and reliable and that what I got with this system, and I like the real-time kernel that thing gives good performance for what I do. Debian/Ubuntu have flexible toolchains, so compiling software is a breeze and most git pages have Debian/Ubuntu instructions.
Plus lxqt + openbox are peak UI for me, doesn't get any better.
My mom was using linux but the Pajeets would not let her take the Food Safety exam for her business because their software only runs on Mac and Windows.