Techbros: self driving cars are inevitable!
Also techbros: prove you are human by performing a task that computers can’t do, like identifying traffic lights.
Techbros: self driving cars are inevitable!
Also techbros: prove you are human by performing a task that computers can’t do, like identifying traffic lights.
@robcornelius I’m fully aware. I’m also aware that they are STILL doing both, simultaneously. Only one can be true. Which is it?
(Hint, it’s “computers can’t identify traffic lights”. Self driving cars are, in fact, randomised murderbots)
Why do you think the tech bros want us to identify traffic lights, bicycles etc. Its so they can better train their "AI" models to spot them so the self driving cars become a reality. We are all beta testers
Its down to certain peoples egos (specifically Muskrats) versus reality. Its not going to end well, that's for sure.
Have you ever noticed you are never asked to identify street objects in upscale neighbourhoods? OK posh neighbourhoods are less cluttered but....
@goatsarah The great plan:
1️⃣ Give techbros all your data for free
2️⃣ spend your meaningless life watching boring and annoying ads all time, even while farting at WC, giving techbros bucks in the process.
2️⃣ Help techbros to train visual AI via captchas
3️⃣ be smashed in an driving incident by a self-driving car.
4️⃣ PROFIT!
@goatsarah
I wonder if this means that if you spend hours intentionally providing the wrong answers round and round in circles, that it will serve to confuse AI learning somewhat 🤔
@bornach @robcornelius Except that's nothing like the widely internationally ratified sign for a traffic light, as used in most of the world (completely the wrong shape for a start!)
Perhaps it is because the self-driving AI's already know what objects are unambiguously traffic lights but still require human input to answer the philosophical questions of whether the iconic depiction of a traffic light painted on a sign counts as a traffic light
@adam Ok, 2 problems: 1. American roads. The US has not signed up to the Vienna Convention on traffic signs which most of the rest of the world uses.
2. Those cars are out there today, so if they still need training to recognise things that they aren't supposed to run into, then they're basically murderbots.
@goatsarah@thegoatery.dyndns.org iirc that's the exact reason why captchas include things that can be encountered on roads, to help the AI recognize them.
@antonpodolsky That's what they're doing.
As a result, they will get very good at spotting things that look like American traffic lights used in Captchas, and probably dreadful at spotting anything else.
@goatsarah If I was a techbro I would totally use the data collected from captchas to train AI models.
@goatsarah@thegoatery.dyndns.org I didn't want to imply that I support self-driving cars. I think it's a terrible idea. And in its current form it actually does more harm than good.
@goatsarah You just described my trepidations over this forever now! This is just pure gold
@goatsarah actually Teslas can identify traffic lights.
@goatsarah @robcornelius
But coming back to the more general problem, and taking the point of view of a budding data scientist.
It's not a question if algorithm-driven cars cause accidents. (the AI buzzword gives me migraine)
Humans DO cause accidents too.
So the question is: Do computer-driven cars cause more or less accidents than humans.
It's hard to assess this, at the moment, as there are literally only a tiny number of really self-driving cars.
@yacc143 @goatsarah @robcornelius There are roughly 70 companies researching driving automation here in the Bay Area that provide data to the state. Safety of these vehicles peaked around 3 years ago with the best performing cars having 5 times as many accidents per mile as the average driver. They appear to have reached the asymptote of the improvement curve.
@goatsarah @robcornelius
In the context of the trolley problem, they literally must be.
(As are BTW humans, generally speaking, when an accident happens, humans do not have the time to take a well reasoned decision, it generally is more or less a random decision if at all.)
Taking any stand on the trolley problem, and related ones, immediately raises questions of liability. So random() is the "safe" out for moral cowards.
@yacc143 @MartyFouts @goatsarah
Money
Next Question.
@MartyFouts
That begs the question how come they got the permission to test on public roads and endanger the public of that's their best case?
@goatsarah @robcornelius
@MartyFouts
Don't take it wrongly, but the German car makers literally spent years in R&D and ended up offering way less (co pilot system for limited use cases eg high ways/autobahns), literally citing this as the safe state of the art. They could offer more of they were willing to associate their brands with unsafe cars.
@goatsarah at intersections automated vehicles continue in between crossing traffic without stopping, all vehicles being aware of the others and keeping necessary distance. No lights needed.
@goatsarah Nice joke!! I actually learned recently why captcha or recaptcha got so simple, it's because it's not the result that matters 😂 It's the mouse path 🐁
@goatsarah Whenever I encounter a captcha like that I imagine there’s somewhere just in this very moment a poor little self driving car needing my assistance.
@goatsarah Why do you think "techbros" are a homogenous amorphous mass with a single will? Do you even have a working definition of what a "techbro" is? This sounds like classical prejudice to me - invent a group, then ascribe all opinions by one member to the group as a whole.
@goatsarah Trying to pull seniority on someone you don't know is not really a power move. Nor does it advance the discussion.
@StephanSchulz "Nor does it advance the discussion", he said, nasally.
Nice fedora. Did your mum get it for you?
@goatsarah With enough people solving captchas constantly we'll be able to use them to help cars solve ethical problems on the fly like should I swerve to avoid the small child and hit the old lady
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.