The only way to "fix it" is to tear it down...but...you can't because so many people will die...
I think state run health care in the US is the only option which mitigates losses, but for the love of god, just read your cities budget sometime if you live in a liberal city. Over 50% of THE ENTIRE TAX BASE goes to health care companies.
One simple fix: Make all drugs otc, but regulate resale license to stop hoarding, and make labs available without orders. This will force doctors to compete for clients for most common, life long diseases, e.g. diabetes, high blood pressure, etc.
This would dramatically drop the cost of care for most people, make many emergency room and doctors visits unnecessary, and otherwise free up medical resources.
I find it strange that a particular order has such a monopoly on such an existential component of being. Imagine if we required a lawyer to approve contracts before you were allowed to enter into them, and you had to buy law insurance. We'd find that abhorrent. Why we don't feel the same way about medicine is evidence of a longterm grooming on par with the propoganda that has caused people to believe in the holocaust.
"People will harm themselves" is always the mantra. The same argument could be made for legal decisions. I could tell you stories. But no one says it in that context. I don't see how medical decisions are any different. Imagine farming out your right to self-determination to some fuck twat controlled by national associations and state administrations under the mantra of "other people will themselves." SMFH.
The problem with making all drugs OTC is that people can make really bad healthcare decisions, see all the covidiots. They’d eat all those OTC drugs even if they don’t need it, and take the wrong amount when they do. Remember how niggers are incapable of consistently taking antibiotics for a week. In addition certain drugs can’t be taken together with certain other drugs. You need some system to rein in the stupidest people and decisions because the consequences are literally deadly.
Most prescription medications aren't drugs that people abuse. Plus, just like I would advise anyone with a legal problem to consult a lawyer, I also believe that people should consult doctors when needed, but a lot of people have diseases for life and are familiar with their own care. Short of having to get a prescription or labs, the need for a doctor for that class of people is de minimis. They are typically familiar with their medications and labs, so seeing a doctor is literally an unnecessary cost. I'd even argue that it's an administrative tax since the requirement is one created by state law pursuant to its police powers.
Here's another odd take: Doctors are state actors exercising either legislative or judicial power because they can legalize the possession and use of substances for specific people via their own judgments. Thus, they act like court by determining facts about their patients and enjoining their prosecution for possession and use via prescription or they act as a legislature if the prescription is viewed as a bill authorizing the possession and use.
I've heard much of South America is like this too, but with the pharmacist also playing a role of a quasi-doctor that will make recommendations based on symptoms.
Imagine your daughter has a UTI. It's not her first. She was hoping it would cure itself, but it's Saturday at 3am and she has a fever of 103. Should you have to pay $5000 for the emergency room visit or should the law allow you to get antibiotics at a pharmacy for $20? 🤔