@magicalthinking It's unacceptable that the ONLY TVs available these days are these stupid "smart" TVs. I hate everyone involved in this supply chain, including Costco, Walmart, Target, and every other idiot retailer. I hate the manufacturers who thought this was a good idea. And I hate the brain dead CONSOOMERS who vote with their wallet for convenience over freedom.
@alex@magicalthinking And who owns those companies, Alex? Most of the people at the top of their corporate ladders are jews or avowed zionists. They view us as cattle. Look into what Hitler did to the bankers and the international corporations when he took power. He stripped them of their resources and forced them to leave his country. Can anyone tell me they don't want to do the same at this point? The people responsible for these abusive corporations should either be tried for treason or exiled to some isolated hellhole.
@alex@magicalthinking Average American was buying dumb TVs as long as they were on the shelves. Here they didn't stick around on clearance, as soon as they were out of production they were GONE.
@alex@magicalthinking Again, most corporate CEOs are jews or zionists. I didn't say "all." And you can bet most billionaires, zionists or not, are compromised. Ethnic jews control the banking system that they rely upon. Even billionaires, like Kanye West, can't speak out against them without severe punishments.
You can bet that, even if Anthony Wood himself isn't a zionist, he doesn't want to piss off the 6 companies that make most of the content he displays through his indoctrination boxes.
1. Ethnic jews control most of the media in our countries. 2. Ethnic jews control most of the financial system in our countries. 3. Billionaires who speak out against them have been publicly destroyed by a coordinated effort.
You haven't even disputed these facts, nor can you, as they're indisputably true.
@magicalthinking@FRENZMagazine I had never heard of this feature, but I don't see how it matters in their proprietary surveillance system anyway. There is no acceptable level of freedom under those terms.
@magicalthinking@alex I don't think there's much magical thinking required here. Forget about the political aspect, the people responsible, etc. What problems did private channels introduce for their operations? Here are some that come to mind:
Private channels could have presented content that they couldn't properly monitor, censor, or profit from. Perhaps some unsavory content got through, or content that they otherwise wanted to stop from spreading for ideological reasons. I'm 100% sure that some of the private channels allowed for piracy, as I witnessed people with such channels on their Roku TVs. Perhaps they didn't feel they were making enough money from the private channels.
I think these are reasonable presumptions, even if they aren't guaranteed to be the full picture. Forcing people to use their corporate channels is almost certainly more profitable than allowing for the use of private channels.
@magicalthinking@alex Killing private channels was likely a move to help consolidate viewership onto their corporate channels. Do you disagree with that much?
@houseofosborne@FRENZMagazine@magicalthinking It's funny, when people argue against me they accuse me of being a Jew. Then when they argue for me I'm a fellow white man. So which is it? I am Persian mostly. Watching woke Nazis argue over whether or not I'm white is a fun introduction to far-right purity spiraling, exactly like leftists do.
Dude. Step one, people hate the infographics, it makes you look like an insane person. HT can get away with it because he's intentionally ridiculous. Second, if you hadn't noticed, pretty sure Alex is an ethnic jew. So, getting him to hate his own people is not going to work for you.
@houseofosborne@alex@magicalthinking I'm not looking to harass the guy with infographics 😂 He seems to have similar sentiments towards large corporations to many of our guys, albeit for different reasons, so I couldn't help but chime in. I appreciate the civil discussion, even if he doesn't agree.
@alex@houseofosborne@magicalthinking I didn't think about your race before engaging in discussion, if it matters. Our movement is for the betterment of our own folk (i.e. European people), which is why we gatekeep based on race, but I would be happy to see every other group start their own form of National Socialism, on their own land, to help their own people. Wanting the best for my people doesn't mean wanting harm on members of out groups--Hitler himself was very specific about that. In a sense, I'm advocating for the policies that I feel would be most beneficial to every group.
@FRENZMagazine@alex@houseofosborne@magicalthinking >Wanting the best for my people doesn't mean wanting harm on members of out groups This is the thing I respect the most about Nazis, because I don't ever hear a similar thing from most groups. Libtards will say they want 'equity' and ignore the pain and damage their policies cause. National Socialists will say they want the best for their people and yours to have the same.
@houseofosborne@BowsacNoodle@alex@magicalthinking Maybe for some people. Some of us have put a lot of time into reading and understanding Hitler's ideas, and the ideas of other National Socialists who have come after him. George Lincoln Rockwell and Oswald Mosley brought their own forms of NatSoc to the US and the UK respectively, so we have our own localized ideological leaders to draw from who already put the work in to adapt the ideas to fit our needs.
I personally try to live my life as closely to those ideas as I can, as does most of my family. It's not something we restrict to the internet. National Socialism influences our decisions about everything--dietary choices, creative projects, substance use (or lack thereof), content consumption, and much more, is all considered in relation to our ideology.
This modern "Nazi" identity is just another internet larp for people who lack a real identity. It doesn't even represent anything actual "Nazis" believed, like German Nationalism, the cornerstone of their beliefs.
@houseofosborne@alex@magicalthinking@FRENZMagazine It probably is for some. I'm sure there's more than a few "Wignat Guys with Latina Wives" hanging out flying their windmill of friendship, or regular dudes who play it up for an internet fun.
What does it take to recreate these components in a shop with access to a basic 3D printer and maybe a lathe? What components could be sourced and hacked/repurposed from other devices? Where can toner be sourced or made?
You tell me. It boggles my mind few people have gone down this path to document or create a 2D printer from scratch in their own time because we've always been able to depend on such a basic device to always be available.
It would be unfortunate for these companies if someone released a totally open source laser jet printer platform. One where every component could be modified and be interchangeable with an entire slew of cartridge options not beholden to a single manufacturer.
@pyrate Sure a totally free hardware design printer would be a nice to have, but that'll be very hard to pull off and actually manufacture, as the result would infringe a bunch of patents for one (the government does it again).
The closest line of printers to freedom seem to be Kyocera ones - as those run GNU/BusyBox/Linux on an ARM SoC, which is attached to printing hardware.
I see that there is some GPLv2 enforcement taking place as to the source code of the software on those printers, but I'm not sure how that'll go - ideally the printing drivers have been implemented as Linux modules, or otherwise are derivative works of GPL'd software, so printing doesn't need to be reverse engineered.