@gabriel@xianc78 i seem to recall the whole "enough energy to boil the oceans in the space of a cup" thing came from mainline physicists. the only real debatable element is whether these people did in fact figure out a vacuum tap--or more likely were bullshitters. most of them are bullshitters.
there are a couple suggestions that you have to do some really odd shit. very high frequency oscillations or such. i saw someone used one of the formulas used to build circuit sims and it did confirm an over-unity prediction but you had to have very smol things vibrating very quickly for the math to futz.
some less weird things i've seen are suggestions that if you could evacuate electrons from a stator fast enough it would eliminate lenz loss, or something like having each stator with an independent circuit that can be cut off to avoid back-emf screwing with stuff. in those designs they tried to disconnect the circuits so the back-emf would fill in to caps, which is not free energy but it does make the engines significantly efficient (in theory.)
i may have read about some of that stuff back in the day :neocat_woozy:
but yes vacuum tapping is forbidden, as is electrogavitics, you get in to some !fun! issues with those.
@xianc78@gameliberty.club I wholeheartedly believe these guys knew something worth keeping suppressed but I'm very skeptical about Free Energy and especially infinite... That said, you may want to check out this video about vacuum energy.
When it comes to the suppressed energy technology discussion there really are two major factors 1) Completely novel physics While I have little faith in academia, I wholeheartedly believe the MIC would take advantage of any and every new technique. I think it's not likely that there are technologies that are "game changers" without retooling many other things as well (thus introducing opportunity costs)
2) Scaling issues Most of the discussions I've seen about energy harvesting are by people who underestimate the amount of energy they actually need and just get excited about simple zero-cost energy that can't be scaled to more practical applications
I do believe that political decisions have influenced the direction and history of the energy sector for a long time, but my approach to these kinds of claims is I want to see it fully open source and replicated.
Recently, I've been going down the "Free/Infinite energy suppression" rabbit hole. It seems like generating an infinite amount of energy for free is pretty easy, yet this knowledge is being suppressed by governments and corporations. Two of the most well known proponents of free/infinite energy, Stanley Meyer and Eugene Mallove were both apparently murdered, with Stanley being poisoned and Eugene being beaten to death in a supposed house robbery.
@xianc78 coercivity is when magnets depolarize over time when exposed to other magnetic fields.
This machine's principle operation is motion from opposed permanent magnets, which would be subject to depolarization (degradation) and thus could not be reasonably called "perpetual."
I would wonder if the energy such a device would release over time would be greater than the energy impounded in the manufacture of the magnets?
@jeremiah I don't know what that is. This is a perpetual motion machine (something that mainstream science says is impossible) being used as an electric generator. Supposedly, governments and corporations are trying to suppress this knowledge because it is a legitimate threat to the fossil fuel industry unlike the controlled opposition, climate scam.
Magnetic energy seems to be the easiest. I actually had a similar idea, but I figured that there must be some reason why it can't be done, but it looks like I was wrong.
This generator in particular uses the potential energy from repealing magnets to generate free and unlimited electricity.
Now here is a free energy generator that is more similar to the one that I had in mind. It uses a wheel of magnets along with stationary magnets at just the right angle that it causes the wheel to spin indefinitely, thus generating unlimited electricity for free.
This is something so simple that an elementary schooler should be able to understand, yet the elites want to keep this hidden from us.
@jeremiah@xianc78 it might be kind of hard to isolate them as well if they were at a plant. I'd think that this is a cool little way to generate some power but it wouldn't be stable or efficient enough to work for a whole grid. Maybe you could make your own as a little backup or supplementary power source.
@jeremiah@SAUNDERS@xianc78 Assuming it was possible to mitigate coercivity through generated electricity, this would be a really interesting way to make a small scale heater that could be started with a good spin and runs good a while under its own EM force.