They want to ban you from going further than 15 minutes from your residence. Monetize every step you make, make sure you buy from provided shops, and 24/7 tracking. Basically modern serfdom.
It was a very different way of life and honestly great. I got to speak with my neighbors and felt like part of a community. I would meet new people all the time. The tradeoff was having a tiny apartment, but I believe the concept of a 15-minute city in general is great.
@olmitch@alex having lived my entire life in cities which definitely classify under 15-minute-cities (or even less), i cannot comprehend why anyone would hate this
@lebronjames75@olmitch@alex ask why they need to cover entire areas with cameras and sensors to make their "fifteen minute cities"
1. they need to put cameras and microphones and other sensors all over the city to monitor how people and vehicles are moving around 2. the cameras, microphones and sensors serve dual surveillance purpose 3. after they can monitor everything they will start restricting movement, like "no cars in these areas on these days to reduce pollution" but serves dual purpose that they can shut down anything down at any time.
the term for this is turnkey tyranny. It is not used for nefarious purposes (debatable, in London they instantly used the cameras to spy on everybody) but it trivially can be repurposed for it.
@alex@olmitch i would also like to know, mass surveillance has no relation whatsoever to the concept, so why are those words combined in one sentence like they're related? how is the best concept in city planning that could ever be devised, related to one of the worst concepts in a surveillance state? it makes no sense to call one with the other and sounds like some automotive/oilbaron lobby degeneracy
@lebronjames75@alex it horrifies to see so many of you have positive opinions about 15 minute cities. Horrifies. I'll have to post more memes about it, clearly.
@alex@Marakus I like living downtown too :) the only place I have to go outside my neighborhood is work, which is in another city. I'm thankful I am not fined for simply traveling further than 15 min from my bed
@lebronjames75@alex@olmitch it may be that in the long term these things are unavoidable or we should focus on making our governments not evil so we can have nice things but this is the reason some people are against them right now.
I think that's what was pointed out when this was first pitched: that something like what they were pitching would happen organically were it not for the assaults on communities by the very same clowns. IOW, it is an attempt to create a forced, artificial version of the very thing they destroyed.
@Moon@alex@olmitch 1. just doesnt work without total facial recognition which is an absolute human rights violation which is just authoritarianism which is death penalty worthy evilness in my head. just having that data is a crime against humanity 2. see one 3. doesnt work again and sounds like 1. applies again
mass surveillance is unarguably evil with near no exception, so i truly dont see how one could ever combine those two things (15 min city + mass surveillance) in good faith, since none of the good faith arguments could ever possibly work
if anyone from any side did that, i'd be incredibly upset, i see
@lebronjames75@alex@olmitch you can theoretically do this without facial recognition/individual detection. you can monitor simple head counts going in and out of areas. in practice though they want that data because they want to see the paths that individuals are taking so they can understand foot travel flow at a deeper level.
@olmitch@alex@lebronjames75 the canon reason is that there was mass eugenic genetic engineering in the 1990s that made the human population better. it also led to another world war because they made superhumans that demanded to rule because they were superior.
@Moon@alex@lebronjames75 right. In Star Trek, the technology exists to eliminate privacy but they solved the trust issue somehow. Hopefully we can find an alternative to "The Nuclear Horror" chapter of Star Trek history
@Moon@alex@olmitch know what's a much simpler, and privacy non invading method for that? Telecommunications phone tracking via amounts-of-connections-to-what-mast
its also simpler, quicker, more effective, and completely privacy OK_hand_emoji
@alex@olmitch i love the city where i live in cause its very walkable. Id love them to expand their subway and light rail system tho. Pittsburgh is p nice.
@Moon@alex@lebronjames75@olmitch i have nothing against 15 minute or walkable cities i do have problems with the insane surveilance though. Libs love to ban everuthing and watch us for some reason its fucking weird
@olmitch@alex@lebronjames75 on the wikis and other sources they don't explicitly say that humans are so great because everybody got genetic engineering but you can tease it out from dialog in various episodes. The writers don't want you to realize they effectively said eugenics are good.
@Moon@alex@lebronjames75 no, the superhumans were exiled from earth, and then the nuclear horror happened, killing most of the population of earth. What was left were some mad max type NPCs.
The people in this court room are plucked from that era
@olmitch@alex@lebronjames75 Bashir was born in 2341 and human augmentation was banned in 1996. all humans weren't augments but they used genetic engineering to get rid of disease and criminality.
@Moon@alex@lebronjames75 I completely disagree. Julian Bashir was an augment, and he met other augments who were basically in the custody of starfleet for being illegal and showed classical autism symptoms. His parents got him gene spliced on the black market. Augments are an oppressed minority in Star Trek and definitely are not common.
@lebronjames75@alex@Moon@olmitch Funny bit in that is is how cars come with a lot of built-in transmission devices including phones, which various part of the world either made mandatory for new cars or wanted to. And speed cameras and other license plate recording devices have existed for decades.
Tracking *everyone* walking/cycling is much harder as no everyone keeps their phone on themselves and thanks to smartphones it's shit that gets discharged frequently.
@lebronjames75@alex@olmitch star trek version is muddy because they don't always make a distinction between eliminating disease (which they periodically still do in the future) and augmentation where they made humans that were super strong and super smart and lived twice as long. augmentation was banned because it led to natural class division between augments and people that refused to get augmentation.
abortions for severely genedefected babies, including the option for abortion at birth if the genedefect was not previously detected for whatever reason (harlequin baby for example) assisted suicide for the terminally ill castration of extreme criminals (serial/mass murderers, large scale fraudsters (large scale to me is >= the monetary value of one adult human being, which i estimate at ~~10million USD ish) dont find much trouble in using stuff like DNA-injecting-viral-loads to make babies immune to HIV, though this would obviously have some hilarious future consequences, such as star trek's storyline as youve written
@lanodan@alex@Moon@olmitch dont need to track everyone, 80% of people anonymously tracked will stlil give you roughly the same data as 100% of people tracked.
@ec670@Moon@alex@olmitch there would be no issue if the last sentence was missing. if it was entirely localized and in-car only, i'd say its 100% fine. it doesnt need to use the cloud to function, yet it does. the "collected data being uploaded out of the car into the cloud" function is malicious by default, and cannot not be malicious
@Mondobizarrro@alex@Moon@lebronjames75@olmitch I think it’s because they have generally “abnormal” inclinations and sensibilities, higher than average sensitivities, and massive trust issues re: everyone outside their accepted community (kind of normal, but it’s coupled with agenda driven ambition to make their world view and way of life the default one). Things need to be banned because it threatens the stability of the whole (“big things have s beginnings” and all that) and people need to be monitored because they cannot be trusted to do the Right Thing™ on their own.
The post WWII European puppet regimes and the civil rights movement gave politicians the idea that they could rule by propoganda plus force of law, but the truth is that law must conform to the preexisting activity of the people. When law diverges from the natural inclinations of the people, instability ensues.
It eventually breaks when the gap is large enough — political idealism eventually diverges from nature (notice I said "natural inclinations") and the system breaks down.
As one of my political philosophy professors once said, the beauty of a democratic republic is that a majority can vote that the moon is made of cheese and it is so. (He was being sarcastic obviously).
to a degree. They've almost completely eradicated smoking here, and the use of fireplaces just through laws. Social engineering does work provided it's done slowly enough and people think they can go back if they need to.