@georgia tfw that makes me wonder if I am one or not, usually I would say I'm atheist because no dieties/gods, but I do think there are souls/spirits (plus a whole bunch of other things from modern celtic folklore). An example of that being why I make the difference between a cyborg and a robot.
@georgia@retropikzel_ Yup, because souls aren't technology, you could say they're an unknown in current science, like as far as I know, we haven't managed to create one artificially, not even a bootleg like Frankenstein monster. In fact one way I'd explain that is how "cloning" is more like creating artificial twins, so two very distinct beings, even if they had the exact same experience/memories.
@retropikzel_@georgia Yeah, you could. But "advanced technology" ⇒ "seen as magic by less advanced people" doesn't really goes the other way, unless you're saying there's more advanced people with said technology? :D (I don't btw, but I entirely can accept the idea, at least as long as it didn't get disproven)
@lanodan@georgia@retropikzel_ > Yup, because souls aren't technology, you could say they're an unknown in current science, like as far as I know, we haven't managed to create or even duplicate one artificially, not even a bootleg like Frankenstein monster. That's mostly because we haven't managed to measure one.
The first step in being able to do anything mechanistically is to be able to measure it.
@lispi314@retropikzel_@georgia I'd more say proper observation, like we probably got able to create fires artificially with the proper materials and techniques but no measurements beyond our eyes.