@msbellows@inthehands@blogdiva I think the resistance is to the idea that unique attributes can be imputed to being part of a single cohort rather than a certain age.
Like this: "'Millennials don't really want to work. They're far too focused on avocado toast and chai lattes!' Just one of the many clichés expressed by workers over the age of 50."
@inthehands@dyckron@blogdiva What is "generation" if not "age and historical time period," though? E g., aren't "boomers" and "teens and twenties during the 1960s" basically the same thing?
"The second reason why we (want to) believe in generations seems to be 'generationalism'—a new '-ism' that offers an overly simplified way of explaining the world ... it allows us to see our social group as better than another, which makes us feel good about ourselves. But thinking in '-isms' is dangerous and ... [i]f we're not careful, we end up using unsupported generalizations that have no foundation in reality"
@dyckron@inthehands@blogdiva This risks veering off-topic, but I hypothesize that humans' tendency to firm in-groups and out-groups is rooted in evolutionary biology. I'm curious whether the "-isms" and generational distinctions we're discussing actually are as inbuilt as conservatives' nationalism and racism, and if so, what the wise political strategy is.